Rick1128 said:
In that size and price range, it is pretty tough to beat a Lear 35. Over built airframe, well powered. Not quite as much omph as a 25 but still a goer. Personally, I wouldn't get too worried over the aging aircraft issue with a Lear. I have flown a couple that were over 20,000 hours and they flew quite nicely. Biggest issue with Lears like many jets is corrosion. The dryer the climate it was in before the better.
T/R in a Lear are a non-issue. You are much better off without T/R, if your only choice are the Aeronca's. A waste of useful load as far as I am concerned. The Raisbeck aft locker is useful for about 2 golf bags and not much else. The size is odd enough that there are not too many bags that will fit in it. Plus it increases the side area enough to increase your workload in a good crosswind.
I don't have as much time in 35s as some of the guys on this thread, but I had right around 3000 hours in them when we "moved on". When it comes to Lears (and most other airplanes) newer is usually always better than older. I'd try to find a late model with the 530 autopilot. I wouldn't worry much about corrosion as long as you go with something recently out of a 12 year which was performed by a reputable shop. The main thing is to get a thorough prebuy by someone who really knows Lears. Probably the best "guru" around for Lears is Danny Brown at West Star Aviation in GJT. Danny worked for Duncan for years and is the Lear "go to" guy.
When your talking Lears, you have to remember that there are so many service bulletins and system upgrades that there are probably no two airplanes alike. Again, guys like Danny Brown will keep you out of trouble.
I hear a lot of bad mouthing the Aeronca reversers and I admit that they can be a pain in the keester. However, if they are properly maintained they are very reliable. The biggest problem most mechanics have with them is that they over lubricate them. (Based on the theory that if that much is good, then this much more has got to be better.) We fought t/r problems until we found an experienced Aeronca guy. He showed our mechanic how to adjust and lubricate them and we had zero problems with them after that. Along those same lines, many Lears have drag chutes. Those are a waste of space if you ask me.
Find one that has the cockpit "hair dryers" already installed. They work well to keep the windshield from fogging up. The STC to get them installed isn't cheap, but it will be worth it if you're going to spend much time in the south.
When it comes to baggage, it's certainly one of the Lear's weak points. We put a lot of effort into maximizing what we could carry. The passengers would often bring too much stuff or pieces that were too large. We ended up buying some luggage that we had experimented with and could get to fit easily and completely in the space behind the seat. We then gave it to the owners and told them that whatever they brought on the trip had to fit in those bags. It worked well for us and our baggage issues went away.
A Lear 35 vs a Citation II for the legs your talking about? Definitely a Lear. Besides, I would imagine that you'll occasionally go further. A Citation is a great airplane, but the extra 50 or 60 knots will make a big difference on those longer legs - especially when you're bucking a headwind.
My opinion would change it your budget would allow you to go with a Citation Ultra. That is one nice airplane that is almost as fast as a Lear. When it comes to the Lear 31, I was never too impressed by it. Basically, if you want a Lear 35 to perform like a Lear 31 just fly it at Lear 31 weights.I never could see paying the premium that Lear 31s command.
The 35 is a more demanding airplane to fly than the Citation, but you'll get the hang of it if you decide to go that route.
Have fun.
'Sled