Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

NYC workers strike

  • Thread starter Thread starter Green
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 19

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
StaySeated said:
Gents, why do people repeatedly go down this road. Was it a difficult and curageous decision to take this action, of course. However, any comparison between this and an aviation labor group just doesn't make sense. The Transit Workers Union no longer has a contract, it expired last week. Our contracts do not expire, they become amendable. There was no court order to prevent this and the TWU is not breaking any laws. Most importantly, the TWU has leverage. They work for a government entity that had a huge surplus last year. Notice I referred to it as a surplus and not a profit. As a line item on the state budget the MTA has an annual surplus or deficit. They are not a "for profit", free market entity. This strike will not cause the MTA to liquidate or go out of business.

Now, forget about the nuances of the RLA or this labor group. If we strike today as airline pilots, we will most likely eliminate the existance of our airline. This is a generalization, but the point remains the same. If your point is to strike for better pay and work rules, you will not meet your objective in todays economic climate. If your point is to bring the company down, you will succeed with flying colors. Instead of talking about the "big balls" of our teamster friends, go read a book or two about the history of airline labor and the success rate of self help. This is not ancient history. We are only talking about a few decades here. Or better yet, volunteer for your negotiating committee and learn about all of this first hand. It is my opinion that you get once b1tch and one b1tch only. If your one and only complaint did not result in the effect you desired, then you take charge and make it happen. Don't like your contract, change it. Don't like alpa, run for office or start a recall of your current officers and then run. If you get off your ass you can actually get something done, until then, quit b1tching.


While I agree with some of your points, a lot of your commentary is "tainted".

First off, you can hardly compare public service employees to private, airline labour.

Second, they are violating a law: That Taylor law, as someone mentioned previously.

Third, the general consensus among the front line employees is: "We'd rather be working".

This strike was forced upon them by some ghetto-thug union goons, who could never, ever have any kind of gainful employment in the private sector.

I am pretty sure that these ghetto-all-stars (union leaders) are not going to cover the penalties imposed against the INDIVIDUAL workers, ie. the 2days pay/every day on strike penalty.
I wonder how they will cover the 1M/day penalty assessed today in court.

Also, these idiots have ruined, actually ef'd up christmas for a lot of people-on both sides of the fence.

A lot of New Yorkers will be able to swallow the extra cost and burden of commuting, but your average unskilled labour worker will be hard pressed to cough up 8-10 times the amount it normally takes to commute.

But like other controversies we (New Yorkers) had to overcome in the past, we will deal with this one, too.

Taking a guess, I'd say it's back to the farm, for these TWU union leaders.
 
The reason they have such gigantic cajones is because none of them grew up wanting to drive a bus around queens. When we can finally get it thru the thick heads of some of those in our ranks that getting to fly isn't in and of itself a form of compensation, we might be taking a step closer to the ball size of the TWU. Until then, many hapless pukes "will fly for food" and keep the slide into the shi*ter going at Mach 4.
 
It has nothing to do with cajones and everything to do with being a public service monopoly.

Unlike airlines, the mass transit system in NYC won't go out of business if the workers go on strike. There is no competing subway system that will steal customers away. If DL pilots go on strike, the airline will liquidate and other airlines will pick up DL's former customers. The two aren't comparable.

Remember, mass transit is a money losing enterprise (no mass transit system in the US makes money) and is subsidized by local, state and federal gov't. Don't complain when you have to start paying more taxes to support these transit workers.
 
Zipperhead said:
Vingus,

I don't pay any money into ALPA. As you can see from my Avtar, I was TWA. ALPA SCREWED the TWA pilots and now I fly corporate. I don't plan on ever joining ALPA again if the opportunity presents itself.


Can I get an AMEN!
 
Maybe Bush can spy on them too......

Maybe he can find out the union secret and end the strike. I mean, since he doesn't give a $hit about the law to begin with, so who cares right?
 
Gulfstream 200 said:
"think about what would happen" huh??

think about what would happen --- if CRJ pilots had the same brains as a bus driver and never went to work for 17K/yr in the first place.

imagine that pal.


Quite possibly the most intelligent thing I've ever seen on FlightInfo. Not that the bar was set particularly high.........
 
Last edited by a moderator:
MedFlyer said:
Remember, mass transit is a money losing enterprise (no mass transit system in the US makes money) and is subsidized by local, state and federal gov't. Don't complain when you have to start paying more taxes to support these transit workers.

Hmm funny. When I lived in NYC, I remeber the MTA was chided for raising the fares from $1.50 to $2 when they had more that an $80 million dollar surplus. And most of the bus lines in NY are private compaines
 
MedFlyer said:
Unlike airlines, the mass transit system in NYC won't go out of business if the workers go on strike. There is no competing subway system that will steal customers away. If DL pilots go on strike, the airline will liquidate and other airlines will pick up DL's former customers. The two aren't comparable.
The point (I believe) of this thread is that finally a labor group is willing to take a stand at the risk of losing their jobs. Whether the employer is a for-profit company, or government funded entity, who cares? You risk your job when you strike! I applaud them for taking a stand on something they feel strongly about. With the erosion of the power of organized labor, I am happy to see this group flex their muscles a bit.
 
Couple of points, I obviously didn't know what the fack I was talking about with respect to the law because they do appear to be breaking at least one. I agree that you can't compare public and private sectors, and that was my original point. Regardless, strike illegal-pilots/mta not comparable-twa got seriously hosed by a few dozen pricks in herndon-merry holidays.

That just about covers it.
 
For ALPA to be a force to reckon with they must have a national seniority list of some sort. Personally, I'm not sure the best way to formalize it but can you imagine the strength of ALPA if all ALPA carriers worked as one.
 
MedFlyer said:
It has nothing to do with cajones and everything to do with being a public service monopoly.

Unlike airlines, the mass transit system in NYC won't go out of business if the workers go on strike. There is no competing subway system that will steal customers away. If DL pilots go on strike, the airline will liquidate and other airlines will pick up DL's former customers. The two aren't comparable.

Remember, mass transit is a money losing enterprise (no mass transit system in the US makes money) and is subsidized by local, state and federal gov't. Don't complain when you have to start paying more taxes to support these transit workers.

Well said.
 
Ben Dover said:
The point (I believe) of this thread is that finally a labor group is willing to take a stand at the risk of losing their jobs. Whether the employer is a for-profit company, or government funded entity, who cares? You risk your job when you strike! I applaud them for taking a stand on something they feel strongly about. With the erosion of the power of organized labor, I am happy to see this group flex their muscles a bit.

Nice thought, and I wish it were true, but they will all be hired back, as there are no people lining up to do their job for 17K a year. Or have to re-apply for their job, due to another company taking over. They know that they will be going back to work when someone gives in, or some aggrement is made. Your ideal would hold fast if ALL pilots walked out. For this to happen, there would need to be ONE labor group, that all employed pilots belonged to.
 
I Am Warning All Of You To Cease And Desist From Making Any Attacks About Alpa Vis A Vis This Nyc Strike

How any of you have escaped a lecture from the resident ALPA defender Rez is incredulous. Standyby to be told how effective your dues are being spent, how all the problems are a direct result of the membership.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom