i fly boxes
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2006
- Posts
- 848
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's easy to stick to that that's only 3 out of every 10 guys flow throughs count
I know it's easy to stick to, I just don't think they will.
I think it was put in the contract because ALPA national has the duty of fair representation for the affected pilots.
+1!!
This is EXACTLY why it is in there. Nothing more. Nothing less.
(Even is worded such, paraphrased, "...to offset any job loses caused by this PWA...")
I think it was put in the contract because ALPA national has the duty of fair representation for the affected pilots.
So, how many of those Mesaba flowthroughs are going to change their minds and decide to flow up, now that 15-20 yrs seniority at the new Pinnacle is in jeopardy?
So, how many of those Mesaba flowthroughs are going to change their minds and decide to flow up, now that 15-20 yrs seniority at the new Pinnacle is in jeopardy?
A union is only as strong as its membership, weak Nancys that are too busy to go to chapter meetings and show interest in their careers allow politicians(MEC) to determine their fate. The only failure here is the utter weakness of the membership.ALPA is an utter failure as a labor union.
That topic again? One can easily flip that and say someone in your position is qualified for SWA and FDX while someone like me is not. And for what? If I had been hired at 9E even 1 year earlier, I'd be qualified for those two companies. Anyway, the point being, it goes both ways. You may think it sucks these companies are hiring based on some HR metrics, I think it sucks to eliminate a pilot for not having 1k TPIC, especially considering how this industry has been for the past 5 years.The remaining flowthroughs are all going to go-based on the new circumstances -the Delta pay rates and the fact Pinnacle is a crappy place to work. The ones who have already said no-cannot change their mind. They are stuck or go interview against a 29 year old with a aviation degree and 3500 hours. And we all know who it seems HR really likes now days.
Its called experience. The point is and always have been...get it and move on. With the HR tweeking things there will be a lot of people out there being left high and dry when those with LESS experience not hired. You missed my point and have not heard-even the likes of FedEx is posturing to leave anyone with greater than 7500 hours unhired. I had a spread sheet emailed to me from a FedEx pilot that outlined their "ideal" candidate. Guess what? Too much experience would leave you outside of their hiring program. Fair? I think not. So under that scenario, you might as well apply to FedEx with no PIC and think its fair that you got hired there before the guy with 10,000 hours of PIC. If that happens, I will gladly take your job at Virgin Don't get me wrong, I am happy for you getting hired. When I told you good luck and congrats I meant it. It does not mean I cannot be unhappy that I am still at Pinnacle!
Oh ok, I see what you mean. And I agree 100%. I, too, have heard about a hiring matrix in which people who are above a certain time threshold (like 7 or 8k total) are considered too die-hard in their habits and thought of as untrainable. I think that's BS. Obviously, the same circumstances I described above are also the reason why many CAs haven't been able to move on. For those who are trying but unable so far to get interviews, it isn't their fault they rack up more flight time in that meantime. I agree that these senior pilots should also get their fair shot at a major, regardless of their abundance of flight time.