Saudi

[Timebuilder]

I think you left out Paula Abdul, my favorite Arab from my radio days in the 80's...

Seriously, you have to bear in mind that the terrorists didn't care about the scrutiny that arab americans would endure, because to the terrorists, all of those people on the website are just as bad as the rest of us.

The problem is this: there ARE sleeper cells here. When it comes to security, we MUST, if we are logical beings, give more attention to those people who are the likely members of these terrorist cells. Wasn't it gangster John Dillinger who was asked why he robbed banks, and he answered that "that's where the money is"? Since all of the terrorists fall into two easily defined groups, it is a logical extension to expect other terrorists to fall into those categories, too. Not all of them mind you, but a significant number.

In other words, a place to start.

 

[HA25]

I am 100% behind background check of ALL foreign nationals who chose to live here. Once the check is done, however, that needs to be it.

As for checks on people who are already citizens, that is where you get the ACLU out from deep inside me (and I mean deep).

 

[Timebuilder]

I see, and I think you are right.

It won't change until an american citizen has been identified as the participant in our next terror attack. The ACLU will STILL be all up in arms as we try to recover from that episode.

The idea of "civil liberties" has been horribly corrupted by this one organization. Their ideas are predicated on the post-modernist notion that all ideas have a theoretical value of equal merit, and there is no set of absolute ideas of good and evil for a society. If they had their druthers, we would be a socialist country living in near-anarchy conditions.

I am 100% behind background check of ALL foreign nationals who chose to live here. Once the check is done, however, that needs to be it.

What happens when 19 more nut cases decide to join their brothers in paradise by atacking "the infidel" from within, and they have already become citizens?

 

[HA25]

I don't get it, are you saying that we need to monitor all Muslims and Arabs who live in this country at all times even after attaining citizenship (which can take 10 years or more) and passed all background checks?

I think that qualifies as paranoid. Your last statement reads as though you know for a fact that some citizens of the US, of Arab or Muslim background, WILL attack us again. The 19 that did 9/11 were not even close to being citizens, none were even seeking it.

I am glad that Ashcroft is more sensable in this respect.

So far the only internal attacks by citizens were from right-wing whites like McVay, and the Unibomber.

 

[Timebuilder]

I don't get it, are you saying that we need to monitor all Muslims and Arabs who live in this country at all times even after attaining citizenship (which can take 10 years or more) and passed all background checks?

No. I don't mean to say that at all. I DO mean to say that anyone who fits into the same categories as terrorists (using common sense to exclude those who are very unlikely to become involved with terror, such as famous people or senators...) need to be the beginning of additional attention in a security environment such as an airline checkpoint. Checking my grandmother won't stop another terrorist attack, but being unwilling to check others who are far more likely than my grandmother to be involved with terrorist activity is a mistake, and can be considered aiding the terrorist cause.

I think that qualifies as paranoid. Your last statement reads as though you know for a fact that some citizens of the US, of Arab or Muslim background, WILL attack us again. The 19 that did 9/11 were not even close to being citizens, none were even seeking it.

Remember what was said of those who wanted to INCREASE security for aircraft BEFORE 9/11?

They were accused of being paranoid!

Can you give an argument that says that it is unlikely that a US citizen from an arab or muslim group will NOT join the terrorist cause? If no, we are looking at a 50% chance that either one of us is right. Now, what do you suggest that we do about that? I don't like the idea of infringing on the rights of anyone, but I am at a loss to come up with a different solution to this quandry besides increasing the awareness we have concerning groups that could have members who are sympathetic to the terrorist cause. One way might be to sit back and say that it is against our principles as Americans to do anything other than what we are currently doing.

Is what we are doing enough, or should we we doing more?

Are we willing to pay the price for our inability to cope with this threat in a credible manner?

 

[HA25]

I can tell you this, and as I stated before my father (RIP) who worked with the State Dept used to tell me this as well. If the US wants to find someone, this will. Whether you know it or not, we have an amazing intelligence machine, between the NSA/CIA and State Dept, and that just covers "outside" this country(wink..nod).

I personally know a British SAS member who as recently as 3 years ago had Bin Ladin in his sights, we chose to keep Bin Ladin alive. We chose to do a lot of things that the media doesn't report (casue they don't know). You can rest assured that if there is an Arab American in this country that our government has reason to think is suspicious, he is already being watched. No matter what the ACLU or CNN tell you.

I am comfortable with my security as it is today, I am however sick of the TSA and their profile of 1 way last minute business flyers.

 

[Timebuilder]

I agree. ALL of my ticketed flying is one way business. I had to start wearing slip-on loafers because I have to take off my shoes twice to get on board an airplane.

Were you able to ask your dad how those 19 guys got in under the intelligence radar? None of my academy friends in intel are able to explain that to my satisfaction.

You can rest assured that if there is an Arab American in this country that our government has reason to think is suspicious, he is already being watched. No matter what the ACLU or CNN tell you.

I'm more concerned with the ones that are unknown, the ones who decide to act with other "unknowns" in a copy-cat or extremist fashion. How about the dishwasher at the diner named Mohammed who has a bone to pick with us and falls in with a bunch at his mosque who look up to the "bravery" and "dedication" of the 9/11 hijackers, and wishes to join them in "paradise"?

That's the kind of guy that I'm worried about. The guy who is easily mislead and tempted by the praise found in papers from the mideast, where the hijackers are being glorified...

 

[HA25]

My dad had a long life that gave out back in '94 at age 79. He was a full bird colonel in the Army (infantry) and retired in '59 after two wars a purple heart and the Bronze Star. Then served 30 years in the State dept, before retiring again in '90.

As for the sleeper cells, I agree there are possibly some, but you can rest assured they are not as asleep as you are being lead to think(that is they are being watched 24/7).

Also, lets not forget that a Jewish Pediotrist tried to bomb a Afro-American Muslim mosque in FL just last week. This is a problem of extreme religuous nuts, whether Christian, Muslim or Jewish, and not just your friendly local hard working imigrant.

 

[metrodriver]

I heard nobody say anything yet about this Lindt character, you know, the american taliban. The US has been lucky when it comes to terrorism, until 9-11. Europe had to endure many bombings, either from within or outside (IRA in England/ Ireland, ETA in Spain, hijackings in the 70's and 80's, Abu Nidal who blow up a bar in Berlin killing several US servicemen and the attacks on the Vienna and Rome airports, and the Rote Armee in Germany).What scares me in this country are the militia, like on Ruby Ridge, Idaho, and the clan in Waco, Texas. These people are a lot harder to track, and some have tactics similar to what the clowns in afghanistan had. That's why I would like to see background checks for everyone, US citizen or not. Do it without the 45 day waiting period like the current one for non-citizens, this makes a lot of airlines simply closing the doors for these people (which is illegal, but it's hard to prove)

 

[HA25]

I am for a manditory background check on ALL people who want to ride a jet in the US under FAR 121. I say make them do it once, for free, then issue them a travel id card, and if they don't have it at the security check point, they don't go.

End of discussion