Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Questions for G550 drivers?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
You based in EWR? ;)

Yeah, you'll save some gas but you're running the APU at the same time and jacking the operative engine to get moving.

I'd be surprised if you saved $30k/yr. in airline ops by s.e. taxi.

JMO.

TC

TC and all,

I wonder:

1) You jack both engines to get it rolling in some conditions and if you don't them I'd ask how much of a bump do you really need to get it rolling on one. Patience is helpful.

2) Even if you need a big push to get it rolling most of the time spent waiting to depart is spent stationary. If so, then that time creates a big savings opportunity.

3) Most APU equipped a/c have a cross bleed start capability. Depending upon the ability of one pack to maintain cabin comfort and the true need for a second electric source on the ground, I wonder if one even needs the APU while taxiing.

4) ....

caseyd
 
There are a lot of reasons not to taxi a Gulfstream on one engine. It certainly can be done but is not a great idea. This is from me, a former Gulfstream Test Pilot.
 
S/E taxiing in the Gulfstream just never seemed comfortable. Some airplanes are "happy" in that configuration but not the GLF, IMO.

TC
 
Yes, they do. You can build up quite a lot of speed. The TRs are also smoother than the grabby brakes. Popping one TR is usually enough to keep things from getting out of hand.
 
Last edited:
Yes, they do. You can build up quite a lot of speed. The TRs are also smoother than the grabby brakes. Popping one TR is usually enough to keep things from getting out of hand.

I would highly recommend the new brake valve mod, we had ours done in April and it's a night and day improvement
 
I would highly recommend the new brake valve mod, we had ours done in April and it's a night and day improvement

Hope we can talk our management into an upgrade, especially on the "Classic" V. Hadn't flown one for a while until last tour....man those brakes are brutal. The 450 ain't much better. The 550 isn't too bad but I think the IV is the easiest to taxi.

As for the thread starter, SE taxi has been repeatedly evaluated for our operation and rejected every time. And since we operate more than 50 of them, theoretically we would stand to benefit more than most operations. For what that is worth.
 
Last edited:
Dual Brake Metering Valve

Mates,

I strongly suggest you take your Classic GVs and earlier G500/G550s into a service center and incorporate ASC181A for GV or ASC74A for the G500/550. It makes a WORLD of difference .... Makes a GV taxi like a GIV-SP with HMAB ...

Best yet, our MX guy tells me these are "NO CHARGE" ASC's ... now that's UNHEARD OF!

TransMach
 

Latest resources

Back
Top