N2264J said:
Not one. Not one rational counter point to any issue raised in the update.
Ask and ye shall receive.
1. ALPA Exposes its Vulnerability on 90-Seat Issue, but Ignores Reasons Why
Not much to respond to on this one. The RJDC just draws the wrong conclusions from Woerth's statement. Duane simply said that there would be no scope relief on 90 seat aircraft. Period. The only way it will happen will be in the courts. Basically, he's saying that the only way the scope relief will happen is if it is forced on us by a bankruptcy court. How this validates the RJDC's kooky theories I have no idea.
2. ALPA’s “Legacy” Carriers Face New Wave of Concessionary Bargaining
The pilots at the majors have every right to bargain on scope. It is not a violation of your "rights" as a regional pilot and it is not a violation of DFR. Northwest pilots own all flying done under the NW code, so it's up to them too decide who flies what.
3. Northwest MEC Reaffirms Claim to all 70-seat Flying
Thank God that the NW pilots have the balls to do this. The last thing I want is a bunch of 70 or 90 seaters at Pinnacle or Mesaba. I'd be stuck at this godforsaken airline forever as all the new flying is transferred to the regionals. XJ and 9E have no claim to this flying whatsoever. The mainline pilots do. Their contract is the only contract that has any control over the NW code. As such, the NW pilots are free to negotiate what flying is allowed at the regional code-share partners. I support them 100% in keeping the flying at mainline. DFR violation? I think not.
4. Express Jet Pilots Unilaterally Restricted by ALPA to 50-Seat Jets
Just what don't you understand here?
CoEx pilots do not work for Continental!!! They work for CoEx. They have no claim to any flying under the CO code. Only the CAL pilots do. They get to decide who gets what, and thanfully they have drawn the line in the sand at 50 seats. Please explain to me why you think that you are entitled to any flying from your mainline partner.
5. Mainline Small Jet Restrictions Give Birth to yet another “Regional” Alter Ego
GoJets is a result of union busting, not scope. TSA wants to break the back of ALPA. Scope has nothing to do with this. If you can't see this then you're dumber than J.C. Lawson. (and that's pretty dang dumb)
6. ALPA’s Strategic Plan Ignores Union’s Failures and Endorses Current Scope Practice
More of the same. You don't own flying, stop pretending that you do. How many times do we have to tell you this before it finally sinks in? If you want some control over the DL code, then earn it: get a job by interviewing when they start hiring again. Otherwise, stop yer whining.
7. Small Jet Operators Flex Financial Muscles
This is all about bad management at the legacy carriers and relatively good management at the regionals. The regional carriers until now have been able to get guaranteed profits by charging a fee-for-departure that ensures a profit no matter how many people are actually carried. The gates, fuel, insurance, and even airplanes are often paid for by the mainline carrier. If you can't make a healthy profit running a business like that, then you need to go back to business school. Again, this has nothing to do with scope and "predatory bargaining."