Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
COOPERVANE said:My latest $500 ALPA mag said that in 1978 Northwest pilots struck when the pilots walked to protest management's "bad faith negotiating" What the FUKK DO YOU CALL THE LAST 4 YEARS AT ASA? ALPA has NO balls anymore.
The dumbest thing I have ever heard is that we will not have ANY more scheduled meetings with the mediator until the company moves significantly.
We can not be released to self help until the arbitrator meets again and determines that we should be released (from what I understand)
Soooo it seems the company can just drag this out for 4 MORE years if they want to. Am I wrong?
COOPERVANE said:Yes I DO remember that management can resume negotiations at any time and that the ball is in their court, that is my point. WHY SHOULD THEY?
If SkW inc. is calling the shots, I don't see why they would want to settle this EVER. Maybe all part of the plan to let us die on the vine. It makes me nervous that SKW is training 500 pilots this year.
We just sit in committee, read minutes, vote no confidence, draft a resolution condemning race to the bottom negotiating, blah, blah, blah. ALPA has lost its action-taking ability. This looks like "bad-faith bargaining to me!! Anyone else???
WWEfan said:I heard there are plans to picket SKYW headquarters in St. George soon.
atlcrjdriver said:From ASAContract.com
Q) There are rumors circulating about pilot negotiations and I don’t know who’s telling the truth. Did the company make an offer in a private meeting with the union recently and then rescind it the next day?
A) There have been a number of questions and comments similar to this and, yes, the rumor mill seems to be working overtime. I’ll try to address this as best I can, given the delicate line I must walk because the meetings were supposed to be confidential. But, let me start by saying the company never rescinded anything that we had discussed.
…Thus, during a meeting on other issues between company representatives and some of the ASA ALPA MEC senior leaders, we explored whether frank, off-the-record meetings (not part of the formal negotiations process) might lead to an agreement and we discussed in general the framework of what a different deal might look like.
We received what I thought was a favorable response and were encouraged to continue the off-the-record discussions and provide more specifics with a larger group of ASA ALPA representatives. In a second meeting recently we did just that, laying out details of the kind of deal we thought would meet the needs of the company and our pilots.
The response from ALPA was not consistent with what we had received during the previous meeting. We simply were told the items discussed did not meet ALPA’s expectations and we were given no indication that further discussions at that time would prove fruitful. We have tried to maintain the confidentiality of the meetings and the specifics of what was discussed, but the recent rumor mill mischaracterizations of the meetings and the outright distortions of some aspects make that very difficult.
I want to be very clear on one thing -- this is very important because of the inaccurate information being shared in the rumor mill -- and that is that we never rescinded our offer. We were fully prepared – and still would be – to stand by the kind of agreement we discussed.
Somebody is not telling the on this deal and ALPA isn't looking that great right now. It's tx to stop playing the games and get this done.
HoserASA said:Very true. Management's "contract" website is purely propaganda. If management is serious, call the mediator and make the offer there.
Hoser
rightseatjocky said:LoL melit, You're so right. It sure gets old. I am a 4 year fo at ASA and I love it here. They want to shut the airline down, well some of us like it here. It is mostly the Atlanta crews that can't stand it. They had the chance to come to Salt Lake and love the flying too.
ASADriver said:I think the company is telling the truth here. Remember the negotiating committee members were saying that the offer was turned down because of preferential bidding. It wasn't until people started question ALPA that they came up with the story that management pulled the offer off the table. Sounds like ALPA isn't telling the whole truth.
ASADriver said:I think the company is telling the truth here. Remember the negotiating committee members were saying that the offer was turned down because of preferential bidding. It wasn't until people started question ALPA that they came up with the story that management pulled the offer off the table. Sounds like ALPA isn't telling the whole truth.
ASADriver said:I think the company is telling the truth here. Remember the negotiating committee members were saying that the offer was turned down because of preferential bidding. It wasn't until people started question ALPA that they came up with the story that management pulled the offer off the table. Sounds like ALPA isn't telling the whole truth.
COOPERVANE said:How am I wrong? Not trying to be a smarta$$ Just looking for info