Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

"Other approaches"

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Lead Sled said:
Mini,
Here's a homework assignment for you...

Get out the C-172RG's POH, go to the suppliment section and read up on it then return and report.

:) 'Sled

uh...wrong thread? :D
 
Its all good man...

Yeah, I checked the "Glide Slope", and it shows a picture of a LOC/GS with "ARC" on it, but...uh...I'll be d@mned if it says what it does..

Airplane flying handbook perhaps? Instrument handbook?

Anyway...I'll let ya know if I see anything :D

Sorry bout the "mini-threadjack"...back to your regularly scheduled programming...

FBO or MESA (IMO)

-mini
 
MTPilot, you said the examiner isn't allowed to 'make up' an approach but what about using a published NDB approach from another airport? One from a high-ish elevation so the MDA is at or above the 25mi MSA for your local airport?

That provides safe terrain separation for the operation. The catch would be that any circling requirement will still have to use a local approach but any requirement to demonstrate a missed approach can be met if the chosen, non-local NDB approach only relies on the navaid for the missed.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top