Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Ooouuch!

  • Thread starter Thread starter lowecur
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 4

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

lowecur

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 14, 2003
Posts
2,317
SWA load factor sinks to 56% this Jan. This is 2 points below last years 58%. Even with the system-wide sale early in the month, it wasn't enough to help. The disturbing thing is most of the legacy carriers load factors increased as they added back capacity.

AAI's load factor was down 1 point. It will be interesting to see how B6 does. If all three of the major LCC's have drops, this shows that the legacy's are beginning to have an affect while adding capacity.

It is shaping up to be an interesting year of competition.
 
More flawed logic.:confused:
 
lowecur said:
SWA load factor sinks to 56% this Jan. This is 2 points below last years 58%.
Is this a significant change? I don't claim to have any better knowledge about this but, it seems to me that only 2% points in any given month is basically level performance.
 
Whitecloud

WhiteCloud said:
Is this a significant change? I don't claim to have any better knowledge about this but, it seems to me that only 2% points in any given month is basically level performance.
I think this is a significant change. It is a sign that the legacy's have gone on the offensive from largely a posture in the past few years of survival. It may seem subtle, but believe me it has the full attention of WN's management. That's why the continuation of the nationwide route sale into February.

WN, B6, and FL see this as the cost of doing business. Their plans are not going to change as it's a long term battle of attrition. It's an attrition battle that the LCC's are fully capable of taking advantage of, along with those legacy's that have a strong business plan in place. The pressure WN's mgt will feel is when the stock price continues to shrink, options no longer will pacify the rank and file. This will be a tough year to keep the expenses from overwelming a predictably weak RASM due to competition.
 
Last edited:
sore looser?

Come on lowercur,

Accept defeat. They are not getting the Emb190 at least for a while. 31st consecutive year of profitability, almost 2Bil in cash and management is ready to flip? January is not a good month and neither is February, get over it. Wait until they get to PHL. Obviously the people at SWA are not seeing the 190 like the magical aircraft you seem to think it is. It's difficult to get an experienced animal make rookie mistakes. Don't look for the order.
 
I can't believe I am going to defend lowcur, but this kind of stuff (to a point) belongs on the interview board because company performance affects growth wich in turn drives hiring.

I am going to react to this news a little differently though. I think lowcur's analysis makes sense on the surface and is the primary reason our stock is so low and probably will get lower. However, I think mgt knew this was coming in some form or another. I agree there are challenges ahead, but I'll bet you a bushel of RJs that our growth continues are planned. In the coming competition what airline is better capitalized? Who is better positioned?
 
C'mon, man, do the research before you go jumping to conclusions.

Seems like you started off with a conclusion, and then tried to find a few "facts" to prop up your faulty conclusion.

AirTran posted record numbers for January. Yes, the load factor was a point lower, but with 16.5% more seats! We actually had almost 10% more passengers over January 2003. Here's the whole story:

Based on RPMs, traffic grew by 14.9 percent, to 570.9 million RPMs, on an increase of 16.5 percent in capacity, based on available seat miles (ASMs). January's load factor reached 62.5 percent, compared to 63.4 percent in January 2003. The airline also enplaned 892,811 passengers in the month of January, a 9.7 percent increase over January 2003, and a record for the month of January.
 
SWERPIPE/IVAUIR

Swerpipe

I must admit that it doesn't look good for ERJ stock. UAIR is requesting that GECAS look for other airlines for the 30 or so 170's and the 25 CRJ 700's. AirCanada is another weak link in the order book. Hopefully the rest of the Star Alliance will strengthen the orderbook in the next few months.

As far as the WN order, well I'm not as confident as I once was. I still believe it makes sense as it allows mgt to reduce payroll costs with a B scale, and keeps the status quo for the 737 payrolls. I know costs to implement the E-series as a 2nd a/c are high, but I still believe it is the viable long term solution. The other choice is the inevitable approach to SWAPA for a payroll reduction at some point in the next 3 years.

Ivauir

I know that wasn't an easy statement to make, but I too am not a fan of sensorship. I am trying to bring some reasonable discussion topics that pertain to the future of the industry.

If the interviews with Mr. Parker are a window into his thoughts, then obviously the E-series is not on the front burner. He didn't rule it out entirely, but obviously they want more financial data over the course of the next few quarters, before they finalize any decisions along those lines. I do however believe the IFE will be picked up long before the E-series from WN. And you're right on the position of WN to capitalize on any opportunity in the next few years.
 
Ty

Ty Webb said:
C'mon, man, do the research before you go jumping to conclusions.
Ty, I'm not trying to belittle FL's accomplishments. All I'm trying to do is show the trend for a possible return to strength of some of the legacy's. Jan is a notoriously slow month for carriers in general, but capacity is up across the board, and some of the legacy's are gaining back market share.
 
Lowecur,

Maybe you could go help Mr. Seagull out over at USAir, Lord knows he needs it.

I think Mr.'s Kelleher and Parker have things under control here at SWA.

$442,000,000+ in 04!
 
I love this board because the discussions are usually civilized.

Lowecur,

Maybe this is a blip. Maybe the economy is slipping back into recession. Interest rates show that the Fed is fearful of that prospect. I do know that yield management strategy greatly affects load factors. Guessing what the yield folks are doing is VERY difficult and is often misunderstood. I wonder what SWA needs for a load factor to turn a profit? ATA had a better load and posted a loss.


Why is this on an interview board? If you haven't switched jobs yet in this industry you are young or VERY fortunate. I know folks who left FedEx in '00 and '01 for other carriers just to be furloughed after 9/11. I read about some dumas that got furloughed from USAir, was hired by SWA and then went back to USAir when recalled. Where is he now? You guessed it, furloughed again. Your only defense in this industry is knowledge. If you are concerned about job security, Capt upgrades and whether or not you will make it to retirement, you should be interested.

Also, when you hear rumors about hiring and growth you can give it a common sense test against management interviews and recent business performance. I don't like swinging in the wind with every crazy rumor.

Regards,

FBJ
 
Re: Ty

lowecur All I'm trying to do is show the trend for a possible return to strength of some of the legacy's. Jan is a notoriously slow month for carriers in general said:
FL carried 10% more people than last January. In order to know whether we gained or lost "marketshare", you'd have to know the increase in the number of January travelers.

"Marketshare" doesn't mean squat by itself- it's all relative. You can give the seats away until you're broke, but in the end, you have to make money.

DAL has been bleeding itself into bankruptcy by insisting on fighting for every last crumb, regardless of the fact that it is losing $3-5 million dollars each and every day.

BTW, people laughed when I said two years ago (on this board)that if they continued this policy, the shareholders would call for Leo's head . . . . . and they did.

Marketshare is like the old joke about "losing money on every seat, but making it up in quantity".
 
FLYBOEINGJETS

BELF is not published by WN, but it's not hard to figure. For the 4th Q their CASM was 7.69 and RASM was 12.57. Divide the CASM by the RASM and you get a BELF of 61%. Obviously, WN had very good pricing power in the 4th Q, and they were able to get over the hump. The problem with the 1st Q will be the combination of weak pricing power due to increased competition, some add'l capacity, and traditional small LF's.

ATA had a great CASM of 7.16, but an terrible RASM of 6.98. The switch to lots of Transcons with the ramped up competition from the legacy's and LCC's hurt ATA's pricing power. Therefore, the lousy 4th Q numbers.
 
I think JAN is a rough month for most because most people go back to school or real in their spending for awhile after over spending during the Hoilidays. The cold weather bites them at the end of Jan, and they ususally set up Spring Break plans, and that rolls right into a busy Summer season. If every month were like Jan, then a lot of us would be in major trouble. Hopefully fares will rise a tad and the Spring and Summer seasons will help everyone. I think it will only get brighter....

Bye Bye--General Lee;) :rolleyes:
 
I read about some dumas that got furloughed from USAir, was hired by SWA and then went back to USAir when recalled.

I am sure we will be talking about the same person. This individual actually was a Morris pilot that came over with the buy out. He had upgraded to Captain and had been flying as one for a little while when he got the call back.

I am a little careful of judging ones decision in chosing which airline one should go with when they have a choice. To some I was a freakin idiot to leave the major I was working for to go to SWA. After 9/11 to those same people I became a genius. This is a fragile business and this "dumas" could have been viewed as a "genius" as well.

My personal decision to leave and go to SWA turned out to be the best for me. It doesn't mean that it is for everyone.

Best of luck to all.

SWAdude:cool:
 
Re: Ty

Ty Webb said:
"Marketshare" doesn't mean squat by itself- it's all relative. You can give the seats away until you're broke, but in the end, you have to make money.

DAL has been bleeding itself into bankruptcy by insisting on fighting for every last crumb, regardless of the fact that it is losing $3-5 million dollars each and every day.
Ty, it's very easy to say that with DL as they are really not in a position to compete and make money from operations. Their sole purpose is to stay in the game until they can hopefully get some relief from the payroll/work rule side. If they do get that, this will allow them to carry out a more complete strategic course that will include some big changes in their operation.

AMR, CAL, and to some extent UAL are already in position to carry the fight to the LCC's. If UAL gets the loan guaranty (which I expect), look for them to continue making money from operations.
 
SWAdude said:
This individual actually was a Morris pilot that came over with the buy out. He had upgraded to Captain and had been flying as one for a little while when he got the call back.

To some I was a freakin idiot to leave the major I was working for to go to SWA. After 9/11 to those same people I became a genius. This is a fragile business and this "dumas" could have been viewed as a "genius" as well.


SWAdude:cool:

I wasn't trying to kick a guy that was down, but wanted to illustrate how important knowledge is in making our career choices. I wish him the best.

I pray that none of us, especially me ;) , end up as next in a long line of airline "DUMAS's" 5-10 years down the road.

Happy Landings,

FBJ
 
Last edited:
Re: Re: Ty

Ty Webb said:
DAL has been bleeding itself into bankruptcy by insisting on fighting for every last crumb, regardless of the fact that it is losing $3-5 million dollars each and every day.


$3-5M each and every day? Where do you get your numbers?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top