Flight_Line
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2002
- Posts
- 83
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
rtmcfi said:It is pretty much the same as the Mesa/Freedom thing. Same sort of scumbags under the skin.....
qxpilot27 said:The problem with this operation is you have guys bringing down the industry by working for lousy wages and work rules. The are bypassing existing carriers and their pilot contracts to fly a shiny new jets and get a quick upgrade. When people like this continue to work for companies like ho jets, it gives other airlines the idea that they can pull off an alter ego carrier too. Where will it stop? Before you know it, we will all get sucked into this crap. Some guys need to see the big picture and get on with a respectable airline so we can put a stop to this sh!t.
elcapitan said:Pretty much you are wrong and you are just out to flamebait and do some mudslinging. You are way off base and you don't understand their situation at all. You don't know the facts or what happened at all.
Freedom was created to be a non-union carrier because JO did not like unions. GJ was not formed as a non-union carrier. It was started because TSA was limited to 50-seats per the APA Scope clause. I don't think Hulas the K would have spent all that money to start up another airline unless he had to. GJ is a separate airline as opposed to Freedom which was not found to be a separate airline from MESA. It is all in the the National Mediation Board ruling which you can read for yourself. If GJ had not been found to be a separate airline they would be paying fines to APA just like Republic had to. This minor detail cost them about 1 million dollars a month. Ask any American pilot about the nice check they got from the fines for the violation of their scope clause. I bet B.B. could not sleep at night with that much money going out the door. It probably really cut into his bonus. It is tough trying to scrape by on 600,000 per year.
elcapitan said:No, I am just tired of people not knowing the facts and spreading hatred and innuendo for a situation they just dont understand.
Fact 1. GJet was created to meet the United Express Contract for 70-Seaters.
Fact 2. TSA could not fly those jets because they are limited to 50-seats per the APA scope.
Fact 3. ALPA Challenged the formation of Freedom Air and the NMB Ruled that it was not a separate airline.
Fact 4: ALPA Challenged the formation of GJet and the NMB Ruled that they were separate airlines.
Fact 5: The NMB ruled that since they were separate and distinct airlines the Gjets pilots could organize with any union and that included ALPA.
Fact 6: If TSA had tried to fly those airplanes or ALPA had won the ruling that GJet was not a separate airline then TSAH would be fined about 1 million dollars a month.
Fact 6: TSA being a union airline had to negotiate for the pilot lists of the two separate airlines to be merged under one list.
Fact 7: The TSA pilot MEC negotiated a TA with TSAH management to merge the pilot lists with the GJets pilots on the bottom of the seniority list.
The TSA pilot group voted NO to this agreement.
Fact 8: The Gjet pilot group voted in the Teamsters union to represent them.
I seriously don't know how you equate anything that went on there with "moral" character and "integrity". That someone can't make good decisions in the cockpit. I think this is a very far stretch. Based on the facts above to equate this situation as the "downfall" of the whole industry also doesn't make any sense.
elcapitan said:I seriously don't know how you equate anything that went on there with "moral" character and "integrity".
Cookie Monster said:TSA pilots are not stupid and they made the right decision.
h25b said:No arguement here... But you can't have it both ways. You are either for the collective bargaining process or you aren't. You get what you negotiate. You couldn't negotiate the 70 seat flying, so you don't get it. If you weren't able to come to terms with the company it is no other pilots' fault but your own.
TSA holdings had to obtain another operating certificate which allowed them to have bargaining power. No one can say they started the other certificate soley to screw the TSA pilots. It just so happens that this one just one of the benefits that came from it. Also exactly what happened to the CHQ pilots.
redbook said:speaking out of both sides of your mouth yet again.
Couldn't come to terms? They gave us an ultimatum. We chose to fight. Unified. (75% of what pilot group has voted no in the last few years?) Part of that fight involves getting the truth out about the whipsaw created by g0jet and the scumbags who staff it or defend it. (which is one and the same)
h25b said:Again you're unable to directly refute any part of my arguement. Bottom line, you got what you negotiated, you chose to "fight" and lost. Now get over it.
redbook said:No thank you management/g0jet pilots, We will not "get over it".
h25b said:Again you're unable to directly refute any part of my arguement. Bottom line, you got what you negotiated, you chose to "fight" and lost. Now get over it.
h25b said:Good luck with that strategy, it's worked out so well for you so far....![]()
redbook said:By your logic we should have "gotten over " Pearl Harbor. No thanks.
h25b said:Forgotten ??? NO Got over it ??? Yeah, I believe we have. Last time I checked most of us were driving Japanese cars. So I believe we've gotten over it, we just haven't forgotten.
Originally posted by h25b: You see they have to see it this way because if they handled it any other way they'd have to admit that they simply just f'd up the negotiations and would have to blame their union/themselves. Bottom line is they didn't learn anything from the CHQ pilots. The CHQ pilots realized they'd have to take less than stellar payrates to secure the Republic flying and simply put, the TSA pilots didn't feel such a sacrifice was worth it...
Lav Service said:This comment implies that YOU and CHQ both came to the same correct realization while TSA did not. This is for future reference for you and your fellow GJ employees.
We feel (as does QX) that your company is a union-busting whipsaw being used against TSA pilots. Since we do not recognize you as a ligitimate company, we currently do not, nor do we ever intend to institude any sort of reciprocal jumpseat agreement with you. The circumstances that led to CHQ obtaining 70 seat flying with one seniority list were far different than yours (were you here when it happened).
Frankly, it is offensive that you in any way would imply (directly or indirectly) that GJ and CHQ pilots are in any way similar. The fact is that we did what we thought we had to do at the time for the good of our ENTIRE current pilot group. TSA pilots made their decision based on what they thought was the best choice for their pilot group. If you are former TSA you should be ashamed of yourself, for you know your management. If you are new to TSH then you are in no position to offer any opinion at all (least of all on CHQ). You made your decision for you own PERSONAL benefit. If, as I suspect, you are ex-TSA your decision can only stand as gross personal greed.
You have a right to defend yourself as anyone would. However, don't compare GJ and CHQ. We are not the same. We do not want to be identified with you in any way nor do we support you. It's bad enough that you are now part of our union.
You obviously have a reading deficiency because nowhere did I compare GJ's to CHQ. I compared the situation the TSA pilot group was in to the issue that the CHQ group was facing while negotiating the current CBA in the face of the Republic Airlines threat. In this case, they were very much in the same boat the TSA pilots were in. However, the CHQ pilots gave up significant demands in terms of payscales in favor of securing the Republic 70 seat flying under their own seniority list.
h25b said:You obviously have a reading deficiency because nowhere did I compare GJ's to CHQ. I compared the situation the TSA pilot group was in to the issue that the CHQ group was facing while negotiating the current CBA in the face of the Republic Airlines threat. In this case, they were very much in the same boat the TSA pilots were in. However, the CHQ pilots gave up significant demands in terms of payscales in favor of securing the Republic 70 seat flying under their own seniority list.
Lav Service said:BTW, the decision TSA pilots made is no excuse for any GJ pilot. You all made your decisions for you OWN reasons, not because of the actions of TSA. If you did, you're dumb.
I'm out.
flyer172r said:It's not quite accurate to say that TSA pilots passed on the GJ flying. It's more accurate to say that TSA pilots didn't agree to a POS offer (and by offer I mean take-it-or-leave-it ultimatum) and decided to try to resolve the situation in contract negotiations. Negotiations made very difficult by GJ's existence. Just because it's legal doesn't mean it's right.