ultrarunner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 4,322
Yep, sure does. But in your latter scenario, the BK judge would take the place of the pres. And, as you know, the BK judge is going to attempt to act in the best interest of the creditor and shareholder.
Since Citi isn't going the BK route, but asking for a taxpayer handout, the Pres needs to have that interjection. I'm ok with that.
But what I'm NOT ok with is these same Corp. buffoons still watching over then hen-house. I think the this is an excellent opportunity to clean-house at the top, and put folks in place that don't mind being held accountable.
Since Citi isn't going the BK route, but asking for a taxpayer handout, the Pres needs to have that interjection. I'm ok with that.
But what I'm NOT ok with is these same Corp. buffoons still watching over then hen-house. I think the this is an excellent opportunity to clean-house at the top, and put folks in place that don't mind being held accountable.
Last edited:
