skydiverdriver
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 869
I'm not sure I could explain it in one sentence, just as you couldn't pose your questions that way. However, first of all, the RJDC is NOT about eliminating scope. Some people who don't understand their goals will tell you that, but who in their right mind would follow such a course? Scope is a very important part of any union contract, and what they are trying to do is change the way it's used, not eliminate it.
Do you think ALPA has a responsability to treat all of it's members the same? Well it does, and the RJDC lawsuit is intended to get the union to follow it's own bylaws and the laws of the country in which we live.
I'm not going to get into all of the specifics, because that has been hashed over numerous times. If you want more detail, just do a search on the rjdc or posts by flydeltasjets or surplus1, and you will hear both sides of the arguement. I hope this helps you, and good luck.
Do you think ALPA has a responsability to treat all of it's members the same? Well it does, and the RJDC lawsuit is intended to get the union to follow it's own bylaws and the laws of the country in which we live.
I'm not going to get into all of the specifics, because that has been hashed over numerous times. If you want more detail, just do a search on the rjdc or posts by flydeltasjets or surplus1, and you will hear both sides of the arguement. I hope this helps you, and good luck.