Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Regarding Scope

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Kugelblitz

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Posts
287
I was having a conversation with my 10 year old son the other day which inadvertently illuminated the scope debate for me and thought I would pass my insights along. No I am no expert, I do have a life and don't refer to this website everyday, and I couldn't tell you the last time I picked up a magazine about flying. I am, as of today, a pilot for United Continental Holdings, Inc. Hoo-f*n- Rah. With this turn of events I am now with my 7th named air carrier, 2 of which I came into by way of merger or acquisition. I have around 4 1/2 years regional/commuter experience with the likes of Air Midwest, TranStates, and Comair.

My son, who is a gold select 10u baseball player was informing me that when Albert Pujols retires from the Cardinals in about 10 years he should be ready to take over for him. I thought that was just super, please don't forget dad when you sign the big contract. What caught my attention was how my son stated he was going to play for the Cardinals. Now we go see a local minor league team called the Rascals, whom he dearly loves, but that was not his goal, to play for an unaffiliated A ball team. I asked him about playing for the Rascals and he said he would only do that for a little while, but he needed to move up to the majors because that is what baseball players do (or try to do I thought).

Of course many of you by now see where I am going. I fear some of you feel a sense of derogatoriness to this idea. But bear with me and maintain an open mind, I am not trying to flame-bait nor insult. Only make a point, that one part of the problem that we are facing in the industry is dealing with reclaiming routes flown by major airlines for years that are recently (last 20 years or so) being flown at the regional level and the impact such reversions to the majors have on the livelihoods of career regional pilots.

The problem here, it seems to me, is that there is a population of pilots who have found a comfy place at what in baseball terms amounts to a AAA or AA team and doesn't want to move. However, unlike in the baseball world, one can linger at these levels and not worry about being pushed out by management because of an inability (in this case an unwillingness) to move up. The argument undoubtedly proffered by those who have made this decision would be the vicissitudes of major airline employment the last decade or so, the seniority perks they get with holidays and other such scheduling issues, and no need to fly big equipment for the sake of flying big equipment.

Alex Rodriguez could have made very similar arguments had he been happy at the triple A level of the Seattle Mariners system many years ago. Had he stubbornly insisted on staying put, he would have missed out on around $300 million dollars which he has estimated to make to date. Choosing to stay at a level below what is considered by most to be the top makes little sense in the long run, no matter what logic one uses.

Job security for the senior pilots at regionals is only a temporary phenomenon, relatively speaking, due to the impacts of 9-11 on the major airlines who bore the brunt of the effects of the attack on passenger air travel. Now that things are changed, the reality of regional airlines as 3rd party, completely dependent entities is coming to the fore very quickly. The lack of any route authority and equipment owned and alloted by the major partner illustrates that increased or even commensurate job security at the regionals is illusory. The inevitable whipsaw of multiple regional partners with the same major airline has had devestating effects on many of my former Comair colleagues who made very rational arguments for their insistence on 10, 15 and even 20+ year careers with that carrier. Those arguments are no consolation to the senior pilots there now.

Those pilots that have stagnated themselves, and I know this isn't always through one's own choosing (a.k.a 9-11), has created this difficult situation where reasonably senior regional pilots making okay money don't want to lose what they have. In other professions this isn't a problem, there is a weeding out process that keeps things moving in the what are normally nascent career stages that we don't have in place here. Not that weeding out has any bearing on competency, but either you move up when the opportunity avails or someone will move you. If the inability to move up is due to educational, legal, or medical reasons, time to move on and let someone else have a whack at it. We used to do that with age 60, remember?

There is no easy answer for those of you who insist on staying put at the regional level. As a mainline pilot I am not going to sit around and watch you fly larger and larger aircraft. Where you say I am unfair because I am trying to scope you out of a job by not letting you fly, say 70 seaters, I find no one on your side having ethics problems taking larger and larger airplanes. Nowadays you are essentially flying DC-9s, what is to stop you from flying 727 equivalents or greater down the road? You? I doubt it.

It would seem self-evident that bringing flying back to mainline creates mainline jobs. Yes, like all new-hires you must go to the bottom of the list and throw the gear for someone again. That is how the system works. Don't like it? Get out of the industry, because the industry hinges on people moving up, not sitting fat at some intermediate level. Sorry, but that is just the nature of the beast.
 
Last edited:
Glad to hear your son doesn't want to be a pilot!!!! Hope he makes it to the show. We as union pilots have only so much leverage with our managements who seem to only want to do one thing and that is outsource the work. It does seem though that there finally is some momentum with numerous major airline pilot groups to get our flying back.
 
He who holds the gold, rules.

He who pays the piper, calls the tune.

This is managements fault. Not the struggling Triple-A guy. He's not more than a pawn. His range of choices are dictated by those who own the means to capital. This is not a free will situation. If he's talented enough, knows the right people, has an "in," prepares prepares prepares, whatever; then this AAA/RJ lifer may be able to move up to a Major. However, like musical chairs, there's only so many seats to be occupied... even for the best of dancers. Even in good times. Its a fact of life that some will never move out of a Regional or advance to the major leagues. Whether it be due to comfort (QOL, COL, etc.) or inability (skill, personality), many choose to stay. Its a random gamble and nothing else. Aside from management, external factors (9/11, recession) overwhelmingly affect and negate any personal drive or motivation one has for advancing to a regional.
 
When I first started in this biz I was shocked at the way pilots treated each other. In the early 90's when the AA pilots tried to show a little unity in their fight to keep their jobs and wore "SCOPE" cards beneath their ID's the Eagle pilots openly mocked them by wearing "LISTERINE" under theirs and were openly hostile to the AA pilots. When ACA wanted RJ's but at first couldn't fly them as UEX because of mainlines scope clauses the ACA pilots were openly hostile towards UAL pilots because they were "keeping them from flying jets". I never understood that crap and never will because I wanted to work for a major airline and fly wide body aircraft to Europe and have a decent income not a contract express whos' mainline management may not extend the contract. I spent some years in real industry and also in the military and I have never seen such an over blown sense of entitlement as I do in some airline pilots.
 
Kugelblitz,

well written, well thought, been discussed and fought here to the bitter end, but unfortunately nothing new. I'd recommend getting Gann's "Fate Is The Hunter", on page 156 he writes:

“There is also more than a hint of professional snobbery among the men of every line, each convinced that the methods, techniques, and demands of the other airlines must be somewhat inferior to his own.”
Gann referred to it back in the 1930s or 40s I think. Little has changed today, now it's mainline vs. regional, but still the same sort of "professional snobbery".

We are a sad bunch.
 
Kugelblitz,

well written, well thought, been discussed and fought here to the bitter end, but unfortunately nothing new. I'd recommend getting Gann's "Fate Is The Hunter", on page 156 he writes:

Gann referred to it back in the 1930s or 40s I think. Little has changed today, now it's mainline vs. regional, but still the same sort of "professional snobbery".

We are a sad bunch.

No kidding. Hopefully if his son makes it to the majors, he won't talk the same smack about the minor leaguers somehow trying to take his job. Truly pathetic and ignorant.
 
No kidding. Hopefully if his son makes it to the majors, he won't talk the same smack about the minor leaguers somehow trying to take his job. Truly pathetic and ignorant.

You didn't read the first post on this thread..did you
 
any regional pilot who thinks that mainline jobs should be outsourced to the regional airlines deserves to spend their entire career flying for crappy work rules and worse pay. When are these idiots going to figure out that bringing the flying back to mainline WHERE IT BELONGS benefits them in the long run?!
 
I do have a life and don't refer to this website everyday, and I couldn't tell you the last time I picked up a magazine about flying.

you are so cool - you are much better than the rest of us.

-on my hands and knees looking up

"God, are you there? Do you here me? Why O why can't you let me have a life just like Kugelblitz's?"
 
Last edited:
you are so cool - you are much better than the rest of us.

-on my hands and knees looking up

"God, are you there? Do you here me? Why O why can't you let me have a life just like Kugelblitz's?"

If that is what you got out of my post, then surely I missed the mark. I don't know how to respond to you. Good luck in your endeavors.
 
I look forward when the term scope is gone. It is outsourcing. Outsourcing jobs to cheaper contract carriers.

if airline managers could send your job to be piloted out of China, they would.
 
you are so cool - you are much better than the rest of us.

-on my hands and knees looking up

"God, are you there? Do you here me? Why O why can't you let me have a life just like Kugelblitz's?"


Wow. Are you really that happy doing other pilots flying, with their aircraft, at substandard rates?
 
He who holds the gold, rules.

He who pays the piper, calls the tune.

This is managements fault. Not the struggling Triple-A guy. He's not more than a pawn. His range of choices are dictated by those who own the means to capital. This is not a free will situation. If he's talented enough, knows the right people, has an "in," prepares prepares prepares, whatever; then this AAA/RJ lifer may be able to move up to a Major. However, like musical chairs, there's only so many seats to be occupied... even for the best of dancers. Even in good times. Its a fact of life that some will never move out of a Regional or advance to the major leagues. Whether it be due to comfort (QOL, COL, etc.) or inability (skill, personality), many choose to stay. Its a random gamble and nothing else. Aside from management, external factors (9/11, recession) overwhelmingly affect and negate any personal drive or motivation one has for advancing to a regional.

Not to be overly harsh, but as my right wing conservative friends love to point out, not everyone will make it to the promised land. That is the risk inherent in capitalistic economies. We often, amongst ourselves, point out how flight attendants should not make a career out of a job that was certainly not intended to be such. Perhaps, we should look at the regional/commuter pilot position in the same way.

I know that seems a bit easy for someone on the major side of the equation to say, but I can assure you that I would not still be at Comair where I resided after my AA furlough putting up with the substandard conditions and work rules that pilots at that level in the industry deal with. One of the reasons such onerous conditions exist there is because of the prevailing transitory nature of commuter/regional airlines. Because there is normally such a large turnover in the pilot ranks quickly, it is very difficult for the unions at that level to obtain any sort of real progress, other than modest salary raises, because most of the pilots are not committed to the company for any serious length of time. The minority that chooses to reside at the commuter are then forever vexed at the attitudes of the 'younger dudes' who don't care and only want their PIC time planning to move on as ASAP.

Your references to those who will never make it is the weeding out process that other professions have that I referred to in the initial post. I am not a pilots son, nor an intern, none of that. I am from middle MO which is about as far away from commercial aviation as one can get and I was raised by my grandparents who were employed at a lead smelter. I knew no one, made the contacts on my own, and got awfully damn lucky. Sadly, that is how this system works. Imperfect, you betchya, but that is how all professions operate to my knowledge. Those who are unable to make the right moves and get a bit of a helping hand at the right time get left behind. I sure as hell don't like it, but it is the world we have been bequeathed.

We cannot be expected to uphold what may be in some perspectives seen as an artificial position, that of senior regional/commuter pilot, by continuing to hack away at the ranks of the major pilots. That hacking is exacted by flying aircraft that are increasingly mainline in character, on mainline routes, between major cities. I don't know how else to state the situation as it seems to many of us on this side of the fence. There is likely a sea change approaching in this industry, based on the stated intent of the UAL and DAL MEC's, and no amount of polite diction will change that fact. Forestalling one's movement upward will only exacerbate the difficulty in making the necessary correction to make this profession as great as it once was and inspired all of us to be a part of it in the first place.

I may add that none of this is intended to incriminate the regional/commuter pilot nor propose that those pilots are the problem. This is a problem we all have a share in the blame for, and the fix will be very painful for those who will not adapt to the changing climate as it occurs. I would,of course, propose that all ALPA regional/commuter pilots for any branded carrier adversely affected by contractions in the regional ranks get preferential hiring with the major affiliate. This will not appease any cherished seniority issues, but we all have to start at the bottom.
 
Last edited:
What's a gold select baseball player

A nomenclature designed to give my son an inflated ego and his dad unrealistic expectations about his future in baseball.
 
Did the Regional guys ask what was going to happen to the mainline guys when the flying was taken from the majors? No, they were happy to do the job. Why are the Major worried what the regional guys think now? I am not giving up my CAL scope.
 
Did the Regional guys ask what was going to happen to the mainline guys when the flying was taken from the majors? No, they were happy to do the job. Why are the Major worried what the regional guys think now? I am not giving up my CAL scope.

Right on!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top