Superpilot92
LONGCALL KING
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2004
- Posts
- 3,719
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where did "pride in contract" enter this discussion?(BTW, over 80 premium pay is based on "credit" time which can include a lot of things besides block time and is not dependent on some "green slip" trip coming available or not)Average lines are 85 hours, is that something to be proud of?
We can also consider DAL green slips and inverse asignments, where does it end?
Regardless, I'm not the one who wanted to interject pay rates of second officers into the discussion. Anyway you cut it DAL pilots would fair much better if the integration were based on pay rates than if it were based on what positions were brought to the merger. What positions are brought to the merger is probably a good compromise. Start with wide bodied captains and end with second officers.
And thus, yet again, the famed DAL arrogance is displayed.
The truth is that the NWA guys have NOTHING to lose other than an abortion of a SLI, crippled career advancement, some cheap trinkets and a career full of obnoxious us vs them mentality.
Pardon me if I don't get all weepy at losing the chance to get displaced to NYC or ATL.
Your management is more than welcome to walk way. You let yourselves in, you can let yourselves out. We have other guests, but it looks like your "ride" (IE moneymen) might be getting ansy. You might be stuck here.
But assuming this deal is forced upon us, the SLI will be arbitrated, and a new contract negotiated in section 6.
After talking with our guys, an arbitration, which was off the table, is looking like a far better option than the ridiculous "generous offer" from your side.
Taking a chance with an arbitration? Sure...but considering the DAL table postion, and the relative strengths/size/fleets/staffing/stock swap of the two airlines, it's a good bet we can do better.
Unless, of course, you guys don't like the arbitration results...but the good thing is that you'll already have a roadmap of how to "fix" that.
Nu
Where did "pride in contract" enter this discussion?(BTW, over 80 premium pay is based on "credit" time which can include a lot of things besides block time and is not dependent on some "green slip" trip coming available or not)
You're as bad as Generally about staying on topic. Luckily none of this has any relation to merger reality. ALPA merger policy doesn't factor in the things we have been tossing around. It DOES however factor in attrition and an arbitrator would have to consider that as a primary consideration. Why do you think you DAL guys are so afraid of arbitration?
It DOES however factor in attrition and an arbitrator would have to consider that as a primary consideration. Why do you think you DAL guys are so afraid of arbitration?
You're mistaken if you think the DAL pilots are afraid of arbitration. Arbitration if you haven't noticed is not on the table. If you're strategy is arbitration there is no transaction agreement, no contract improvements to bring you up to DAL standards and beyond and no merger. At least no merger this time.