Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Pagan, Wiccan, Druid worship area at USAFA

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Shag and PBR,
This has been an interesting interchange between you two and I have enjoyed reading your responses. I am sure you both could out debate me...but that being said, I have to add one comment.

What the Atheist seems to leave out is that he is living under the laws that "religion" has established. That is apparent in any society under any theological/deistic leanings. For example, Why is it wrong to kill? Well in our "Christian" society, we say that it is wrong to kill because that is what God commanded (i.e. in the ten commandments).

When it comes to science, there is no morality. Science is just facts/theories. So when you base your entire existence on science, you have to conclude that there is no morality. If there is no morality, there is no right and wrong.

If someone wants something that you have, it should be ok for them to attempt to take it. The only means you have to stop them is "survival of the fittest". If they come into your home and you get to your .45 before they do, you are the fittest. That being said, the person entering your home is not wrong they were weaker in this instance.

Another example...Is it wrong for your spouse to be unfaithful to you? If she had an urge, why can she not fulfill that urge? At what point is she "unfaithful" or wrong?

I know that these two quick responses are not too complicated, but you have to realize that morality comes from religion not science.
 
Last edited:
Well in our "Christian" society, we say that it is wrong to kill because that is what God commanded (i.e. in the ten commandments).

Funny, I have lived in non-Christian countries were murder was illegal too. And I can think of lots of laws that we have, that were not passed down from religious decree. Its not in the Bible that anyone under 16 can not drive.

Morality does not require religion, it requires a thinking person who can discern between right and wrong, who can think of something besides just ones self.
 
I heard this discussion on the radio the other day and it might be interesting listening for all. It is an exchange between Dr. Barry Creamer and David Smalley. David Smalley is the editor of the American Atheist Magazine and Dr. Creamer is a professor at Criswell College.


http://criswell.barrycreamer.com/category/broadcasts/

You might have to go back through the archives to hear all parts.
 
Not all law is "religion" based. I am talking about morality. What is your guide? You cannot just discern or think about what is right and wrong...you have to have an absolute to start with. So what is your "Guide"? With no absolute truth, you cannot tell me what is right or wrong. So, why is it wrong to rape? Just because you think it is not ok? What if someone else has thought about it and decided it was best for them to pursue this act? What dictates can you point to that it is wrong?

Read the whole post. I said that even in non-Christian countries, they have their laws based on their religious beliefs.
 
Last edited:
Hi!

It is wrong to compare Science and Religion in the area of morality. Science is about studying how our universe works, and how we can improve our lives with technology. Ultimately, if our earth survives long enough, Science will prove that God exists, and that God created the universe.

I do not want any laws or legal code that is based on religion, because if I don't agree with the religion, I won't agree with the laws (like Sharia, based on the Muslim religion).

I want a legal code that is based on what my society decides will work best for itself.

Situation: Is it ok to kill someone to take something from them?
Answer: No. That negatively affects the society. It is undesireable, so it is illegal.
No religion involved.

cliff
NBO
 
persucutions on crosses, resurections, poor man saviors, trinities, dieing for sins, etc etc....all happened well before Jesus Christ. Christianity is just another summation of other beliefs. Hell (no pun intended) had Constantine not declared Christianity the official religion of the Roman empire, Chrisianity would have died along with the other lunatic fringe religions.
 
Just like gravity is "just a theory", or germ theory, or the theory of relativity. FYI, the term "theory" in science doesn't refer to a hypothesis like it does to a laymen. A "scientific theory" can be disproved, but hasn't been and continues to answer questions and is able to predict. If I drop an apple, I know the theory of gravity tells me it will fall, and does every time. If I look in a strata of rocks that date to the Jurassic period, I should find dinosaurs and their contemporaries, and guess what, I do, every time. You would think if evolution were not a fact they would find just one bunny rabbit in the Cambrian strata. They haven't because bunny rabbits didn't exist back then, just the bunny's common ancestor.

My experience with believers is they are in intellectually dishonest. You prove a point, and they say, well what about this, and what about that. So keep the debate narrow and I'd be happy to show you the science behind it. Beware, though, if you're getting your talking points from a christian website, I've seen just about all of the silly arguments and EVERY single one have been debunked with real science.

Oh, and science is not a religion. Religion is the belief in the supernatural. Something beyond the natural. I don't believe there is anything beyond the natural world, because I've seen no evidence for it. Therefore, by definition, I do not have faith in any "religion". I don't come in with some presupposed answer and try to make the evidence fit. I start with the evidence and see where it leads. There is a HUGE difference. But of course, you guys know the truth. Now, please dazzle me with how the evidence fits your truth.

Not sure if this has been mentioned as I dont want to read all 9 pages of this thread, but you are not quite correct in your "gravity is just a theory" mindset. Perhaps your 15 year old wunderkind can set you straight, and as a $200/hr Captain I would've assumed you'd have known this, but gravity is not a "theory" but rather one of Sir Isaac Newton's laws.

Just an FYI, Shag.
 
persucutions on crosses, resurections, poor man saviors, trinities, dieing for sins, etc etc....all happened well before Jesus Christ. Christianity is just another summation of other beliefs. Hell (no pun intended) had Constantine not declared Christianity the official religion of the Roman empire, Chrisianity would have died along with the other lunatic fringe religions.

The only thing fringe here is your fringe opinions about history. I see you are back again posting the same misinformation. I will remind you...again, Judaism predates the religions you cited last time, and Christianity predates both Islam and Hinduism. Second point Constantine did not declare Christianity as the official religion of the Roman Empire. I am not even sure what Roman Empire you are speaking of since there were two during much of Constantine's reign as Emperor. I find no evidence he declared Christianity the official religion of the Eastern or Western Empire. Try again to make a relevant point based perhaps in some historical fact or evidence.
 
Last edited:
We have a winner!!:smash:

How about you? You want to give it a shot and show me where Constantine made Christianity the "official religion of the Roman Empire" or even just the Eastern Empire. Its good to see the blind can still lead the blind.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top