WhiteCloud
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2002
- Posts
- 1,012
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Even if we were union we couldn't do much about this as pilot's don't become union members until they finish class at the earliest.
GuppyPuppy said:[BAnd, back to the original thread...SkyWest management took a 20% paycut, but didn't cut pay or benefits for the pilots. [/B]
skypine69 said:
I am considering quitting over this deal. It means that much to me that my fellow pilots out there are being asked to work their arse off for 6 weeks with no pay while we have 2 houseboats sitting down on lake powell for the corp officers to use.
SkyWestCRJPilot said:The fact that SkyWest management took a 20% pay cut has to be taken with a grain of salt. That's a 20% pay cut from their salary but doesn't include stock options and bonuses which I understand make up the great majority of their overall compensation.
Ziggy1 said:
OK Monkey...the answer is neither. Run the business better and make some money is the only answer. They will take it from you if they can and new hires are the way it always starts.
MetroSheriff said:Ziggy,
If you were talking about AMR or UAL I would agree whole heartedly. When you make the argument with reference to SkyWest, it diesn't hold water.
SkyWest is likely the best run regional airline in the industry. To claim SkyWest is mismanaged is laughable.>
Hey MetroSheriff, You got me out of context a little. I have no idea how well Skywest is run or not run. I was responding to the premise that (to paraphrase) "IF Skywest needs to make cutbacks who should pay the price...Pilots that have been with the company or newhires". Neither group should have to work for free regardless of the need to make cuts. Frankly, if it's Skywest's desire to remain non-union they just shot themselves in the foot. Ziggy1
Ziggy1 said:MetroSheriff said:Ziggy,
If you were talking about AMR or UAL I would agree whole heartedly. When you make the argument with reference to SkyWest, it diesn't hold water.
SkyWest is likely the best run regional airline in the industry. To claim SkyWest is mismanaged is laughable.>
Hey MetroSheriff, You got me out of context a little. I have no idea how well Skywest is run or not run. I was responding to the premise that (to paraphrase) "IF Skywest needs to make cutbacks who should pay the price...Pilots that have been with the company or newhires". Neither group should have to work for free regardless of the need to make cuts. Frankly, if it's Skywest's desire to remain non-union they just shot themselves in the foot. Ziggy1
My apologies for the misunderstanding.
Your previous post did not sound like it was written by someone who loves their company. That is why I called you on it.skypine69 said:EMB...
You are wrong about me. I love this company and my job. I have been here for over 10 years.
Our officers said that no employee making under 30K would take a pay cut. A new hire pilot makes under 30K. Why the double standard?
skypine69 said:RJ Captain.
Yes, one can love a company and still complain about it... Sitting back and saying nothing when something is done wrong is worse than complaining!