Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Rumor: Skywest to fly 737-300s for UAL

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Heavy Set

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 28, 2002
Posts
2,277
Rumor alert!

I was talking to some Skywest crew members at SFO today and heard that Skywest MIGHT (emphasis on MIGHT) get some used 737-300's (or -500's) from United and use them on negotiated United routes on behalf of United Express. The crew was pretty certain about the rumor and evidently it originated from Brad Holt (the VP of Flt Ops). I can't confirm it...

So, what do you think - could this be a legit rumor? Do you think United furloughees would be flying these 733s as FOs? They supposedly have that arrangement for the future 70 seaters - J4J....
 
This rumor (us getting 737's) has been circulating around the company for awhile. I think SkyWest has been exploring many different scenarios during this uncertain period in the airline business. I think it is very unlikely that we will see an aircraft of that size on our property in the near future simply because I believe that SkyWest would prefer to stick with their current business model. If we were to get 737's I would guess that it would be to fly them on our own. Having said that, as we all know, anything is possible in this crazy business. For those of us that are starting face the reality of being at SkyWest for our careers, it's a nice rumor.
 
Um...actually skywest has payrates for 737s. They're not great, but they're better than 50 seat pay.

"Nice job guys."

At least SkyWest didn't ratify concessions.
 
meanstreak said:
So if you do fly them are you going to fly them at 50 seat pay rates. Nice job guys.

HEHEHE! Ouch.

Play nice, guys. :)
 
meanstreak said:
So if you do fly them are you going to fly them at 50 seat pay rates. Nice job guys.



Perhaps you should get your facts straight before you rip on us. WE HAVE rates for the 737, and they are MUCH BETTER than our 50 & 70 seat rates.


At least you named yourself appropriately.
 
This is exactly going as planned. All of us UAX beoootches battling it out on the street corner while the United pimps count the cash...believe me, they haaaaaaaaave the cash.

They only guarantee in the contract is that free vasaline will be provided during the entire 5 year contracted period. How is it going to feel, jumpseating on our fellow ALPA member's aircraft trying to explain this one?

Stay informed, stay bent over, and stay lubed up...

House
 
House_X said:
They only guarantee in the contract is that free vasaline will be provided during the entire 5 year contracted period.
House


How the hell did you guys get FREE VASALINE!!! :o

LUCKY, LUCKY BA$TARDS! :o
 
Let's see. If I went from RJ captain to 737 captain that would be a 35.00 per hour raise. Multiply that times about an 80 hour month. That works out to a 2800.00 raise. That's one more house I can buy and rent out. You guys make it sound so terrible. You must be spending all your money on beer. My wife doesn't work, my only job is Skywest, and I already own two houses in California. What are you doing wrong?
 
I think the problem is that you would be drastically undercutting the rest of the industry. You would be taking great jobs and turning them into ok jobs. Who cares how many houses you have? The fact is you would be working for a fraction of what you are worth. Obviously most of you guys could not care less.
 
1900FO
To a point I agree with you. I differ on what you intimate as us ruining the industry. Any operator who pays less than the top salary is ruining the industry to follow the path you have laid down. Is an America West pilot ruining it for everyone because he accepted a job knowing he was going to make alot less than other operators on the same equipment? I use AW as an example, you can fill in other airlines as you like. I voted no on the TA here because we will be be flying essentially the same plane with 20 more seats for the same price. Flying RJ's is something in SkyWests core, they know how to do it and make money. I do feel cheated on the RJ issue, and I believe we let others down as it relates to RJ flying. Its another story if we were to fly the 737 (which I have to believe will never happen) I wanted to give management the time to spool up and figure out how to do it right. A regional making the jump from just that to something vastly different needs the time and concessions to make it work. I could be wrong, but not many airlines make such a drastic jump and pay top of the line wages on day one. Especially in the atmosphere we were expecting to fly them(post liquidation of UA, flying under our own name)
 
Southwest has been undercutting the major carriers for years to the point where everyone was trying to imitate them. Part of that was due to the lower wages paid at Southwest. That's why United shuttle came about. The shuttle pay was a little less than mainline pay. So does everybody hate Southwest? No, they love Southwest. Now the only way the majors can stay in business is to cut wages at their own carrier and mandate that the regionals do the same. So are we realy to blame? Probably in your eyes. I could care less. While you are all crying I'm going to be making good decisions based on all available information. Southwest is taking market share and believe me, they are not worried about the rest of the pilots in the country.

As far as being paid what you are worth. Nobody knows what you are worth. Not even you.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom