Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Part Time Pilots, Yay or Nay?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
That would be my ideal situation...I know a lot of other crewmembers who would probably prefer it that way too.

I'd LOVE to do 1 or 2 4 day trips a month, buy my health insurance and travel privileges and limit my exposure to the chaos and stupidity.
 
This is (or at least was, don't know if it's still on the table) being discussed by ALPA and XJT mgmt. Just like FAs, the company isn't forcing anyone to go PT, its entirely voluntary. If someone can afford it and wants to be home for their kids baseball or soccer season, why force them to work a 90 hour line? PBS allows us to bid to work only whatever the company minimum is for the month, with PT guys/girls can work less if they so choose. Of course the company would never go along with it if they had to fork out the money for benefits or guarantee, so that all needs to be worked out before an agreement is submitted. Then, our elected leaders at ALPA need to agree before it is LOA'd or incorporated into our next contract.

As for the reserve guys, this could be a good thing for you too. If guys choose to go PT, that means less trips awarded to current lineholders. Maybe with these extra trips, PBS will build you a line and get you off reserve.

How is having more options for QOL to pilots a bad thing? FA's love being able to go PT if they want and are senior enough to hold it. I'm sure it'd go senior for pilots too, with senior guys who make plenty to live off of flying 2 trips a month.
 
What if during lean times the company did not have enough part time pilots? Could they junior man into part time status? Could new hires only be offered part time until a full time position opens? This opens up a whole can of worms that an airline without the protection of a CBA should not consider.
 
So you still have to work 10 days a month for half pay and no bennies? No thanks, I'll work 11-12 days and keep everything.
 
So you still have to work 10 days a month for half pay and no bennies? No thanks, I'll work 11-12 days and keep everything.

No doubt. Anybody who is forfeiting funding their 401K better be really sure that sugar train their riding on has solid tracks. As for buying your own health insurance, have fun with that one!
 
I notice several of you mentioned guys several times in your posts. It's not really guys with sugar mommas (rare) who will benefits from this, but rather girls with a hubby who makes more money and has better benefits. Especially if she has kids or wants to. I think part time would be fab, and all my flight attendant friends who bid it love it. I've never heard anyone being forced into it and it usually goes pretty senior.
 
But I'm opposed without some insanely airtight limitations on what the company can do with it.
Even airtight limitations open the door to the concept. Right now part-time work is not considered appropriate in the piloting profession. But if one or more significant airlines start up the practice, then it opens the door in ALL airline negotiations for management to push for the practice, as it becomes more and more industry-standard. Before you know it you're giving up pay raises in order to fight off mandatory part-time positions, which become more and more numerous. Eventually everyone is working part-time and we're working for Wal-Mart Airlines.
 
Part-time could be very nice, but I need the health insurance and 401k, plus the ability to return to full-time. Perhaps offer a health plan w/o maternity/contraception bennies for those of us without that need.
 
Perhaps offer a health plan w/o maternity/contraception bennies for those of us without that need.

Seriously? Talk about a bad precedent! I think most of us have a need for one or both of those! Or at least the first if you don't have the second covered! ;)
 
Even airtight limitations open the door to the concept. Right now part-time work is not considered appropriate in the piloting profession. But if one or more significant airlines start up the practice, then it opens the door in ALL airline negotiations for management to push for the practice, as it becomes more and more industry-standard. Before you know it you're giving up pay raises in order to fight off mandatory part-time positions, which become more and more numerous. Eventually everyone is working part-time and we're working for Wal-Mart Airlines.


I'm with you, better safe than sorry.
 
Part-time could be very nice, but I need the health insurance and 401k, plus the ability to return to full-time.

I don't think you get it...once we allow part-time to be an acceptable pilot category, then management will have sole discretion as to how many positions are available in each category (just like they now tell you how many positions are available for each aircraft at your company). Before you know it, the majority of pilot positions will be part-time.

This is all about setting PRECEDENT. Just look at every other industry in the country to see how part-time work is being abused. It's coming to the pilot industry, if you let it.
 
CC wants to find a way to manage the swings in pilot numbers - being overstaffed at certain times and under staffed at others. He has asked about the idea and it is being looked at. Part time pilots and/or VLAs in 1, 2 and 3 month blocks. He thinks this would be preferable to furloughs. FWIW
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom