ScopeCMRandASA=CSmith

[InclusiveScope]

At 1935, ScopeCMRandASA is logged on and CSmith is logged on to ALPA. Your scam is over Chad. Grow a pair and stand by your convictions - Don't pretend to be someone else. I don't agree with you, but I respect your conviction. I do not respect your attempt to represent an ASA or CMR pilot.

You must really be concerned about RJDC since you have tried to expell us from ALPA and now you are trying to portray yourself as an ASA or CMR pilot who is against RJDC.

Thanks for playing Chad, please try again.

Inclusivescope
-the truth buster

 

[Ted Striker]

WTF?

 

[Caveman]

Evene if ScopeCMRand ASA is who you suggest he is it is inappropriate for you to break his anonymity on this board. I could not disagree more with just about anything he/she has to say but he /she has a right to remain anonymous unless he/she is being slanderous. FWIW CSmith is one main reason I haven't frequented the ALPA board for over a year. I was sick of him and Armando spouting the same old crap.

 

[asarjfo]

I'll second that!

 

[FDJ2]

At 1935, ScopeCMRandASA is logged on and CSmith is logged on to ALPA. [/QUOTE

So what? It seems to me that two individual can be on line at the same time on different web sites. Do you feel threatened by CSmith? Do you feel some over riding desire to "out" ScopeCMRand ASA on this website? What's your name and alpa number? If you feel it necessary to "out" others perhaps you should start with yourself. You ought to not focus so much on who is posting and more on the substance of what they're posting.

 

[46Driver]

Evene if ScopeCMRand ASA is who you suggest he is it is inappropriate for you to break his anonymity on this board. I could not disagree more with just about anything he/she has to say but he /she has a right to remain anonymous unless he/she is being slanderous. FWIW CSmith is one main reason I haven't frequented the ALPA board for over a year. I was sick of him and Armando spouting the same old crap.

I'm gonna disagree with you on this one. If he was posting as a Delta pilot, removed himself, and came back to post as a "concerned regional pilot" then that is deceitful at best. He deserves to be exposed.

 

[rjcap]

I'm gonna disagree with you on this one. If he was posting as a Delta pilot, removed himself, and came back to post as a "concerned regional pilot" then that is deceitful at best. He deserves to be exposed.

Ditto.

 

[Caveman]

I agree that he/she needs to be called on the fact that they are posting under two different screen names but I'll stand by my assertion that a posters real name shouldn't be exposed unless they choose to do it themselves.

 

[InclusiveScope]

Caveman,
I don't care if someone posts under two different screen names. I don't care if someone wants to be anonymous. The problem with ScopeCMRandASA is that he is a Delta pilot who is posing as an ASA or CMR "concerned regional pilot". That is why I exposed him - he crossed the line. I stand by that decision. Argue your point - but don't pose as someone else. When CS posed as one of us - he opened the door for exposure.

 

[Freddie Spencer]

ahhhh, you gotta love regional pilots....

 

[InclusiveScope]

Re: Re: ScopeCMRandASA=CSmith

At 1935, ScopeCMRandASA is logged on and CSmith is logged on to ALPA. [/QUOTE

So what? It seems to me that two individual can be on line at the same time on different web sites. Do you feel threatened by CSmith? Do you feel some over riding desire to "out" ScopeCMRand ASA on this website? What's your name and alpa number? If you feel it necessary to "out" others perhaps you should start with yourself. You ought to not focus so much on who is posting and more on the substance of what they're posting.

FDJ2,
"WHO" is posting is very important WHEN they are a DELTA pilot posing as an ASA or CMR "CONCERNED REGIONAL PILOT". That is deceitful and underhanded. That is a punch below the belt and I punch back. You on the other hand are a Delta pilot and you don't try to pass yourself as someone else. If you pose as someone else, your argument has lost all credibility with me and others.

 

[46Driver]

I agree that he/she needs to be called on the fact that they are posting under two different screen names but I'll stand by my assertion that a posters real name shouldn't be exposed unless they choose to do it themselves.

Fair enough. As long as the point was made that the previous screen name and the new screen name are one and the same person, I really don't care what the guy's name is.

 

[bvt1151]

How many times has scopecmrandasa been called out on this? Quite a few. Do a search...there's plenty of evidence.

I, like inclusive scope, will not tolerate an impostor trying to undercut the solidarity of my pilot group. The mole has been flushed out...again.

 

[FDJ2]

Re: Re: Re: ScopeCMRandASA=CSmith

That is deceitful and underhanded. That is a punch below the belt and I punch back.

That's fair enough if you are sure you are correct. I'm just not so sure how you came to the conclusion that CS is SCOPE just because they are simultaneously logged on to different sights. IOW, what if Dan Ford were simultaneously logged on to the ALPA boards while I'm logged on to flightinfo, does that make me Dan Ford? Maybe there is more to your research than that, I don't know, but it just seems coincidental and that's all to me. Perhaps SCOPE is an imposter, but are you sure it's CS?

 

[super ed]

Anyone else notice that the "fins" guy always posts here about the same time as ashcroft and or breiling post on the alpa board?

Super

 

[vc10]

Anyone else notice that the "fins" guy always posts here about the same time as ashcroft and or breiling post on the alpa board?

The Attorney General belongs to ALPA?

 

[Tim47SIP]

Supered

You are actually on the wrong track with fins. Try inclusivescope. Might be a better match. P.S. it is not Ashcroft.

 

[General Lee]

When this guy stated he was a "concerned REGIONAL pilot"---that doesn't mean he flies for a "Regional Airline." He never stated that. He might fly the "Delta Shuttle" out of LGA flying to DCA and BOS---and that flying is absolutely in one region---the NE. I know Chad from Delta Express days, and he was opinionated but I doubt he is this guy. Nice witch hunt. Try not to reveal names on this board, or people may not want to contribute valuable information that some one may want and need. If this guy/girl wanted you to know his/her real name, it would have been posted originally.

Bye Bye--General Lee

 

[bvt1151]

Now come on, General.

He didn't just say he was a "concerned regional pilot." He said quite a few times he flew for Comair. Do a search.
I could care less what his name is, but I care very much that he is not a member of the group he claims to be. Especially when he uses that lie in an attempt to show insolidarity within the Comair group with the intentions of proving his case.

This isn't a case of somebody logging on the same time as somebody else. ScopeCMRandASA has been called out on this several times. Each time, he goes away until it cools down, then back he comes.
His opinions are just that, his opinions, but they are not the opinions of a Comair pilot.

Let it be known;
ScopeCMRandASA does not work for Comair.

Now that we all understand that, let the discussion continue

 

[General Lee]

bvt1151,

Please do a search for me showing him/her saying that he/she flew for Comair. I don't remember that. And, my explanation is absolutely plausible---thank you very much. Regardless, no one should be putting any possible names on here unless they are originally named that way. That is called a Witch Hunt.

Bye Bye--General Lee

 

[79%N1]

Nice try, General.....Please crawl back into your Delta cave and STAY THE HELL OUT OF THE REGIONAL BOARD!!!

 

[bvt1151]

bvt1151,

Please do a search for me showing him/her saying that he/she flew for Comair. I don't remember that. And, my explanation is absolutely plausible---thank you very much. Regardless, no one should be putting any possible names on here unless they are originally named that way. That is called a Witch Hunt.

Bye Bye--General Lee

Here are a few, although its obvious you've already formed a stubborn opinion regardless of the proof:

Posted by ScopeCMRandASA on 02-02-2004, Negotiations & The Cost of "Heck No!"
Comair may or may not be making money. I personally doubt that we are.

Posted by ScopeCMRandASA on 09-29-2003, Negotiations & The Cost of "Heck No!" You think the Delta pilots were going to go after the RJs? Why would they do that? How many of their furloughees have gone to ASA? 10 maybe?

Or maybe they were going to go after the 70 seaters. Remote possibility at best, IMO. IMO again that was just a urban myth perpetuated by the Comair and ASA MECs. Hmm, that sounded like Surplus talking there for a second. The fact is that Delta is not an entry level job. Comair and ASA are. Look at the pay scales. Look at what we fly for, yes that includes me, and we expect to get respect? A laughable statement at best. Let's just say that they had gotten the 70 seaters, which of course they would not becuase Delta had much cheaper pilots to fly them for them legally. Would our pilots have been furloughed? No is the answer. 50 seaters are still coming and will come. Our growth would have slowed ever so slightly, but nonetheless would have been there.

Let me ask you, what claim have we laid to any flying ourselves? Let me guess, we can't because we don't bargain with our "true" employer. Wrong. What fragmentation protection did we have when we were purchased requiring us to be merged with Delta? answer:NONE. Do we have any flying in our contract now which could be "farmed" out in any way, shape, or form? Answer: YES. Truth, we do not have the answers. We are no smarter than the Delta MEC, and it boils down to who has the much, much, much, much, much better contract. All I'm saying is that we lose this RJDC thing, better yet, put it on the back burner. We have not exhausted all possibilities, we have only exhausted those which were solely on our terms, and left the Delta pilots no choice but to say pound sand. It doesn't need to be this hard, and we will lose in the end otherwise.

--a concerned regional pilot

Posted by ScopeCMRandASA on 10-31-2003, Significant Comair NewsWe at the connection carriers are not.

Posted by ScopeCMRandASA on 02-02-2004, Negotiations & The Cost of "Heck No!"I will stand tall and proud as a Comair pilot.

There's plenty more where that came from. I got sick of searching after 4.

 

[FlyComAirJets]

Game - set - match

 

[General Lee]

BVT1151,

Yippee---thanks for doing all that work for me. I appreciate it. You still haven't proved that CSMITH actually is the author---and I doubt you will find out. Maybe it is---maybe it isn't.


79%n1,

Hey buddy, I actually contributed money to this board, which entitles me to do ANYTHING I WANT. If you don't like it---click your computer off. I win.



Flycomairjets,

Do you really think he wins? Think again, hard this time....

Bye Bye--General Lee

 

[bvt1151]

General,

I couldn't care less who scopeCMRandASA really is. What I do care about is who he isn't. Don't confuse what other posters have written with what I have. I think we've clearly established he isn't a Comair pilot. That's my only concern.

 

[FlyComAirJets]

Gee Lee,

I am so glad that you are a Delta pilot, you have proved it to me.

Some people just don't know when they have been thumped like a melon.

Tee hee, you so very funny-- buh bye!

 

[~~~^~~~]

I'm gonna disagree with you on this one. If he was posting as a Delta pilot, removed himself, and came back to post as a "concerned regional pilot" then that is deceitful at best. He deserves to be exposed.

At least exposed as not being the"Concerned Regional Pilot" he pretends to be.

I've been very candid about my support for the RJDC. (meaning I send money) After making posts on the ALPA board, certain folks actually threatened to have the IRS look into my personal finances because they were under the impression that I was getting rich from RJDC donations. That is the sort of crap from certain Delta wackos that chased me off the ALPA boards and why I no longer participate there.

While the General and I may disagree (and hopefully have fun doing so) he has always been above board and I appreciate his participation. On the other hand, you have the folks who have no regard for the truth, like our "Concerned Regional Pilot," who add nothing to our debates.

CSmith, or whoever, should enjoy their $300,000 a year pay check while it lasts and start career planning for what he, or she, will do after Delta declares bankruptcy. There is no living to be made providing color commentary on the FlightInfo boards, thats fer sure, or the IRS really would be looking into me.

~~~^~~~

 

[MetroSheriff]

I, like inclusive scope, will not tolerate an impostor trying to undercut the solidarity of my pilot group. The mole has been flushed out...again.

ROFLMAO! Are you joking? Don't take yourself so seriously.

Imposter...Mole....what is this the CIA???

 

[FlyComAirJets]

You can put as much or little in your profile as you wish. Scope put XXXs in all the fields which is his choice, no problem there. After all, just about all of us use screen names which grants us a degree of annonymity.

But to state that he is currenty a "concerned regional pilot" when, in fact, he is not, is pretty gutless. I am rather relieved he is not a regional pilot. And I hope he isn't a Delta pilot either since it reflects so poorly on that otherwise fine group.

 

[General Lee]

Come on man, everyone has opinions and this is an anonymous board-----realx a bit.

Bye Bye--General Lee