HowardBorden
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2013
- Posts
- 889
I bolded the relevant portions of that article for you. The reason analysts were calling this a negotiating ploy is because of the SWAPA scope clause which is industry leading........perhaps you've heard of it? Section One is pretty unambiguous when it comes to operating another alter ego airline.So the threats by management of a "plan B" and an "alternate plan" had no influence on how the AirTran pilots voted? It didn't change the outcome. Is that what you're saying?
-----------------------------------------
In that scenario -- which at least one analyst suspects is a negotiating ploy -- Southwest would continue to operate subsidiary AirTran as a separate operation.
"I''m sure that's not what management planned when they acquired AirTran," Hunter Keay, an analyst at Wolfe Trahan & Co. in New York, says to Bloomberg. "It probably is to some degree a negotiating tactic."
A. SCOPE
This Agreement covers all revenue and miscellaneous flying, performed with aircraft owned or leased by the Company, or which displays Company markings, including all flying in and for the service of the Company and its affiliates. All flying covered by this Agreement shall be performed by pilots whose names appear on the Southwest Airlines Master Pilot Seniority List
Last edited: