Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

No NewCo

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

captpetefam

Takin' one for the Team
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Posts
159
NWA makes case to void contracts

A federal bankruptcy judge implored Northwest Airlines and its unions to reach agreements at the negotiating table.
Liz Fedor, Star Tribune Last update: January 18, 2006 – 1:03 AM




http://www.startribune.com/1778/story/126449.html

NEW YORK - Northwest Airlines used an onslaught of numbers in bankruptcy court Tuesday to buttress its case for replacing the labor contracts with its pilots and flight attendants with new agreements offering lower pay for more work.




U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Allan Gropper agreed that "substantial concessions" would be needed to save the airline, but he repeatedly told lawyers for management and the unions that he wants them to reach agreements at the negotiating table rather than forcing him to nullify the contracts and impose new terms.

"It is never good when litigation takes over from negotiations," Gropper said.
About 30 uniformed Northwest pilots appeared in Gropper's courtroom to monitor the first day of the labor trial and to watch their attorneys try to poke holes in Northwest's case.

Gropper suggested to the pilots' attorney that perhaps "they should go next door" and negotiate with Northwest. Richard Seltzer, counsel for the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), assured the judge that another group of pilots was meeting with Northwest at another New York location.

Mark McClain, chairman of Northwest ALPA, said in an interview that both sides have been exchanging proposals, but the parties were not close to a deal Tuesday.

"We have separate visions for what the future of Northwest will look like," McClain said. Northwest has dropped its demand to create a separate company for work on aircraft with 77 to 100 seats. But McClain said the carrier still is pressing hard to narrow the Northwest pilots' scope of flying; the company wants a subsidiary to fly aircraft with fewer than 77 seats.
"It still involves significant outsourcing from what is allowed in our current contract," McClain said.

Seltzer told the court that management could take a safe course and reach a fair, negotiated agreement with the pilots union. Or, he said, the company could continue to "overreach" on its requests and "risk disaster." Northwest is attempting to reduce its total labor costs by $1.4 billion a year and wants the pilots to provide $612 million of that savings.

Brian Leitch, Northwest's attorney, told the judge that the pilots union and the Professional Flight Attendants Association (PFAA) both have raised the threat of strikes if they can't reach agreements and contract terms are imposed on them.

At this stage, the unions' leaders have not asked their members to take strike authorization votes.

But Leitch said that if strike plans move forward, he will ask the court for an injunction to block a strike. He also would argue that the Railway Labor Act, which governs airline labor negotiations, does not permit a strike under these circumstances.

Karen Schultz, a PFAA executive board member, said the union's negotiating team has made substantial movement to try to forge a deal with Northwest. Northwest said it needs $195 million in annual labor savings from the flight attendants, and Schultz said the union has offered cuts worth $192 million.
Those flight attendants' concessions include double-digit pay cuts and other "painful" changes, she said.

However, union leaders continue to oppose Northwest's proposal to outsource many flight attendant jobs to foreign nationals, Schultz said.

Leitch said that Northwest must reduce its workforce costs because it has been paying an average of $103,564 a year for employees' wages and benefits. That's in contrast to low-cost airlines, which paid an average of $62,510 per employee. Northwest wants to reduce its per-employee cost to $77,478 a year, he said.

In bankruptcy, Gropper said, the stakeholders need to find "a repair that holds up and works." He implored the parties to embrace solutions that will avoid a second bankruptcy -- a reference to US Airways.

The International Association of Machinists said Saturday that it would submit a Northwest contract offer to members for a vote, but reported Tuesday that it was still in talks with Northwest over increases in the use of part-time workers.
Liz Fedor • 612-673-7709

http://www.startribune.com/1778/story/188523.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I know that I'm going to get morons like YourPilotFriend rippin' on me but it seems like a pretty good deal for both sides to consider. I DON'T WANT a NewCo flying NWA stuff. I WANT NWA Pilots flying more planes. But I also want some growth down here as well.

Since there is no way a NWA pilot can fly a 75 seat airplane and make it profitable, why not let us regional pilots fly regional airplanes and have the NWA guys flying things 77 seats and above. It just seems like a reasonable middle ground. I know reason isn't always encouraged in the airlines but this agreement just seems to make the most sense so far.

Cya,

CP
 
"Since there is no way a NWA pilot can fly a 75 seat airplane and make it profitable, why not let us regional pilots fly regional airplanes and have the NWA guys flying things 77 seats and above. It just seems like a reasonable middle ground. I know reason isn't always encouraged in the airlines but this agreement just seems to make the most sense so far."


Could you please tell me what pilot group and airline flies these airplanes profitably for the mainline carrier they feed? Some numbers and stats to back up your theory would be nice. 50 and 70 seat jets make NO money for the mainline. period.

NWA has lost Millions since going to regional jets and we have the lowest paid regional pilots out there.
 
nwaredtail said:
"Since there is no way a NWA pilot can fly a 75 seat airplane and make it profitable, why not let us regional pilots fly regional airplanes and have the NWA guys flying things 77 seats and above. It just seems like a reasonable middle ground. I know reason isn't always encouraged in the airlines but this agreement just seems to make the most sense so far."


Could you please tell me what pilot group and airline flies these airplanes profitably for the mainline carrier they feed? Some numbers and stats to back up your theory would be nice. 50 and 70 seat jets make NO money for the mainline. period.

NWA has lost Millions since going to regional jets and we have the lowest paid regional pilots out there.

NWA makes money subleasing A/C to Pinnacle and Mesaba, therefore, NWA has a bigger pile of money that the mainline pilot group can use for wages. Comprendo?
 
IamGumbyDammit said:
NWA makes money subleasing A/C to Pinnacle and Mesaba, therefore, NWA has a bigger pile of money that the mainline pilot group can use for wages. Comprendo?

How much does NWA make sub leasing the A/C? How much does NWA pay for those A/C? How much does the NWA RJ operation cost NWA? How much passenger revenue does that RJ operation actually bring in to NWA after all the bills are paid?
 
FDJ2 said:
How much does NWA make sub leasing the A/C? How much does NWA pay for those A/C? How much does the NWA RJ operation cost NWA? How much passenger revenue does that RJ operation actually bring in to NWA after all the bills are paid?


If it was costing NWA money, they wouldn't be doing it.
 
nwaredtail said:
"Since there is no way a NWA pilot can fly a 75 seat airplane and make it profitable, why not let us regional pilots fly regional airplanes and have the NWA guys flying things 77 seats and above. It just seems like a reasonable middle ground. I know reason isn't always encouraged in the airlines but this agreement just seems to make the most sense so far."


Could you please tell me what pilot group and airline flies these airplanes profitably for the mainline carrier they feed? Some numbers and stats to back up your theory would be nice. 50 and 70 seat jets make NO money for the mainline. period.

NWA has lost Millions since going to regional jets and we have the lowest paid regional pilots out there.

Actually, they have made billions off regional flying. Northwest's operations side loses its money to the holding company, it's set up the way. The regional jet ploy is a leasing scam that makes a lot of money. This way they always have control over labor rates.

To the OP I don't care if you get 76 seat airplanes, but if you set foot in that thing at less pay than it should be, you should be shot. I know your facing job loss, and your only hope is these 76 seaters, but look at XJT and what has happened there. Why do you think your facing pay cuts right now, because NWA went to XJ and said, "this is what we want, make it happen". Now they are going to go to you, and tell you to fly this plane at 50 seat pay or Mesa will do it. Why am I a moron for telling you to work for higher pay?
 
To all you NWA guys that can't see the light why Northwest has XJ and PCL. You guys are correct we own nothing. But every month we make a payment for every bag cart, gpu, gate, aircraft that we lease from you. That is were the money is being made. Take a look at the big picture not just one small part of the picture. It is cheaper to sub-contract the work than to pay your own employee. Many of you don't believe it but it's true ask any accountant. When we pull into a XJ station it takes 3 people to do everthing. At a NWA station it takes at least 5-7 people to do the same job. That is how we can do it cheaper. System wide that adds up. When you guys say you will fly the regional jets at regional rates I find that hard to believe. that somebody who is making DC-9 Fo pay is going to drop to maybe if they are lucky 34 an hour. If that pay rate is in your proposal I can see it happening. If the ground agents are willing to work for 10 bucks an hour I can see it happening. If the flight attendants want to work for around 20 bucks an hour I can see it happening. Plus everybody working gets crappy regional airline benefits I can see it happening.
 
