Oh-ryan
Occasional User
- Joined
- May 13, 2004
- Posts
- 534
Since when do we always follow what Europe does? Yeah, we have their metric system for Airman Weather, but that might be it. England makes their over age 60 guys go to the right seat for two years. They will be flying over here at Virgin or BA, so should we follow that too? Which one should we do?Just because Turkish Air has a pilot shortage and allows their guys to fly their A340s over here, doesn't mean we have to. So, should we just allow INTL pilots the opportunity? Southwest will likely never fly INTL flights. Should they be restricted because they don't fly INTL flights and the Turk pilots can fly over here at 64 years old? The reason, again, is a shortage of pilots. Should we change our rules that have been around for decades (and everyone has known about them going into this job) because Turkish Air is short on pilots? You make the call. ICAO also states that women could potentially fly 3-4 more years than guys, health wise. Should women be allowed to fly until 68 or 69 and men allowed to fly until 65? That's what they say.....You seem to agree, and if Turkey allows old Grandma's the ability to fly over here nonstop from Istanbul, then we should allow our grandma's to fly domestically at Southwest......You would think that is fair, right? Capt Granny loves you now.
Bye Bye--General Lee
You are all over the map dude and yet you still have no idea where I am coming from. Now hear this... now hear this... I AGREE with you in that we should not do something just because it's what the Europeans do. Hopefully we are clear on this. Secondly, I don't agree with what the Europeans have done with the age 60 rule (again, something that we agree on). And finally, I as long as we allow other 121 carriers to fly in our airspace past age 60 while not letting our own pilots do it is age discrimination. I don't want Gramps up there much more than you, but for the FAA and other groups that want the age 60 rule to stay EXACTLY the same and cite safety as the main reason are hypocrites if they continue to accept foreign 121 carriers to operate in our airspace with your grandmother at the controls. In your example you imply that I am prefectly fine with having an old timer at the controls of a SWA 737 because thats what RyainAir does (or whoever) over in Europe... well I am not. But what difference does it make if we ground those SWA pilots (because of safety) when sitting at the very next gate at BWI is a British Airways jet with a 64 year old captain getting ready to fly over the most densly populated air/ground space in the world. It's not about fairness, its about pointing out the hypocrisy of the pro safey crowd.
Now please continue on with your diatribe of European LCCs/regionals and your playground argument of "If all your friends jumped off a bridge would you do it too?"
Last edited: