Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

PSA CRJ900 News/More Imaginary Scabs?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

jetfo

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 20, 2004
Posts
316
Some of you guys are something else, and I just had to get off the other PSA thread before I got sick.

What makes you guys offer opinions without checking any facts?

Well, here are some facts for your enjoyment and perhaps enlightenment.

PSA currently pays a blended rate for the CRJ200/700 that is as follows:

5 year capt $68.44/ 10 year capt $78.94/ 15 year capt $89.24

The average pay for CRJ700/900 and EMB170 carriers in the U.S.:

5 year capt $67.50/10 year capt $78.50/15 year capt $90.40

Even if you include US Airways and JetBlue EMB190 100 seat rates in the averages the pay would not change much:

5 year capt $69.83/ 10 year capt $80.42/ 15 year capt $90.66

Here is some more info, Comair with their formerly leading industry contract pays as follows for their CRJ700 rate:

5 year capt $64/ 10 year capt $74/ 15 year capt $87

Let's look at some other popular players, how about the Mesa CRJ900 rate:

5 year capt $67/ 10 year capt $77/ 15 year capt $87

Let's see if we can get those GJet haters stirred up. Here is their CRJ700 rate:

5 year capt $64/ 10 year capt $74/ 15 year capt $84

Looks a lot like the Comair rate doesn't it?!? They must have an industry leading contract!

Let's take a look at our friends at Skywest who fly the CRJ200 and CRJ700 for the same rate and probably shortly the CRJ900s as well:

5 year capt $63/ 10 year capt $74/ $15 year capt $86

Well, if that's not enough let's take a look at what the folks at Republic are flying the EMB170 72 seaters for, that were formerly flown by a MidAtlantic division of US Airways mainline by mainline pilots:

5 year capt $68/ 10 year capt $79/ 15 year capt $92

Not enough yet? Let's look at JetBlue and what they pay their "mainline crews" to fly the 100 seat EMB195s:

5 year capt $77/10 year captain $85/ 15 year captain $89

Maybe we should look at a legacy carrier and what they pay to fly the EMB190s. How about US Airways:

5 year capt $86/ 10 year capt $95/ 15 year capt $95

So what may we conclude? Perhaps that the folks at PSA and the other carriers are all scabs, right?!? But that wouldn't be right, they can't all be scabs or the bottom of the industry.

Yeah let's give the folks at PSA some advice!

First of all, stand up to management like Air Wisconsin did and demand an RJ85 payscale to fly the CRJ900. But, that didn't work since they are not getting any CRJ900s, or any other expansion since they made that move.

Maybe they should stand up to management and the mainline demands like ACA did and lost it's United flying. Or, wasn't it that very thing that lost all of the United flying for Air Wisconsin as well. Thank God that they had the money to buy US Airways flying or they would be gone like FlyI.

And, this strategy worked so well for TransStates, they said no to the CRJ700 rates and TransStates said hello to GJet. Worked well for ExpressJet too didn't it? Lost 69 jets worth of flying with the rest out for bid.

Yeah, lets not talk about the concessions and loss of flying at Comair, the imminent strike at Mesaba and their loss of all RJ85s, 10 CRJ200s and 13 Saabs, and certainly don't mention ASA's loss of CRJ700s and probably CRJ900s to Skywest.

Yeah, lets follow these rocket scientists right on to the maiden voyage of the TITANIC!

When will you people get that you can only get what the market can bear. There will be no industry leading contracts signed with the passenger carriers in the near future, regardless of mainline, legacy, or regional. There is no bargaining power. Look at what happened at US Airways, United, Delta, Northwest, etc.

The best thing we can do is to hold on to as much of what we have and when things return to profitability over a period of time slowly negotiate our way back over a series of contracts.

Should pay, benefits, schedules be better at all levels? Of course they should, but you don't get there by wishful thinking.

If PSA turns down the CRJ900s, I'll bet they'll go to Mesa. And, those guys will not be too proud to fly them, get their upgrade in two years and move on to the majors. In fact, they pay about the same as everyone else.

So, to those folks that think PSA pilots should demand more money to fly them, please share with us specifically what rates do you think they might get in view of what all other carriers are paying?

And, please spare me the garbage about all 70/90 seat flying should be kept at the mainlines. Hello!!! It isn't and you won't change that until and if we get brand scope. Let's talk about reality not fantasy.

And another thing, stop threatening pilot groups with absurd anologies to scabs, race to the bottom, etc. Everyone is taking flying from everyone else, get over it!
 
Have you even been offered 900's??? Where is your proof. Has a RFP come out? I promise you that US Airways would not fund these for PSA when AWAC or Republic and can lease them.
 
jetfo said:
Some of you guys are something else, and I just had to get off the other PSA thread before I got sick.

What makes you guys offer opinions without checking any facts?

Well, here are some facts for your enjoyment and perhaps enlightenment.

PSA currently pays a blended rate for the CRJ200/700 that is as follows:

5 year capt $68.44/ 10 year capt $78.94/ 15 year capt $89.24

The average pay for CRJ700/900 and EMB170 carriers in the U.S.:

5 year capt $67.50/10 year capt $78.50/15 year capt $90.40

Even if you include US Airways and JetBlue EMB190 100 seat rates in the averages the pay would not change much:

5 year capt $69.83/ 10 year capt $80.42/ 15 year capt $90.66

Here is some more info, Comair with their formerly leading industry contract pays as follows for their CRJ700 rate:

5 year capt $64/ 10 year capt $74/ 15 year capt $87

Let's look at some other popular players, how about the Mesa CRJ900 rate:

5 year capt $67/ 10 year capt $77/ 15 year capt $87

Let's see if we can get those GJet haters stirred up. Here is their CRJ700 rate:

5 year capt $64/ 10 year capt $74/ 15 year capt $84

Looks a lot like the Comair rate doesn't it?!? They must have an industry leading contract!

Let's take a look at our friends at Skywest who fly the CRJ200 and CRJ700 for the same rate and probably shortly the CRJ900s as well:

5 year capt $63/ 10 year capt $74/ $15 year capt $86

Well, if that's not enough let's take a look at what the folks at Republic are flying the EMB170 72 seaters for, that were formerly flown by a MidAtlantic division of US Airways mainline by mainline pilots:

5 year capt $68/ 10 year capt $79/ 15 year capt $92

Not enough yet? Let's look at JetBlue and what they pay their "mainline crews" to fly the 100 seat EMB195s:

5 year capt $77/10 year captain $85/ 15 year captain $89

Maybe we should look at a legacy carrier and what they pay to fly the EMB190s. How about US Airways:

5 year capt $86/ 10 year capt $95/ 15 year capt $95

So what may we conclude? Perhaps that the folks at PSA and the other carriers are all scabs, right?!? But that wouldn't be right, they can't all be scabs or the bottom of the industry.

Yeah let's give the folks at PSA some advice!

First of all, stand up to management like Air Wisconsin did and demand an RJ85 payscale to fly the CRJ900. But, that didn't work since they are not getting any CRJ900s, or any other expansion since they made that move.

Maybe they should stand up to management and the mainline demands like ACA did and lost it's United flying. Or, wasn't it that very thing that lost all of the United flying for Air Wisconsin as well. Thank God that they had the money to buy US Airways flying or they would be gone like FlyI.

And, this strategy worked so well for TransStates, they said no to the CRJ700 rates and TransStates said hello to GJet. Worked well for ExpressJet too didn't it? Lost 69 jets worth of flying with the rest out for bid.

Yeah, lets not talk about the concessions and loss of flying at Comair, the imminent strike at Mesaba and their loss of all RJ85s, 10 CRJ200s and 13 Saabs, and certainly don't mention ASA's loss of CRJ700s and probably CRJ900s to Skywest.

Yeah, lets follow these rocket scientists right on to the maiden voyage of the TITANIC!

When will you people get that you can only get what the market can bear. There will be no industry leading contracts signed with the passenger carriers in the near future, regardless of mainline, legacy, or regional. There is no bargaining power. Look at what happened at US Airways, United, Delta, Northwest, etc.

The best thing we can do is to hold on to as much of what we have and when things return to profitability over a period of time slowly negotiate our way back over a series of contracts.

Should pay, benefits, schedules be better at all levels? Of course they should, but you don't get there by wishful thinking.

If PSA turns down the CRJ900s, I'll bet they'll go to Mesa. And, those guys will not be too proud to fly them, get their upgrade in two years and move on to the majors. In fact, they pay about the same as everyone else.

So, to those folks that think PSA pilots should demand more money to fly them, please share with us specifically what rates do you think they might get in view of what all other carriers are paying?

And, please spare me the garbage about all 70/90 seat flying should be kept at the mainlines. Hello!!! It isn't and you won't change that until and if we get brand scope. Let's talk about reality not fantasy.

And another thing, stop threatening pilot groups with absurd anologies to scabs, race to the bottom, etc. Everyone is taking flying from everyone else, get over it!

Very well said....I support you in your statements but Im sure your going to be hated for your facts.
 
jetfo said:
Some of you guys are something else, and I just had to get off the other PSA thread before I got sick.

What makes you guys offer opinions without checking any facts?

Well, here are some facts for your enjoyment and perhaps enlightenment.

PSA currently pays a blended rate for the CRJ200/700 that is as follows:

5 year capt $68.44/ 10 year capt $78.94/ 15 year capt $89.24

The average pay for CRJ700/900 and EMB170 carriers in the U.S.:

5 year capt $67.50/10 year capt $78.50/15 year capt $90.40

Even if you include US Airways and JetBlue EMB190 100 seat rates in the averages the pay would not change much:

5 year capt $69.83/ 10 year capt $80.42/ 15 year capt $90.66

Here is some more info, Comair with their formerly leading industry contract pays as follows for their CRJ700 rate:

5 year capt $64/ 10 year capt $74/ 15 year capt $87

Let's look at some other popular players, how about the Mesa CRJ900 rate:

5 year capt $67/ 10 year capt $77/ 15 year capt $87

Let's see if we can get those GJet haters stirred up. Here is their CRJ700 rate:

5 year capt $64/ 10 year capt $74/ 15 year capt $84

Looks a lot like the Comair rate doesn't it?!? They must have an industry leading contract!

Let's take a look at our friends at Skywest who fly the CRJ200 and CRJ700 for the same rate and probably shortly the CRJ900s as well:

5 year capt $63/ 10 year capt $74/ $15 year capt $86

Well, if that's not enough let's take a look at what the folks at Republic are flying the EMB170 72 seaters for, that were formerly flown by a MidAtlantic division of US Airways mainline by mainline pilots:

5 year capt $68/ 10 year capt $79/ 15 year capt $92

Not enough yet? Let's look at JetBlue and what they pay their "mainline crews" to fly the 100 seat EMB195s:

5 year capt $77/10 year captain $85/ 15 year captain $89

Maybe we should look at a legacy carrier and what they pay to fly the EMB190s. How about US Airways:

5 year capt $86/ 10 year capt $95/ 15 year capt $95

So what may we conclude? Perhaps that the folks at PSA and the other carriers are all scabs, right?!? But that wouldn't be right, they can't all be scabs or the bottom of the industry.

Yeah let's give the folks at PSA some advice!

First of all, stand up to management like Air Wisconsin did and demand an RJ85 payscale to fly the CRJ900. But, that didn't work since they are not getting any CRJ900s, or any other expansion since they made that move.

Maybe they should stand up to management and the mainline demands like ACA did and lost it's United flying. Or, wasn't it that very thing that lost all of the United flying for Air Wisconsin as well. Thank God that they had the money to buy US Airways flying or they would be gone like FlyI.

And, this strategy worked so well for TransStates, they said no to the CRJ700 rates and TransStates said hello to GJet. Worked well for ExpressJet too didn't it? Lost 69 jets worth of flying with the rest out for bid.

Yeah, lets not talk about the concessions and loss of flying at Comair, the imminent strike at Mesaba and their loss of all RJ85s, 10 CRJ200s and 13 Saabs, and certainly don't mention ASA's loss of CRJ700s and probably CRJ900s to Skywest.

Yeah, lets follow these rocket scientists right on to the maiden voyage of the TITANIC!

When will you people get that you can only get what the market can bear. There will be no industry leading contracts signed with the passenger carriers in the near future, regardless of mainline, legacy, or regional. There is no bargaining power. Look at what happened at US Airways, United, Delta, Northwest, etc.

The best thing we can do is to hold on to as much of what we have and when things return to profitability over a period of time slowly negotiate our way back over a series of contracts.

Should pay, benefits, schedules be better at all levels? Of course they should, but you don't get there by wishful thinking.

If PSA turns down the CRJ900s, I'll bet they'll go to Mesa. And, those guys will not be too proud to fly them, get their upgrade in two years and move on to the majors. In fact, they pay about the same as everyone else.

So, to those folks that think PSA pilots should demand more money to fly them, please share with us specifically what rates do you think they might get in view of what all other carriers are paying?

And, please spare me the garbage about all 70/90 seat flying should be kept at the mainlines. Hello!!! It isn't and you won't change that until and if we get brand scope. Let's talk about reality not fantasy.

And another thing, stop threatening pilot groups with absurd anologies to scabs, race to the bottom, etc. Everyone is taking flying from everyone else, get over it!

Nice to see the facts...That's why this should have stayed on the "Local" .... to much outside influence.

We'll see, Good luck.
PSACPSP
 
PSAChiefPilots said:
Want to make a small wager?
PSACPSP
Darn it, I was going to try to make some money on that. There ya go poaching on my action. Ah well, I guess I don't really need that money as apparently I make enough already to go fly a 90 seat jet.
 
My God, I dont believe it! Somebody that actually understands where we are in the BIG PICTURE of life in the airlines. Its about friggin' time somebody got tired enough of all the drivel to actually stand up and say whats actually going on.

There isnt a one of us, or a group of us that can make any changes at this time in space. Doing the best we can at each of our particular airlines and improving our own performance rating is the only way we will be able to stand out from the rest. Crying and barking about the good old days and whats fair and just ain't gonna do it folks.

And for those of you who disagree.......so what I dont care!! Not about you or any other airline than mine. Why? Because that is all I can do anything about. Why am I this way you ask? Maybe its the 2 furloughs and the 2 sh-t jobs I quick because I was lied to and knew nothing of what was promised was going to happen. My new job, yeah I am sure it will suck to but they are paying me well and thats all I care about. Food on my table, not yours! Sorry, thats just the way it is.

Just remember, do the best you can at your job, and go home and enjoy your family's. Crying here on flightinfo only shows just how bitter you are and sad.

If you dont like your job, QUIT!! stop friggin crying.

Captain Happy, formerly Angry Petey

" If you don't ask, the answer is always no!"
 
JohnyChimpo22 said:
Have you even been offered 900's??? Where is your proof. Has a RFP come out? I promise you that US Airways would not fund these for PSA when AWAC or Republic and can lease them.

JohnnyChimpo open mouth, stick foot inside.

Yes they have been offered officially from US management....Not a rumor, or a kiss kiss passing in the hall, but an actual sit down at the table, and here's the deal offer.
 
Want to make a wager that we PDT guys are on the street within 4 yrs?

Nice to see potential growth for ya'll, but damn.......
 
Personally i think that PDT should have the Q400's. Take all the CRJ 200 flying. The Dash saves 50% more fuel. Less weight restricted and is a very nice airplane. Of course it does have props but most of the trailer trash wife beaters couldn't tell the difference anyway. "It's a turbo jet prop..."
 
I think everyone at PDT would agree with you.

Do you really think Tempe would spring for more 900s, then buy Q400s on top of it? I doubt it.
 
jetfo said:
First of all, stand up to management like Air Wisconsin did and demand an RJ85 payscale to fly the CRJ900. But, that didn't work since they are not getting any CRJ900s, or any other expansion since they made that move.


God forbid a pilot group actually stand up and demand to be paid inline with an aircraft's size, passenger load & revenue potential.
I've got a few friends at PSA and I am glad these airplanes could lead to growth, but this is a very difficult decision (maybe not?) for your pilot group.

One thing I keep thinking of, however, is how Doug Parker recently said US Airways has far too many 50 seat regional jets. Given this, I simply don't see why PSA (or any other US Airways express carrier) would get growth 90s and not get rid of 50s in the process.

Food for thought...
 
OPECJet said:
Want to make a wager that we PDT guys are on the street within 4 yrs?

Nice to see potential growth for ya'll, but dang.......








Piedmont should fly these additional 900 flying.
 
BoilerUP said:


God forbid a pilot group actually stand up and demand to be paid inline with an aircraft's size, passenger load & revenue potential.
I've got a few friends at PSA and I am glad these airplanes could lead to growth, but this is a very difficult decision (maybe not?) for your pilot group.

One thing I keep thinking of, however, is how Doug Parker recently said US Airways has far too many 50 seat regional jets. Given this, I simply don't see why PSA (or any other US Airways express carrier) would get growth 90s and not get rid of 50s in the process.

Food for thought...

Actually a good point, one of the transition plans for PSA was to go to an all 700/900 fleet, maybe this is the catalyst.
I don't disagree with you regarding the pay issue, just the reality of the current marketplace.
I believe in an eventual return to brand scope and a national ALPA rate for the number of seats flown, but ALPA has to be the driving force for that.
 
I'm not sure we'd take the 90 seaters. I wouldn't want them anyhow. Give us Q400s and let us go do what we do best. (Also give us our CLT base back).....
 
I say give PDT the-900s and we'll fly them for Dash 8-300 payrates. Let's see........7 YR CA $57.70 per hour.

Beat that PSA.
 
PropPiedmont said:
I say give PDT the-900s and we'll fly them for Dash 8-300 payrates. Let's see........7 YR CA $57.70 per hour.

Beat that PSA.

Now there is a good idea! Introduce a new and totally different aircraft to Piedmont, then start a training program and a maintenance program from scratch, retrain 250-500 pilots. Yeah, that's a good plan!
And, with the super senior pilot group over there, some with 30 plus years seniority, the labor costs would probably be higher even at Dash-8 rates.
 
PropPiedmont said:
JetFO,

Just remember one thing...........No matter how hard you try, you will never be as fuel efficient as we are.

Can't argue with that one ;-)

Especially with those cool new Q400's that I hope you guys are going to get!
 
"Now there is a good idea! Introduce a new and totally different aircraft to Piedmont, then start a training program and a maintenance program from scratch, retrain 250-500 pilots. Yeah, that's a good plan!"

Yeah! Like PSA did in 1995 when they got rid of the entire Jetstream 31 fleet and replaced them with Dornier 328s...

... and like PSA did (again) in 2003 when they got rid of all of those Dornier 328s and replaced them with CRJs.

The 90 seater is a DC9/F28/F100 replacement-jet. It needs to be flown by mainline and by the furloughed pilots whose jobs it has replaced.
 
I agree that your facts are acurate. However, why is there no momentum to follow AWAC's lead. Have we all been brainwashed to just continue substandard wages. A pilot group has finally drawn the line. Alone, they will fail. Yeah maybe you won't get the expansion flying, is that the end of the world? We didn't, and look we are still upgrading. People are moving on to mainline carriers. You may never get to a major. And frankly with the new work rules and wages moving on is not nearly as atractive as it once was. There is no reason if we all follow the high road we will not all gain. For the love of god, there has never been more people flying in this contry. We do not need to fund our company's growth. I'm not trying to tell you what to do. Just don't scoff this decision off as we can't make a difference.

DD
 
PropPiedmont said:
I say give PDT the-900s and we'll fly them for Dash 8-300 payrates. Let's see........7 YR CA $57.70 per hour.

Beat that PSA.

Don't tempt them. :rolleyes:

Is the Air Whisky pilot the group truly the only ones left with balls and a sense of self-respect? This is just sad.
 
jetfo said:


PSA currently pays a blended rate for the CRJ200/700 that is as follows:

5 year capt $68.44/ 10 year capt $78.94/ 15 year capt $89.24

Im confused, according to A.P.C PSAs 5yr 700 CA rate is $66hr and the 200 rate is $62 hr. PSA has about a 2/1 ratio of 200s to 700s right? So how is your blended 200/700 rate HIGHER then you solo 700 rate? -Bean
 
OPECJet said:
Want to make a wager that we PDT guys are on the street within 4 yrs?

Nice to see potential growth for ya'll, but dang.......

I'll take that bet as well, what's the odds? Heck. I'll give you the odds, but you guys aren't going anywhere...catch me in the Terminal since I'm to scared to fly with JC anymore. Where is he anyway???
PSACPSP
 
BenderGonzales said:
"Now there is a good idea! Introduce a new and totally different aircraft to Piedmont, then start a training program and a maintenance program from scratch, retrain 250-500 pilots. Yeah, that's a good plan!"

Yeah! Like PSA did in 1995 when they got rid of the entire Jetstream 31 fleet and replaced them with Dornier 328s...

... and like PSA did (again) in 2003 when they got rid of all of those Dornier 328s and replaced them with CRJs.

The 90 seater is a DC9/F28/F100 replacement-jet. It needs to be flown by mainline and by the furloughed pilots whose jobs it has replaced.

I get annoyed when an entire post is quoted, but Bender- that was awesome. Thanks!
 
Beantown said:
Im confused, according to A.P.C PSAs 5yr 700 CA rate is $66hr and the 200 rate is $62 hr. PSA has about a 2/1 ratio of 200s to 700s right? So how is your blended 200/700 rate HIGHER then you solo 700 rate? -Bean

APC rates are slightly behind. The rates quoted are the 06 rates effective 1/1/06 on the 200 and 10/1/06 on the 700.
 
Beantown said:
Im confused, according to A.P.C PSAs 5yr 700 CA rate is $66hr and the 200 rate is $62 hr. PSA has about a 2/1 ratio of 200s to 700s right? So how is your blended 200/700 rate HIGHER then you solo 700 rate? -Bean

In fact the 5 year capt rate is actually a little more $68.58 beginning 10/1/06.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom