Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

PSA vs. Mainline

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

InclusiveScope

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 14, 2002
Posts
385
PROBLEM:
How can a pilot, with his/her career interests at mainline US Airways, be expected to act in the best interest of an Express carrier?

Should US Airways pilots be able to vote and hold office at a wholly owned or contract carrier while participating in Jets for Jobs?

SUBJECT:
Voting or holding office at affiliated carriers through Jets for Jobs

(Dual Seniority on affiliated carriers)

SOURCE:
PSA Airlines

BACKGROUND:
Jets for jobs is a new concept with unique problems. US Airways pilots have managed to obtain jobs at Express carriers without communication or negotiation with said carriers.

With the advent of “Jets for Jobs”, the potential exists for mainline pilots to hold union positions where they can make policy changes and advance agendas that would benefit them and mainline with little or no regard to the company or the pilots of the affiliated carriers.

PROPOSED RESOLUTION:
Whereas jets for jobs is a new concept with unique problems, and

Whereas Jets for Jobs has been embraced by ALPA national and signed by ALPA President Captain Duane E. Woerth, and

Whereas the (USAirways) mainline pilots have already negotiated items causing potential harm to affiliate pilots without consulting any affiliated carriers, and

Whereas (USAirways) mainline has shown no intent in stopping their pursuit of negotiating agreements to protect their pilots at the expense of affiliate pilots, and

Whereas this continued negligence could lead to the downfall of ALPA.

Therefore be it resolved that the mainline pilots shall be barred from voting or holding an elected office at a participating affiliate carrier through Jets for Jobs until such a time an equitable solution can be found.

Moved PSA
 
Wow...that's a tough one. I can see both sides. However, If a J4J pilot cannot vote or hold an ALPA office, then that pilot should not have to pay ALPA dues either.
 
There's a long thread to that effect on USAviation.com

According to those guys its a violation of labor law. Any of you lawyer types know the answer?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top