Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

PCL ALPA sues Pinnacle Airlines

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

DoinTime

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2001
Posts
2,523
Pilots union sues over bonuses at Pinnacle


The union wants to negotiate all compensation for pilots and views bonuses as a unilateral action by management.

By Liz Fedor, Star Tribune
Last update: October 25, 2007 – 8:35 PM

The Air Line Pilots Association sued Pinnacle Airlines on Thursday in U.S. District Court in Minneapolis, charging that the airline is violating federal labor law by paying bonuses to newly hired pilots.
John Prater, president of ALPA International, said that management is obligated to bargain with ALPA representatives on all compensation but that the airline unilaterally made payments to new pilots.

"This is the action of an antiunion management trying to break the union, and we will not stand for it," Prater said in an interview.

The pilots asked the court for an injunction to force the carrier to stop paying bonuses. Pinnacle pilots have been in negotiations on a new contract since July 2004. ALPA contends that the bonuses are an illegal "Band-Aid" approach and the carrier needs a new contract to attract pilots.

"This lawsuit is totally without merit, and Pinnacle Airlines will take appropriate action," airline spokesman Joe Williams said in a written statement. The airline declined to comment further.

Memphis-based Pinnacle operates regional flights for Northwest Airlines out of the carrier's hubs in the Twin Cities, Detroit and Memphis.

Pinnacle has been forced to cancel Northwest regional flights this year because it did not have enough pilot crews to operate its full schedule.

Pinnacle disclosed in May that it expected to pay a $1.1 million penalty to Northwest because of flights it did not fly because of its pilot shortage. In August, Pinnacle said it "recorded a performance penalty to Northwest of $1.3 million." However, it added that it had created "several programs in response to the pilot shortage," and that pilot staffing had returned to a sufficient level. Pinnacle employs about 1,250 pilots.

Despite the objections of Pinnacle ALPA leaders, Pinnacle launched a program paying a new-hire pilot $750 after the pilot completes the last phase of pilot training, the complaint said. In addition, the pilot would earn $500 after six months of service.

The union offered to enter into an "expedited set of negotiations to bring this contract to conclusion this year," Prater said. "Yet they are rejecting the bargaining approach and unilaterally trying to offer these bonuses."

Northwest, in its long-term services agreement with Pinnacle, gave the carrier an incentive to reach a deal with the pilots by March 31 of this year. When no agreement was negotiated, Northwest reassigned 17 regional jets from Pinnacle to Mesaba Airlines, a Northwest subsidiary.

In March, a $340 million Pinnacle deal over five years was discussed in negotiations, former Pinnacle ALPA chairman Wakefield Gordon said. In an early April interview, Gordon said, "We were $20 million apart at the end, and they couldn't come up with any more money to close the deal."

Liz Fedor • 612-673-7709

Liz Fedor • [email protected]
 
First off, give 'em hell Pinnacle guys! Pinnacle management needs to pay for what they do... its time for them to be on the receiving end.

But, secondly, if you're a member of the general public... theres no way you're going to read this article and be on the side of the pilots. It seems like something only that would happen in a unionized workforce... it reads as the company trying to pay its employees bonuses and the union suing to stop it. Only people involved understand whats really going on here I guess...
 
Just when you think you have seen it all! Hopefully this will put enough pressure on managment to lead to a successful conclusion!
 
I wish that were the case but the fight is just getting warmed up, and it is going to get ugly real ugly, My advice to any one considering PCL is look else where, for those that have other options and are here, I would start dusting off the resume if you cannot stomach the fight. The company will probably step up their walking all over the contract, and throught out the whole thing these mother F&%^rs, have the audacity to say we are bargaining in bad faith. Same play book over and over again.....
 
I dont get it. Treat your people like crap and folks will go elsewhere and you have a shortage. What are these millions of dollars a year ceo types thinking? wtf?
 
This needs to be a HUGE warning flag for new pilots to go elsewhere. Take a look at how you will be treated in the future and how bad your QOL will be.

PCL management needs to actually step up to the table and take care of their people. So far they have refused to.

Do not apply at PCL.
 
flyf15 is right on the money!! This is simply amazing. If this doesn't show how out of touch with reality unions are, I don't know what will. I would think that they would be happy that the new hires are getting a little extra money. Many businesses use signing bonuses. It's nothing new. The real issue here is that most of the current ALPA members didn't get bonuses when they signed on and are upset that somebody else got something they didn't. That's the union way!!
 
flyf15 is right on the money!! This is simply amazing. If this doesn't show how out of touch with reality unions are, I don't know what will. I would think that they would be happy that the new hires are getting a little extra money. Many businesses use signing bonuses. It's nothing new. The real issue here is that most of the current ALPA members didn't get bonuses when they signed on and are upset that somebody else got something they didn't. That's the union way!!

What this has to do with, to put it nice and simple for you, is that bonuses depress the actual wage paid to pilots. Especially during a time when the contract is amendable.

If you want to pay pilots more for higher recruitment, sign the deal. Don't be all sneaky and pay newbies under the table while the pilots are still flying on wages established in 1999.

This is not about the union trying to block new FOs from receiving bonuses (by the way, the company reneged on them), but it's about getting the company to stop stalling and give the pilot group what they deserve.
 
flyf15 is right on the money!! This is simply amazing. If this doesn't show how out of touch with reality unions are, I don't know what will. I would think that they would be happy that the new hires are getting a little extra money. Many businesses use signing bonuses. It's nothing new. The real issue here is that most of the current ALPA members didn't get bonuses when they signed on and are upset that somebody else got something they didn't. That's the union way!!

WRONG!

While i agree the general public has no clue and will make a similar conclusion.

The fact is they are circumventing a thing called a CBA, otherwise known as a contract. The company is required by law to abide by the RLA, just like the union is, and during section 6 negotiations status quo must be maintained. Offering a bonus is not status quo when you offer it to some pilots and not others.

But, I'm sure your head is still stuck in the sand when you hear reason.

Medeco
 

Latest resources

Back
Top