Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Screwing 135

  • Thread starter Thread starter AZ Typed
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 13

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
sweeper said:
The problem arises if a scheduled operator goes on strike and another airline comes in and flies the routes for that airline. Routes that are yours before the strike are ok to fly, but putting extra flights on the same routes shared with the on strike airline are not.

The only reason I responded to the post is that SCAB is a strong word in this industry and being labeled one incorrectly can hurt in the future.

Which is EXACTLY what you are doing with your example. Labeling incorrectly.

Based on your example, you seem to believe that if American goes on strike (they have flights from ORD to BFE) and UAL decides to increase THEIR schedule from 4 flights a day to 6 on that same ORD-BFE route, that now the UAL pilots are scabs?!?

Think again.

When EAL was on strike, plenty of US carriers increased flights on their routes. For example, Delta in the SE US and to Latin America. So, were the DAL pilots "scabbing"? Hardly.

If your are going to lecture people about throwing the "scab" word around, then get your facts straight.
 
Mach92 said:
If they fly during a strike you figure it out. You think both pilot groups hate each other now just wait.

this is a sticky point that gives me indigestion- they (nji) don't want anything to do with you guys- leave them the f alone. they are happy doing their thing. i support your cause in so far as you should be better compensated. just not at their expense. they are not part of your union so of course they would fly. i am sure i will be flying some trips that would normally be flown by QS airplane, it doesn't make me a scab. i have a job to do and my loyalty is to myself and my family. i am not in your union. if i was i wouldn't fly but if they tell me to fly - i fly. i still support your cause. :)
 
ok Yank...you got me....

But, how about in the case of a feeder airline that shares a route with a mainline carrier that is on strike adding flights in place of the mainline flights?
 
Last edited:
Semperfido....what you don't understand is that NJI, NJE and EJM are very much involved in what NJA does. The President of NJA already admitted during the last round of negotiations that NJA has subsidized those operations. They have been feeding off of us for a while now. Its funny, when you look at the cover page for the release for any NJI flight....it originates out of CMH......Its right there in black and white!!!!

 
EXACTLY!!!

When Boisture stands up at the company recurrent meetings and tells NJA pilots he can't afford to give us a raise, shows the charts that depict how much NJE and NJI are losing, then that is exactly the reason to bring them all in house. Especially if there is legal precedent to do so. If the only reason they are kept separate is so Santulli can move the profits to those parts of the company, at the expense of NJA pilot salaries, then to hell with that!

They fly our customers, they take our profit, and they are paid more, and have the priviledge to fly from home. Time for that crap to stop!
 
Majik said:
EXACTLY!!!

When Boisture stands up at the company recurrent meetings and tells NJA pilots he can't afford to give us a raise, shows the charts that depict how much NJE and NJI are losing, then that is exactly the reason to bring them all in house. Especially if there is legal precedent to do so. If the only reason they are kept separate is so Santulli can move the profits to those parts of the company, at the expense of NJA pilot salaries, then to hell with that!

They fly our customers, they take our profit, and they are paid more, and have the priviledge to fly from home. Time for that crap to stop!

There should be no expectation that Netjets will stop this shell game until the people laying down their money to play become irate. This time is at hand, will it take a shutdown to complete the picture or will we be able educate our owners before they are walking?
 
......
 
Last edited:
What happened to the filing?

x402 said:
There should be no expectation that Netjets will stop this shell game until the people laying down their money to play become irate. This time is at hand, will it take a shutdown to complete the picture or will we be able educate our owners before they are walking?

What happened to the legal case that was going to filed a couple of months ago in court? Didn't someone here say that the Union had hired some special lawyer to make a case?
 
Last edited:
dukeofdub said:
What happened to the legal case that was going to filed a couple of months ago in court? Didn't someone here say that the Union had hired some special lawyer to make a case?

In due time, our time. (Not yours)


all lawyers are special
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom