Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Rumor re: NJA domiciles

  • Thread starter Thread starter NJApilot
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 21

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Additionally:

13.2(c)(iv)


In the event the Company closes a Domicile, any crewmember using


the Domicile at the time of closure may continue to use the airport as his HBA; provided that such airport qualifies as an HBA pursuant to Section 13.1(c). ....​



So if the company chose to close ALL the Domiciles. Effectively ending the Domicile program. 100% of the pilots would be HBA pilots.​



What stops the company from closing all domiciles?​
 
Last edited:
gunfyter said:
Yes I did.

Nothing restricts the company from having more than 30% HBA... IN THE WHOLE PARAGRAPH.

If the company chooses to restrict HBAs to 30% ... there still may be more than 30% because of those of us grandfathered in to HBAs. -- This is the situation that exists today.

Nothing says the company may NOT allow more than 30% on HBA.

Such percentage may be less than thirty (30) if crewmembers designate Domiciles, or more than thirty (30) percent because of grandfather rights as defined in Section 13.1(a).


So what does this mean? It can be below 30% if more than 70% of the pilots are domicile based and dont use hba. It can only be above 30% because of the grandfathered pilots.
 
FLYLOW22 said:
I'm just posing a question... Are we getting the ripest tomatoes off the vine or are we being forced to pick a several that aren't quite ready yet.

Judging by some of the comments coming from FSI sources and a few in the NJ training department, I think there is no question that the overall quality has gone down. This is not to in any way put down those that have been hired recently - but the fact is, NetJets has been extremely fortunate over the last 4-5 years to hire candidates with lots of jet experience and a high degree of training (ie, airlines and military). There is very little dispute over this, I think most will agree. With the added component of domicile basing, it has clearly cut down on the number of pilots who are interested in applying to NetJets. I'm sure that each and every one of us currently on property can name a few pilots that we know of personally that would like to work for us - and are highly qualified - but refuse, from the outset, to even apply because of the domicile restriction. It's a non-starter for many.

A higher percentage of the newhire pilots today are having problems during type school (even though FSI makes it almost impossible to fail), and more notably, are having problems during the transition to the line, including during IOE. As the training department re-tools to place NetJets instructors in the sims for LOFT training (post-type ride), I think we'll be hearing a lot more about the decreasing quality of the newhires and the problems that result from that in the training pipeline (can we say, "needs additional training"?). Again, this is not a put-down for those currently being hired....but the fact is, for many years, we've been hiring candidates with 6-7000 hrs TT (most of that in turbojet aircraft) and that level of experience really shows during NJA training.

If I had to guess, I would say that NJA will NOT ease the hiring restrictions until they absolutely have to....which may be months or years down the road.

I have not heard this rumor being discussed anymore over the last few days, so I'm guessing that maybe it is just another one of "those" rumors.
 
Also, to add to the discussion about the CBA language, my understanding is that the company can - on its own - allow as many pilots as it wants to use the HBA system of basing.

The company, on the other hand, CANNOT require more than 30% to use the domicile system. As we know, it will take a long time to reach the 30% threshold when you factor in the roughly 2200 (I think it is...just a guess) pilots currently using HBAs under the grandfather clause. Once we hit 30%, pilots in the domicile system can start bailing to HBAs.

My hope is that we will never have to reach that point, and the company will be forced to offer a better system for newhire basing. I also hope that it doesn't take an accident for the company to wake up and realize that we need to hire the absolute best this industry has to offer, in order to preserve our current level of safety and service.
 
Reading Between The Lines

be-400xpdriver said:
Such percentage may be less than thirty (30) if crewmembers designate Domiciles, or more than thirty (30) percent because of grandfather rights as defined in Section 13.1(a).


So what does this mean? It can be below 30% if more than 70% of the pilots are domicile based and dont use hba. It can only be above 30% because of the grandfathered pilots.





What does it mean? It means:
13.1(b)

The Company may limit Crewmember participation in the Home Base Airport system to thirty (30) percent of total number of Crewmembers on the most current seniority list, including crewmembers who have relinquished Home Base Airport rights pursuant to section 13.2(b).

IF THE COMPANY DOES ELECT TO LIMIT TO 30%

THEN:


Such percentage may be less than thirty (30) if crewmembers designate Domiciles, or more than thirty (30) percent because of grandfather rights as defined in Section 13.1(a).

BUT IF THE COMPANY DOES NOT LIMIT HBAs TO 30%... then there is NO LIMIT to the number of HBA pilots.




"May limit" does not = MUST limit

If you have board access please click this link

http://www.ibt1108.org/netjets/boards/showthread.php?t=16439&highlight=HBA+relief

Then let me know if we are still in disagreement.
 
Last edited:
NJApilot said:
Judging by some of the comments coming from FSI sources and a few in the NJ training department, I think there is no question that the overall quality has gone down. This is not to in any way put down those that have been hired recently - but the fact is, NetJets has been extremely fortunate over the last 4-5 years to hire candidates with lots of jet experience and a high degree of training (ie, airlines and military). There is very little dispute over this, I think most will agree. With the added component of domicile basing, it has clearly cut down on the number of pilots who are interested in applying to NetJets. I'm sure that each and every one of us currently on property can name a few pilots that we know of personally that would like to work for us - and are highly qualified - but refuse, from the outset, to even apply because of the domicile restriction. It's a non-starter for many.

A higher percentage of the newhire pilots today are having problems during type school (even though FSI makes it almost impossible to fail), and more notably, are having problems during the transition to the line, including during IOE. As the training department re-tools to place NetJets instructors in the sims for LOFT training (post-type ride), I think we'll be hearing a lot more about the decreasing quality of the newhires and the problems that result from that in the training pipeline (can we say, "needs additional training"?). Again, this is not a put-down for those currently being hired....but the fact is, for many years, we've been hiring candidates with 6-7000 hrs TT (most of that in turbojet aircraft) and that level of experience really shows during NJA training.

If I had to guess, I would say that NJA will NOT ease the hiring restrictions until they absolutely have to....which may be months or years down the road.

I have not heard this rumor being discussed anymore over the last few days, so I'm guessing that maybe it is just another one of "those" rumors.


I was in a class about 7 months ago of about 30 people. Although about 20 of those were from Independence, I would say that 28 if not more of the pilots in my class had considerable jet experience as well as pic jet. Seemed like a very experienced group including retired Delta and Northwest. That, however, is only one class so i'm not sure what kind of guys they are hiring now.
 
SAEflyer said:
I was in a class about 7 months ago of about 30 people. Although about 20 of those were from Independence, I would say that 28 if not more of the pilots in my class had considerable jet experience as well as pic jet. Seemed like a very experienced group including retired Delta and Northwest. That, however, is only one class so i'm not sure what kind of guys they are hiring now.


No doubt, I think your class is more or less an example of the kind of new hire class we hope to have. However - and it's totally just a guess on my part - I think the circumstances have changed somewhat over the course of the last 7 months. It will take more time before we can know for sure whether this is in fact the case.

Those pilots coming from organizations that have (or had, in the case of Independence) a solid training program in place should be our target demographic for new hires. I'm afraid that's not the road we are heading down right now, unfortunately, and I fear that we are turning away a lot of good people and "filling seats" with candidates who are lesser qualified. In my opinion, this is directly attributable to the basing restrictions placed on new hires today.

In no way do I mean to infer that those without prior airline or military experience aren't qualified enough to come here, or that they won't be welcome. I've flown with many top-notch pilots here that had only a corporate aviation background. But having been an IOE capt in my fleet for some time, I do know that, as a general rule, those that have a solid training background prior to coming to NetJets adapt very well to our type of operation, they do so quicker, and generally have an easier time during training. I would like to see our past hiring trends (of the last 5 years) continue for the forseeable future.

Anyway, just my 2 cents, for what it's worth...
 
There is absolutely no plans by the Company to add domiciles. The 30% thing is so far away the Company has yet to even establish a method to determine the math. Hate to break the news.

This is typical with a new contract and work rules. First there are optimistic rumors, which after some time, turn to bitterness, which then rolls into our next barganing cycle.

