Lear70
JAFFO
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2003
- Posts
- 7,487
Not quite.bige2000 said:The APU LCV was probably in the right position, however due to switch position logic, it will not open when the 10th stage switches are pushed in. The 10ths fail closed so they will indicate closed with the switches pushed in, but the LCV will not open. I dont know if the engines were damaged, so it might not have even mattered.
Yes, they fail closed. However, by the time the crew was trying to restart using the Starter-Assist procedure, the APU was started and AC power was established, plus the APU was giving a source of bleed air. In this case, the electrically-activated-pneumatically-actuated APU LCV would indeed have opened.
They tried to relight BOTH engines, #2 first, then #1 during the event but they were "core locked". http://www.alpa.org/DesktopModules/ALPA_Documents/ALPA_DocumentsView.aspx?itemid=1616&ModuleId=1316&Tabid=256
Neither engine was going to restart. Good S.A. would have at least given them a fighting chance at dead-sticking it into SGF... *sigh*
And you're right... I don't think the company is impressing the NTSB board which is probably comprised mostly of individuals with 180+ IQ levels and at least a modicum of common sense.