BluDevAv8r
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 985
Dave Benjamin said:Do you think your managment would retain aircraft if they lost flying? Just sit there and pay a higher lease rate to park them in a boneyard? Unless they had another contract to fulfill I suspect they would not pay leases on equipment that isn't being utilized.
I cannot comment on what XJT would (or wouldn't) do in such a theoretical situation.
Dave Benjamin said:SkyWest operational performance and reliability is excellent also. In fact the DOT rated them as the #1 ontime airline.
I'm aware of the DOT numbers. Skywest runs a great operation. On-time performance (especially when some aircraft aren't ACARS-equipped...although I don't believe they factor into the DOT rankings) isn't the only metric one should look at. What is Skywest's all-in completion rate? What is their completion rate when one backs out weather and ATC cancellations? Etc.
Dave Benjamin said:But look at how much flying is going to Mesa, Chataqua, Colgan, and other carriers. For Continental to remain comptetive do you think they can afford much exclusivity with Xjet? As many others have said, it's truly a race to the bottom. UAL clearly doesn't care much about whether or not pax make it to their destination. Just take a look at the amount of cancelled and delayed Mesa flights on the monitors at any airport they serve. Unless oil drops and yields increase it's just a matter of time before Xjet faces new and dirt cheap competition. Mainline Co is already hitting their pilots for concessions.
Yep. Sad but true. Price has overcome quality in many instances. We'll see if CAL succombs to such a path for its jet feeder flying.
Dave Benjamin said:I wish the Xjet the guys the best and hope they can hold on to their recent gains. You guys have a great commuter policy, decent work rules, and pretty decent retirement. I'd not only like to see you keep it all but I'd like to see some other carriers play catchup instead of lowering the bar.
I agree with you here. Sadly, nobody (in the small jet ranks) is up for a few years...except you guys and ASA. ASA has mounds of problems negotiating with their management right now due to DL. Comair is in June 2006 (not too far away) but Air Wisconsin isn't until 2011 and CHQ is in October 2008, 2 months ahead of when ours is amendable. Eagle...well...4 years from now they go into another round of their process.
Dave Benjamin said:The best hope is to get a job outside of 121 pax service and find a segment of the industry where the business plan does not consist of losing money on every ticket and trying to make it up in volume. Maybe freight, charter, or some overseas opportunity. I doubt that companies like Emirates and Cathay make it a point to lose money.
Agreed here too. I think the last few years and next few years will really cause many pilots to rethink their goals and their expectations with their aviation careers. Some will choose to pursue another road in aviation and others will leave the industry altogether...because so many (myself included) had their heart set on flying 8 days a month in a 777 for $350,000 per year.
-Neal