Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Operating Successfully during a Strike

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
DoinTime said:
Scabbing is performing struck work. Plain and simple.

Scabbing has always been the act of crossing the picket line and becoming a replacement worker at the company being struck.

Sorry, but you just can't broaden up the definition to the extent you are attempting, it just don't work. However, I understand your desire and agree, but it ain't gonna fly bro.

Cal
 
Donsa320 said:
Unless you are in the same union you cannot honor the other's picket line if you have a contract to work. That is a secondary boycott, forbidden by Taft Hartley. The company would get an injunction against it in a heart beat. When Lorenzo did not do that, in the case of Eastern, then you knew he did not want the pilots back. In any case, nobody won that one anyway, IMHO.

~DC

Small technicality -- Taft Hartley does not apply. The NWA situation is under the RLA (Railway Labor Act). In certain circumstances a sympathy strike is permissable, in others not. The law is not cut and dry but very complex.

The EAL pilot strike was a sympathy strike in support of the IAM.

In the APA case, wich was not a strike, the judge's ruling was a somewhat draconian decision written by a man whose own words made it patently clear that his personal attitude towards labor unions and labor disputes was the purpose of the decision. If you read the decision it is not hard to see that. Nevertheless, it was upheld. Federal judges seldom rule in favor of labor, which has little to do with facts and a lot to do with politics.

In any case, it is hightly improbable that the NWA pilots will honor the mechanics strike. I predict the pilots will fly if the mechanics strike, picket line or not, they will cross it. ALPA will not go to court to try and prove it can strike in sympathy.

The company's objective in this case is to break the AMFA. They will probably succeed.
 
surplus1 said:
Small technicality -- Taft Hartley does not apply. The NWA situation is under the RLA (Railway Labor Act). In certain circumstances a sympathy strike is permissable, in others not. The law is not cut and dry but very complex.

The EAL pilot strike was a sympathy strike in support of the IAM.

In the APA case, wich was not a strike, the judge's ruling was a somewhat draconian decision written by a man whose own words made it patently clear that his personal attitude towards labor unions and labor disputes was the purpose of the decision. If you read the decision it is not hard to see that. Nevertheless, it was upheld. Federal judges seldom rule in favor of labor, which has little to do with facts and a lot to do with politics.

In any case, it is hightly improbable that the NWA pilots will honor the mechanics strike. I predict the pilots will fly if the mechanics strike, picket line or not, they will cross it. ALPA will not go to court to try and prove it can strike in sympathy.

The company's objective in this case is to break the AMFA. They will probably succeed.

Well, back in the day we we were told at ALPA meetings that Taft Hartley did apply as far as the secondary boycott was concerned.
But as you say, Federal Judges seldom rule in favor of labor. If NWA ALPA no longer has a "no strike clause" they must have gotten rid of it after the '98 strike. (I've beeen gone since 1991).

My point really is to cool down the hot heads that seem to think that a strike is a walk in the park. It is not...lives will be ruined and jobs and companies lost for good in many cases. People will scab with little remorse. On the other hand memories are long. Example; The Southern Airways strike in the early 1960's. It was only settled after the Democrats took the White House after the 1962 elections. But scabs were allowed to stay on as part of the back to work agreement. Forward to 1991 just before I retired. One of those scabs mistakenly left his kit bag in ops at Memphis, overnight. A couple of the old Southern guys took the bag to the men's room and emptied the contents of their large bowel into it! 40 years after the strike. But remember, these were true scabs flying Southern's DC-3s on Southern's routes. So if you are flying under a contract for a struck carrier, ALPA will let you know if your flying is considered flying struck work. You don't get to make that determination on your own. Be very careful about walking off the company property. it may be difficult to get back on it.

~DC
 
Last edited:
cfm56-7b said:
why are the pilots the first one's to take concessions?

I think because we have the most to lose. We can't zip over to a different carrier with any ease if our company fails. IMHO

DC
 
Donsa320,

I agree with everything you said in your post # 25. Any strike is a very sad event. The wounds never heal completely.
 
100LL... Again! said:
If NW already has this agreement in place with outside vendors, then that is not crossing a picket line. You would, perhaps, like him to lose his job to protect the NW mechanic's bargaining position?

I don't like the fact that my company will be takeing work from NWA if their mechs walk out. However, it is completly out of my controll. Short of quiting my job (something I won't do, I have a family to support) there is nothing I can do.

Calling all 3,000 mechs at my facility scabs simply because we are continueing to do our jobs is uncalled for, and insulting.




Now the guys who are being brought in to do line maint by NWA are a different matter entirely.
 
How about the managers and salaried employees who are trained to work in place of the mechanics. Are they considered scabs though they are managers? Lets say they used to be a mechanic, now they are a manager. They then work as mechanics again during the strike, then back to a manager after the strike.


The managers do not have the ability to honor the picket line. In order to keep their jobs (and even to qualify for unemployment benefits) they must do as the company asks.

What is the common perception of a worker like that?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top