Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Should This Pilot Be Fired?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Intentional stalls in your company aircraft is foolish, not scary, unless authorized and/or required for mx or operational purposes.

Like, say, a .297 check ride?
 
2 things you never want to hear in the cockpit.

Captain saying " Watch this"


F/O saying "I have an idea"!
 
Like, say, a .297 check ride?

I've taken lots of .297 rides, and never been asked to do a stall.
 
Like, say, a .297 check ride?

I've taken lots of .297 rides, and never been asked to do a stall.

I think you must mean a .299 Line Check.

A .297 Check requires at least 1 (turning) stall. 2 stalls may be waived. So, if someone is signing off your .297's without having you demonstrate at least 1 stall, then your check rides have been invalid.
 
I think you must mean a .299 Line Check.

A .297 Check requires at least 1 (turning) stall. 2 stalls may be waived. So, if someone is signing off your .297's without having you demonstrate at least 1 stall, then your check rides have been invalid.

If we want to be perfectly correct, you only have to demonstrate recovery from an approach to a stall by recovering from the first indication.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top