If the membership feels that domiciles are important enough to bargain for, they will be bargained for. It's all up to you. Don't hold your breath for the Company to "do the right thing" and provide relief for your commute. Driving right by service centers and perfectly good working airports is something we have been doing for years here at NJA and the Company is content to allow you to suffer for them to achieve their end game of saving $$$$ on the next CBA.
 
How about the guys with 20,000hrs heavy time but when a suv full of bags pull up the horror on their face is priceless. :)
 
NJApilot said:
A higher percentage of the newhire pilots today are having problems during type school (even though FSI makes it almost impossible to fail), and more notably, are having problems during the transition to the line, including during IOE. As the training department re-tools to place NetJets instructors in the sims for LOFT training (post-type ride), I think we'll be hearing a lot more about the decreasing quality of the newhires and the problems that result from that in the training pipeline (can we say, "needs additional training"?). Again, this is not a put-down for those currently being hired....but the fact is, for many years, we've been hiring candidates with 6-7000 hrs TT (most of that in turbojet aircraft) and that level of experience really shows during NJA training.

I am curently flying the CRJ at a 121 carrier. I will have about 2000 Hrs on the Jet when I plan to apply to NJ. Will I be behind the power curve? I will admit that the transtion from the Baron to the Jet was difficult. Is it guys with no jet time that are having trouble? Or is it just the wrong attitude? Not enough time on line? Whats the qualification?
 
A-V-8 said:
I am curently flying the CRJ at a 121 carrier. I will have about 2000 Hrs on the Jet when I plan to apply to NJ. Will I be behind the power curve? I will admit that the transtion from the Baron to the Jet was difficult. Is it guys with no jet time that are having trouble? Or is it just the wrong attitude? Not enough time on line? Whats the qualification?

Why are you going to wait to apply. Apply now. Get the process started.

As far as the "transition" goes, just my opinion, but you should do just fine. I think the biggest problems are experience and common sense.

But the previous comment about the SUV full of bags is not only funny, but oh so true.
 
I think he needs 900 more TT hrs.

I think the guys who flew night freight adjust to the line the quickest. Used to getting jacked around.

Military to airline ... I barely knew what an FBO was before I got here. I use to think airplanes ran on JP4... not Coffee ice and papers.

Call ahead for ground trans?
 
A "higher percentage of new hires are having trouble" is a comment that doesn't really paint the whole picture.

Never in the history of NJA has there been hiring at these proportions for this long of a period, so it is only to be expected that the number of "issues" we have increases.

If you do the math, and look at the checkride issues for new hires or IOE issues, you will find that they are hardly any worse than in the past, in fact are probably much better.

I can count on on hand the number of new hires since Jan 2006 that have "washed" out.

Also, you might be surprised at who has difficulty. It isn't the CRJ guys. It's the guys at the opposite ends of the spectrum: Those with too little experience (meaning, no glass, no jet, no crew time, etc) and those with too much experience (meaning retired Airline guys with three pairs of glasses and trouble learning new ways and keeping up with the pace).

My examples above are purely generic, and don't anyone take any offense. Like I said, the people who have washed out were really special cases.

The Union has a very high level of involvement in every case such as these, and even though the pilots are on Probation, the Company ensures they check every box before "discharge."

When more and more management folks and Union folks are climbing into your sim and/or aircraft each successive attempt at passing a checkride, you can be sure they are getting their ducks in a row for termination.

Like I said, of the over 600 pilots hired this year alone, only a HANDFULL have not made it.
 
A-V-8 said:
I am curently flying the CRJ at a 121 carrier. I will have about 2000 Hrs on the Jet when I plan to apply to NJ. Will I be behind the power curve? I will admit that the transtion from the Baron to the Jet was difficult. Is it guys with no jet time that are having trouble? Or is it just the wrong attitude? Not enough time on line? Whats the qualification?

I second what SkiandSurf says, if you have the mins get your stuff in now. I put my stuff in last Jan and due to my domicile pref. I am just now getting the interview. If you wait like I did you first domicile choice might fill up or something else and you could wait like me. Best of luck.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom