Doc Holiday
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2005
- Posts
- 114
ManChild said:How are the feds going to know if you have had SIC training? The proof doesn't need to be with you. I would also have to say that the PIC would take the heat anyway for not having a qualified SIC. They are responsible for the flight. If your not qualified, your just a passenger. Three TO and Landings are pretty easy. Getting them RVSM trained is harder.
Who cares how the feds are going to find out??? The rules are there for a reason. 61.55 spells out what needs to be accomplished, which makes for a much safer crew than your "three TO and Landings". Having somebody bounce an airplane off the runway three times and then pencil-whipping the rest causes accidents. Accidents injure/kill people, destroy airplanes, and increase insurance rates. Insurance companies know this, and that is why many of them require operators to go above and beyond 61.55 and attend formal sim training.
And you might want to read 61.55 again. I don't think your "If your not qualified, your (you're as in 'you are' BTW) just a passenger" defense is very logical. The first sentence of the reg says "...no person may serve...", not "no operator may use".
I hope you are never running the show at any of these operations. People with your mentality hurt us all.