Pull to guns said....
We are becoming redundant. The pay scales reflect that and the airlines can't wait to get rid of us as a cost center as technology advances.
I am going to politely disagree with Pull to Guns on this one....For more than a few reasons...
1) Our purpose IS being redundant....Sure the Captain is supposed to be able to do everything involved with a flight...But being human he does his job better on some days than others...We are here to catch issues when he has a bad day...The old two brains are better than one deal...
That would be the First Officer Concept.
2) Technology advances and is fun and bright and hopeful...I believe Pull to Guns is a relatively young man working overseas at a prosperous carrier with all the bells and whistles...good for him, I'm envious....I, however, am a bit of a codger and have been around long enough to have a very healthy suspicion and distrust of any technology, no matter how long it has been around...I worked in IT for years and years....it is a tremendously flawed industry that has never and I believe (at least in my and my nephews lifetimes ) does not and will not live up to its hype....
Technology has advanced to the point where computers are entrusted to (and certified) to fly, navigate and land aircraft without any "hands on" actions from humans. I dare say the precision made possible by computers has made aviation safer by removing the human factors such as "having a bad day". This reminds me of the old saying that future flight decks will have one pilot and a dog, the pilot is there to feed the dog and the dog is there to bite the pilot if he tries to touch anything. Pilots are becoming systems monitors as dispatchers are.
3) True, the rest of the world does it differently...They also don't fly as much as we do in the U.S either......also the U.S. as a whole and over a period of time is viewed by some meteorologists as having some of the worst flying weather on Earth....Remember, not day to day, but in the aggregate.....We (dispatchers) are really, really useful on weather days....My young friend, as I understand it....your desert has a fairly constant climate and weather....
What does the quantity of flying have to do with anything? Europe has the most congested airspace in the world. Eurocontrol manages it very well though. Most of these flights have no "Captain on the Ground".
I agree the US consistently has the most severe convective activity in the world. ATC, doppler WX radar and advanced airborne radar make sure very few crews are suprised by unexpected WX. When a DXer is following 15 flights at once, his contribution is many times a day late and a dollar short.
You are correct, my company's hub is in a desert location. Inbound is easy except for the occasional sandstorm. The hard part is that all of our flights go somewhere else. Destinations include Tokyo to Chicago and a lot of places in between. Try winter flights to Moscow and Minsk. On any given shift. I may finish a short hop to Beirut only to begin planning a flight to Sydney. One advantage to DXing in the US is the homogeneous airspace. Everything to one standard. I don't want to get in a pyssing contest with you over who has the most difficult job.
4) Safety...Our reason for being...I will put up our safety record ( U.S.) as being superior to the rest of the world...and I claim dispatchers as the reason for the disparity!!!
You are right, and I am proud of that fact, but FAA oversight, the aformentioned sameness of the airspace, generally good aircraft condition and flightcrew training have a lot to do with that. Dispatchers have a positive effect on flight safety but I would have to disagree that we are the sole reason for disparities of safety records compared to other countries. If this was a proven fact, ALL airlines would have dispatchers
5) Liability...we ( U.S.) are litigious....compared with the devastation of lawsuits, we are pretty darn cheap insurance....saying the computer screwed up won't wash with judges and juries....however, having a living dispatcher gives management someone to throw under the bus at their discretion...they like that!!!
I agree. Our major duties as management sees it is to save fuel(money) and accept blame.
6) Legal requirements....we are (dispatchers) legally required to be here....good luck in changing that regulation!!!
Flight Engineers were once, too.
7) And one final though on automation....just because something CAN be done, we need to REFLECT very carefully whether is SHOULD be done!
Agreed again but don't underestimate the power of economics, especially in the current bad times.
aviator202