Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Long time since I've flown behind a PT-6 but we always feathered them on shutdown so you would have to start them that way. I've even started one with a mech holding on to the prop. Are you sure you don't mean the Garrett, 'cause starting them in feather or if they slip off the start locks will definately burn one up.I've heard from various sources that it bad to start a PT6 in feather. Wondering why? No one seems to have a good answer. Since it's a free turbine how would doing so affect the compressor section?
Hi all, first post, well second after that screwed up first one.
My PT6 experience comes from working on Piaggio's, so some of the numbers I talk about might not apply to you King Air guys as I've never flown one or worked on one. However, it should all make sense.
When you start a PT6 in feather you put a lot of strain on the starter generator and can run the risk of burning it up, or draining that battery if starting without a GPU. If the engine is started in ground idle, at approximately 47% Ng the GCU will disengage the starter. If you start in feather the chances of actually reaching that 47% are pretty remote, if not impossible.
Secondly, the oil tank is integral to the accessory gearbox. With no oil traveling to the prop hub you create an unnecessary amount of high pressure build up in the accessory gearbox. That in itself, is another reason why it's not a good idea to sit around in feather for long periods of time.
Hope this helps
Thx for the responses.
It seems that starting with props forward then feathering after start while waiting for avionics and clearance might be the way to go provided to wait time isn’t too long.
I’m looking for a way to reduce noise and stress on the parking brake while getting ready to taxi.
Yes King Air.
Good advice. I have an approved realistic checklist but the problem is the ramp is too congested and small to do run-up items and the FMS and EFIS takes at least 5 minutes to start; goofy Chelton system.
Beech's checklist reads more like an instruction manual, takes way too long to accomplish, and it has too many redundant items. Their "Before Landing Check" takes so long that after you put the wheels down and finish reading it you're pulling up to the gate.
I personally don't fly out on the SID/etc via FMS NAV, I use old-school VOR radials until the climb-out, and if everything looks cool, I bring the FMS NAV up. I know Generation-Y doesn't do it that way but it is how I do it. I don't fly with an Ipod either....
Anyway, some ideas for you
When you start a PT6 in feather you put a lot of strain on the starter generator and can run the risk of burning it up, or draining that battery if starting without a GPU.
If the engine is started in ground idle, at approximately 47% Ng the GCU will disengage the starter. If you start in feather the chances of actually reaching that 47% are pretty remote, if not impossible.
Secondly, the oil tank is integral to the accessory gearbox. With no oil traveling to the prop hub you create an unnecessary amount of high pressure build up in the accessory gearbox. That in itself, is another reason why it's not a good idea to sit around in feather for long periods of time.
Why do you not use the FMS for the SID? Not that there's anything wrong with that, I was just curious (always trying to learn something new).
I fly out of some mountainous areas, at many non-home-base-airports, with a variety of King Airs, and have found that the chance to misprogram the box is greater than if I flew the same bird everyday, out of the same airport, everyday.
Flying a departure at night via FMS, in mountainous terrain, can bite you if the SID doesn't load correctly or they give you a new SID as you taxi to the Hold Short line (South America SOP).
At the end of the day, it works for me.
Makes sense to me, thanks.