Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Pilotless Cockpit?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
You pilotless proponents still haven't addressed the bandwidth and transmission media problems. A level of autonomy could be built in, but an external link will probably always be required. And the only current technology is radio. Ponder that the next time you fly into precip and your ability to communicate drops to zero.

This reminds me of the movie "2001: A Space Odyssey". When the movie was made in 1968, we were orbiting the moon. The pace of the space program was mind-boggling, and Kubrick and Clarke predicted manned flight to Jupiter in 2001. We quickly found out that space flight is vastly more expensive and complex than we thought. I think the same can be said of autonomous passenger jets... the complexity ratchets up enormously and exponentially from a GPS-equipped military drone, and what appears imminent and doable is actually a LONG ways away. This is not "The Jetsons".

Cash drives this industry. It will be cheaper for decades to come to equip your 'bus or boeing with a crew. Huge inertia present in ATC would have to be totally overcome and the system gutted and rebuilt from the ground up, all without disturbing the current schedule.

Yes, the technology is concievable. It is doable. The timeline for it, though, is vastly longer than the proponents think. It is not some pilot-macho wishful thinking, it is economic reality.
 
Superunknown said:
Ironically you just supported the pilot-less aircraft concept.

That crash was found to be pilot error.

Gee... lets think about this one. The crash occured in one of the countries that is involved in Airbus... a government subsidized aircraft maker... and the crash was investigated by that same government.... that being the FRENCH.

Pilot error? I push the throttles to full forward and some computer says F-that, we're landing... Not any kind of airplane I want to fly.
 
Steveair said:
Pilot error? I push the throttles to full forward and some computer says F-that, we're landing... Not any kind of airplane I want to fly.

I will go out on a limb and say that automated airplanes will not be "programed" to "show off". The airplane was stabilized in the landing configuration with gear down and full flaps. below 100 feet it was time to land not do a low pass without putting the machine in go around mode.

Again you make my point. If a pilot would not have been in that aircraft it would have made a beautiful landing on the runway.
 
For the record, it was actually a grass strip. The crew had quite a hard time finding it, from what I've read. The way I understand the accident, the pilot had put the airplane into a position to land and the engines were, in fact, unspooled. If he had pushed the throttles up sooner, he may have had a chance. But we all know how long it takes for a jet engine to go from "Zero to Hero". If you listen closely to the audio on the video clips, you can hear the engines winding up just in time to start chopping wood.
 
Older Thread, Newer Technology

Good article in the Professional Pilot mag this month (Nov 08) about technology advancement in the flightdeck moving the pilot out.

So far we can thank FAR 91.113(b)...vigilance shall be maintained by each person operating an aircraft so as to see and avoid other aircraft.

The FAA is a little concerned about that when it comes to RPVs (remote piloted vehicles) and UAVs.





eP.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom