Shag and PBR,
This has been an interesting interchange between you two and I have enjoyed reading your responses. I am sure you both could out debate me...but that being said, I have to add one comment.
What the Atheist seems to leave out is that he is living under the laws that "religion" has established. That is apparent in any society under any theological/deistic leanings. For example, Why is it wrong to kill? Well in our "Christian" society, we say that it is wrong to kill because that is what God commanded (i.e. in the ten commandments).
When it comes to science, there is no morality. Science is just facts/theories. So when you base your entire existence on science, you have to conclude that there is no morality. If there is no morality, there is no right and wrong.
If someone wants something that you have, it should be ok for them to attempt to take it. The only means you have to stop them is "survival of the fittest". If they come into your home and you get to your .45 before they do, you are the fittest. That being said, the person entering your home is not wrong they were weaker in this instance.
Another example...Is it wrong for your spouse to be unfaithful to you? If she had an urge, why can she not fulfill that urge? At what point is she "unfaithful" or wrong?
I know that these two quick responses are not too complicated, but you have to realize that morality comes from religion not science.
This has been an interesting interchange between you two and I have enjoyed reading your responses. I am sure you both could out debate me...but that being said, I have to add one comment.
What the Atheist seems to leave out is that he is living under the laws that "religion" has established. That is apparent in any society under any theological/deistic leanings. For example, Why is it wrong to kill? Well in our "Christian" society, we say that it is wrong to kill because that is what God commanded (i.e. in the ten commandments).
When it comes to science, there is no morality. Science is just facts/theories. So when you base your entire existence on science, you have to conclude that there is no morality. If there is no morality, there is no right and wrong.
If someone wants something that you have, it should be ok for them to attempt to take it. The only means you have to stop them is "survival of the fittest". If they come into your home and you get to your .45 before they do, you are the fittest. That being said, the person entering your home is not wrong they were weaker in this instance.
Another example...Is it wrong for your spouse to be unfaithful to you? If she had an urge, why can she not fulfill that urge? At what point is she "unfaithful" or wrong?
I know that these two quick responses are not too complicated, but you have to realize that morality comes from religion not science.
Last edited: