Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Republics E-170s replacing Midwests flying! WTF

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Your Midwest Airline pilot friend is not on the street because of Republic.. He is on the street because

* Failed Midwest Airline leadership to remain competitive in a very tough airline industry

* Poor Midwest passenger load factor

* A current US Bad Economy..

Republic flying and its loan is a last ditch to keep this ailing airline alive for a few more months..

You flightinfo pilot cyber warriors get all angry over the wrong people. Failed leadership, mismanagement, lack of vision, a poor business plan are the culprits. Hold your CEOs and management accountable while they bank the millions into their bank accounts!
Erik,

agreed. But there is no talking to these idiots. All they want is to be able to point their stubby little fingers at someone else.
 
One thing you are all forgetting. Republic saved Midwest pilots from not having an airline to work for. Keeping some at work is better than none at all. If RAH had not thrown money their way there would be no Midwest pilots versus a portion and that portion will be recalled as soon as the 170's get put on their cert. It is a sore subject, yes, but this works out in the best case scenario for both airlines. Business. If we go by your arguments, then Midwest doors would be closed for good. You knuckleheads are in such a hurry to call others scabs (and not even use the term correctly) and YOU are part of the problem just as anyone is. If you are flying a regional plane, YOU, are part of the problem.

On behalf of myself, and the Midwest pilots.....Thank you so much for your hard work.
 
And how quickly did they cash the check from RAH? they only had a couple of days $ to operate. That company is way too top heavy with MGT folks... how many people in the inflight dept. do you need for like 120 FAs?????
 
See Erik? Lol Told ya !

Your right. Last time I checked, pilots never made management decisions for their company.

Cyber-flight info warriors seem to think that pilots are the directly responsible for and the final authority of the management actions of the company they work for!!
 
In CMH on Sunday, 05 Oct. and the Republic jumpseater was supprised to see a 170 in midwest colors already. Wish I had a pic..
 
Knowing my state of economics and knowing my educational background and knowing what I can go back into. YES!!! I would give my job up for my "Brother".

Then do it. Turn in your letter of resignation to your CP. Come back here and tell us your last day so we can get the water canons loaded.
 
WRONG!!!
My original statement is.. IT'S LIKE FLYING STRUCK ROUTES.. IT'S NOT THE SAME THING!!!
Your syntax is off. You can't say it's "like" something when the very definition of what you're saying it's "like" is incongruous.

Struck work requires willful withholding of services by an organized group...either for self-help or wildcat.

Locked out work isn't technically "struck" work b/c the withholding of service is "forced" by management.

To SCAB is to cross a line that was set up by LABOR. To work "replacement" work is to work a void created by MGT.

If the YX crews had struck, then the RAH crews would be working struck work--and scabbing. There is no work action by YX.

It's not "like" anything.

I know I don't have to spell it out like this for you and please don't be insulted by it; but I'm trying to explain to you why people are resistant to your using a simile incorrectly. "Like" isn't "Is."
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom