canadflyau
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 2, 2002
- Posts
- 437
From what I understand, ALG signed the TA that U wanted on the 11th hour before they filed for BK. But on Aug 24th after the lawyers went over it with a fine toothed comb, they (UGroup) rejected the TA they asked ALG pilots for. I heard the problem was the succesorship language. ALG succesorship language said if they were bought, sold, merged with anyone other than PDT, PSA, MDA, or U then the original contract would be intact in full. Any thoughts on this wierd turn of events....
Also, any court that would allow U to start purchasing SJ's before paying creditors would be a farse and would be going against standard practice at this point in the game. I think the Reuters article sited is the most accurate account, don't expect to see SJ's until the final stages of BK. my .02
Also, any court that would allow U to start purchasing SJ's before paying creditors would be a farse and would be going against standard practice at this point in the game. I think the Reuters article sited is the most accurate account, don't expect to see SJ's until the final stages of BK. my .02