8
8HRRULE
Flechas said:How curious, all this people that just joined the board this month happen to be pro PFT, DCA, and GIA TOOLS!!
Like I said, were takin over. You, sir, are behind the power curve.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Flechas said:How curious, all this people that just joined the board this month happen to be pro PFT, DCA, and GIA TOOLS!!
8HRRULE said:Like I said, were takin over. You, sir, are behind the power curve.
Flechas said:Yeah, I'd love to see you in the left seat, but just remember , like CatYaaak said "When in danger, when in doubt. Run in circles, scream and shout" you may have to use that a few times, make it part of your flows....
Flechas said:Oh but it is TRAINING, what made you change your name?
8HRRULE said:BANNED 4 LIFE!
Probably because of you toolbag..............................RAT
Some people just can't handle the truth.
Flechas said:Hahahahah awesome, working your way there again?
Flechas said:Just did!!!![]()
Statistically, any airline that grows rapidly, like 9E, will have growing pains. Who is at fault? I would tend to lean toward management and include this, the GIAers with 400 hours are not the PIC. Do they make mistakes? You bet they do. An experienced examiner once told me, be extremely careful of your criticizim because one day you will be criticized for your mistakes too.
The point you were trying to make was that a military pilot is better. I disagree. A military pilot may have certain skills that may differ from a civilians skills because of the extreme differences in aircraft usage, however, with todays training environments and the aircraft available for civilian instruction the differences are quite small. What generally lacks in a 400 hour pilot is situational awareness. Constant situational awareness.
CapnVegetto said:8HRRULE, take note. This is how you DEBATE. Two folks having a nice conversation, civilly disagreeing. All you can seem to do is jump around and go "Ummmmm.....duuuh!!! You worked for Freedom!!! We're taking over!! Duuuuhhh." It's kind of funny, though.![]()
Flechas said:Just did!!!![]()
8HRRULE said:Its not koolaid. And furthermore, superior training CAN substitute for experience. At 1500hrs, a PFT is undoubtably ready to be a captain. The FAA even thinks so. As for the respect factor, repeat that when there is a PFT grad that is your captain.
NOW you're catching on... good for you!CatYaaak said:People say "Wait for the NTSB report". But now it's been asserted that NTSB reports are;
1) ..full of holes due to incompetence, or
2)... the NTSB isn't a dispassionate entity. In fact, the reports it generates are written by people all working in sych to commit federal crimes in the name of $$$. (btw, an investigator purposely omitting relevant evidence so as to change the outcome of an official report is also a federal crime, tantamount to falsification) A Grand Consipiracy. They "can't be trusted to tell the whole truth", you wrote.
So therefore you've basically said;
3)...The reports are bogus anyway! (unless of course the pilots aren't found to be responsible, but merely victims).
Oh I agree completely about 3701, but I'm not going to sling mud over their grave either. I'm going to take the information that comes out, analyze it myself, and try to learn and apply the knowledge to make my aircraft safer without dispariaging the crew's memory. In my opinion, that's what a professional aviator does.Is it because the info they have released so far during their investigation isn't palatable that the bogus-report drum is already beating? The whole POINT of an investigation is to shed light on failings and mistakes in order not to repeat them. That's never tasty. Plenty of reports also praise crews who acted appropriately whether they avoided a disaster or mitigated it. Are those bogus too?
Lear70 said:Oh I agree completely about 3701, but I'm not going to sling mud over their grave either. I'm going to take the information that comes out, analyze it myself, and try to learn and apply the knowledge to make my aircraft safer without dispariaging the crew's memory. In my opinion, that's what a professional aviator does.
Flechas said:I'll buy the second round!!!
CapnVegetto said:True man, you make some very valid points. But, as I said earlier, when the $hit hits the fan, I want someone there that will be able to help me command the situation. There aren't many people out there that can handle an RJ single pilot IFR with a bunch of things going wrong. That's why there are two people up front. A 400 hour guy doesn't have the experience or know-how to handle something like that, or to be much help in that kind of situation, leaving the PIC holding the bag. That's why you're a CREW. When I'm flying my jet around (granted, it's just a slowtation, easily handled single pilot), I want a guy in the right seat that is properly qualified, properly experienced, that can help me when I need it. I just fly a little slowtation now, but I've flown fast, sweptwing airplanes, and that's why they NEED 2 pilots. 2 properly qualified pilots. When something goes wrong, and you have a PIC in the left seat that's trying to handle an emergency, and a panicking 400 hour GIA Koolaid drinker in the right seat also, it might darn well just be too much. That's a situation that can be easily avoided by putting people in the right seat that actually have some experience. And you're totally right, management is to blame for that.
The F/O on that flight was doing his job til the end. He had the airport in sight and they almost made it.
Rook
Looks like a high overcast.
Better ask for Type IV.
Flyer1015 said:Great!
Give it time though, this guy is gonna get himself canned just like last time. I did notice that his 'training' name appeared red-colored in the forums. I didn't know what that was about, but it's obvious now.
Flechas said:I'll buy the second round!!!
8HRRULE said:Third is on me.