gutshotdraw
ZERT Wilson CQB User
- Joined
- May 6, 2005
- Posts
- 3,226
Hmmmmmmmm.
http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/fifth-circuit-rules-for-exxonmobil-endi-17295/
Ironically, the same people in my shop who pound the table the hardest for "one level of safety" when demanding we adhere to Part 121 rest rules (ie: 117), will also be the loudest ones decrying this decision as "age discrimination."
Pick one set of rules folks. You can't have it both ways.
As an aside, I still have a 15 year old new hire manual that says "the mandatory retirement age for Executive Jet shall be 65..."
http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/fifth-circuit-rules-for-exxonmobil-endi-17295/
Ironically, the same people in my shop who pound the table the hardest for "one level of safety" when demanding we adhere to Part 121 rest rules (ie: 117), will also be the loudest ones decrying this decision as "age discrimination."
Pick one set of rules folks. You can't have it both ways.
As an aside, I still have a 15 year old new hire manual that says "the mandatory retirement age for Executive Jet shall be 65..."