ScopeCMRandASA=CSmith

[79%N1]

Nice try, General.....Please crawl back into your Delta cave and STAY THE HELL OUT OF THE REGIONAL BOARD!!!

 

[bvt1151]

bvt1151,

Please do a search for me showing him/her saying that he/she flew for Comair. I don't remember that. And, my explanation is absolutely plausible---thank you very much. Regardless, no one should be putting any possible names on here unless they are originally named that way. That is called a Witch Hunt.

Bye Bye--General Lee

Here are a few, although its obvious you've already formed a stubborn opinion regardless of the proof:

Posted by ScopeCMRandASA on 02-02-2004, Negotiations & The Cost of "Heck No!"
Comair may or may not be making money. I personally doubt that we are.

Posted by ScopeCMRandASA on 09-29-2003, Negotiations & The Cost of "Heck No!" You think the Delta pilots were going to go after the RJs? Why would they do that? How many of their furloughees have gone to ASA? 10 maybe?

Or maybe they were going to go after the 70 seaters. Remote possibility at best, IMO. IMO again that was just a urban myth perpetuated by the Comair and ASA MECs. Hmm, that sounded like Surplus talking there for a second. The fact is that Delta is not an entry level job. Comair and ASA are. Look at the pay scales. Look at what we fly for, yes that includes me, and we expect to get respect? A laughable statement at best. Let's just say that they had gotten the 70 seaters, which of course they would not becuase Delta had much cheaper pilots to fly them for them legally. Would our pilots have been furloughed? No is the answer. 50 seaters are still coming and will come. Our growth would have slowed ever so slightly, but nonetheless would have been there.

Let me ask you, what claim have we laid to any flying ourselves? Let me guess, we can't because we don't bargain with our "true" employer. Wrong. What fragmentation protection did we have when we were purchased requiring us to be merged with Delta? answer:NONE. Do we have any flying in our contract now which could be "farmed" out in any way, shape, or form? Answer: YES. Truth, we do not have the answers. We are no smarter than the Delta MEC, and it boils down to who has the much, much, much, much, much better contract. All I'm saying is that we lose this RJDC thing, better yet, put it on the back burner. We have not exhausted all possibilities, we have only exhausted those which were solely on our terms, and left the Delta pilots no choice but to say pound sand. It doesn't need to be this hard, and we will lose in the end otherwise.

--a concerned regional pilot

Posted by ScopeCMRandASA on 10-31-2003, Significant Comair NewsWe at the connection carriers are not.

Posted by ScopeCMRandASA on 02-02-2004, Negotiations & The Cost of "Heck No!"I will stand tall and proud as a Comair pilot.

There's plenty more where that came from. I got sick of searching after 4.

 

[FlyComAirJets]

Game - set - match

 

[General Lee]

BVT1151,

Yippee---thanks for doing all that work for me. I appreciate it. You still haven't proved that CSMITH actually is the author---and I doubt you will find out. Maybe it is---maybe it isn't.


79%n1,

Hey buddy, I actually contributed money to this board, which entitles me to do ANYTHING I WANT. If you don't like it---click your computer off. I win.



Flycomairjets,

Do you really think he wins? Think again, hard this time....

Bye Bye--General Lee

 

[bvt1151]

General,

I couldn't care less who scopeCMRandASA really is. What I do care about is who he isn't. Don't confuse what other posters have written with what I have. I think we've clearly established he isn't a Comair pilot. That's my only concern.

 

[FlyComAirJets]

Gee Lee,

I am so glad that you are a Delta pilot, you have proved it to me.

Some people just don't know when they have been thumped like a melon.

Tee hee, you so very funny-- buh bye!

 

[~~~^~~~]

I'm gonna disagree with you on this one. If he was posting as a Delta pilot, removed himself, and came back to post as a "concerned regional pilot" then that is deceitful at best. He deserves to be exposed.

At least exposed as not being the"Concerned Regional Pilot" he pretends to be.

I've been very candid about my support for the RJDC. (meaning I send money) After making posts on the ALPA board, certain folks actually threatened to have the IRS look into my personal finances because they were under the impression that I was getting rich from RJDC donations. That is the sort of crap from certain Delta wackos that chased me off the ALPA boards and why I no longer participate there.

While the General and I may disagree (and hopefully have fun doing so) he has always been above board and I appreciate his participation. On the other hand, you have the folks who have no regard for the truth, like our "Concerned Regional Pilot," who add nothing to our debates.

CSmith, or whoever, should enjoy their $300,000 a year pay check while it lasts and start career planning for what he, or she, will do after Delta declares bankruptcy. There is no living to be made providing color commentary on the FlightInfo boards, thats fer sure, or the IRS really would be looking into me.

~~~^~~~

 

[MetroSheriff]

I, like inclusive scope, will not tolerate an impostor trying to undercut the solidarity of my pilot group. The mole has been flushed out...again.

ROFLMAO! Are you joking? Don't take yourself so seriously.

Imposter...Mole....what is this the CIA???

 

[FlyComAirJets]

You can put as much or little in your profile as you wish. Scope put XXXs in all the fields which is his choice, no problem there. After all, just about all of us use screen names which grants us a degree of annonymity.

But to state that he is currenty a "concerned regional pilot" when, in fact, he is not, is pretty gutless. I am rather relieved he is not a regional pilot. And I hope he isn't a Delta pilot either since it reflects so poorly on that otherwise fine group.

 

[General Lee]

Come on man, everyone has opinions and this is an anonymous board-----realx a bit.

Bye Bye--General Lee

 

[scopeCMRandASA]

Now come on, General.

He didn't just say he was a "concerned regional pilot." He said quite a few times he flew for Comair. Do a search.
I could care less what his name is, but I care very much that he is not a member of the group he claims to be. Especially when he uses that lie in an attempt to show insolidarity within the Comair group with the intentions of proving his case.

This isn't a case of somebody logging on the same time as somebody else. ScopeCMRandASA has been called out on this several times. Each time, he goes away until it cools down, then back he comes.
His opinions are just that, his opinions, but they are not the opinions of a Comair pilot.

Let it be known;
ScopeCMRandASA does not work for Comair.


Actually, he doesn't go away, he just does not respond, especially when he has been on a trip. There is not reason to. That being said, you need to get your facts straight. I was accused one time before of being FDJ, now it is CSmith. You guys need to make up your minds who I am. Hint: I am neither. My signature line says all you need to know. Apparently you just can't stand one of our own who disagrees with your little RJDC thing, and exposes the truth of what it is. I could really care less what you think of me, because it is the same way I feel about you. Bitter, senior types sums it up.

Whatever you do, don't stick to relevant things. I did ask some buddies to drop him a note, however, so he would know about being falsely accused on this board. Maybe the moderators will wise up a bit.

What a pathetic thread. Is this what this board has become? the good news is that you take the liberty of proving my point, the bitter thing, for me. Thanks.

--a concerned regional pilot

 

[General Lee]

There you go---I think that sums it up. Enjoy!

Bye Bye--General Lee

 

[bvt1151]

proving your point?

You haven't once proven you are a Comair pilot. In fact there have been several times you prove the contrary.

I could care less what you say about the RJDC. I've never backed them and don't plan on doing it any time soon. Once again, just in case you weren't paying attention the first thirty times we said it, this isn't about your opinions, it is about the pilot group you claim to represent.
Perhaps you're confused about what anonimity means.

Anonimity allows somebody to not say who they are. Saying you are somebody you are not is not anonimity, that is a lie.

But, then again, why am I arguing someone with no credibility? That seems pointless.

 

[79%N1]

Once again.....GENERAL, PLEASE GO AWAY!!

 

[General Lee]

79%N1,

thanks for saying PLEASE---but "NO!"

Bye Bye--General Lee

 

[79%N1]

General, you amuse me in that you have nothing better to do than troll the message board of an entity that you are not even a part of, and continue to grace us with your opinions. It could be likened to your trolling a meatcutter or auto mechanic message board and telling the poor meatcutters how it is, or should be --- in the Generals opinion. All you do, ad nauseum, is defend the likes of scopecomaiandasa, fdj, and yourself. WE GET IT! I could write a dissertation on your point of view by now. PLEASE STOP! This is like flightinfoGeneral Lee.com! Or the General LeeRegional board! AAAAAAGGGGHH!!!!!!!