FDJ2 said:
How much does NWA make sub leasing the A/C? How much does NWA pay for those A/C? How much does the NWA RJ operation cost NWA? How much passenger revenue does that RJ operation actually bring in to NWA after all the bills are paid?

Lets put it this way, NWA has an older fleet which, if you factor in inflation, has paid foor itself years ago. Now they have been collecting pure profit on these aircraft for at least 20 years or more. The take whatever the going lease rate is and add almost double. They make roughly $100,000 to $200,000 a month pure profit on each aircraft per month on leasing. So 600 aircraft say at roughly $150,000 a month, that works put to about a billion a year in cash just in leasing profit. Remember that $150000 average is in excess of what the plane actually leases for.
 
Holy Crap!!

YourPilotFriend said:
Actually, they have made billions off regional flying. Northwest's operations side loses its money to the holding company, it's set up the way. The regional jet ploy is a leasing scam that makes a lot of money. This way they always have control over labor rates.

To the OP I don't care if you get 76 seat airplanes, but if you set foot in that thing at less pay than it should be, you should be shot. I know your facing job loss, and your only hope is these 76 seaters, but look at XJT and what has happened there. Why do you think your facing pay cuts right now, because NWA went to XJ and said, "this is what we want, make it happen". Now they are going to go to you, and tell you to fly this plane at 50 seat pay or Mesa will do it. Why am I a moron for telling you to work for higher pay?

I CAN'T BELEIVE WE ACTUALLY AGREE ON SOMETHING!! :eek: WOW.

I seriously doubt our pilot group would do that. Obviously I can't speak for the whole pilot group, ("ALPA Speaks for Me/Us") but the great majority of our pilot group is tired of this crap. I highly doubt we would step foot in a 76 seat airplane for 50 seat rates. For my part, if we did settle on that, I'm gone. Cya. I don't want to work for a pilot group that would do that and I don't think I will have to.

As for buying the whole "work for 50 seat rates or Mesa will come in": it's the same ol' line. And when I say "ol' line" I mean OLD. They have been telling us for the last six years, "If you just do this... THEN some REAL growth is going to come our way." Our last contract was a "growth contract" that even Spanjbob Janglepants said allowed us to position for growth while giving the company flexibility for uncertain times.

So, I would be happy to fly a 76 seat airplane for our current 76 seat rate and I would hope that the NWA guys can work out a reasonable 90-110 seat rate that the pilots are satisfied so my friends who are furloughed right now can get back to work. It would also be nice for them to come back to shiny new EMB-190/195 than that ol' crusty DC-9 they've been chugging in.

Cya,

CP
 
IamGumbyDammit said:
If it was costing NWA money, they wouldn't be doing it.

Not necessarily, DCI has been costing DAL money. and DAL has perhaps the largest RJ fleet in the industry. Cmr, which only provides about 5% of DAL's system lift has cost DAL over $100m in red ink last year alone.
 
FDJ2 said:
Not necessarily, DCI has been costing DAL money. and DAL has perhaps the largest RJ fleet in the industry. Cmr, which only provides about 5% of DAL's system lift has cost DAL over $100m in red ink last year alone.[/quote

We are talking about NWA here. They invented the penny-copper wire manufacturing process.
 
NWAREDTAIL So your saying the only reason your Mgmt wants someone else to fly these aircraft other than NWA pilots is for spite.

Give me a break Mgmt only cares about one thing and that is MONEY. They know regionals can do it cheaper. Thats all no, big conspiracy here.

Someone mentioned us not selling out to get them and I completely agree but the whipsawing will get worse if NWA pilots allow it to be bid outside the NWA brand ie pcl, xj, nwa.

I suspect though Mcclain will sanction others bidding on the 70 seater because if Mesa or Skywest will do it for next to nothing it means they will be able to keep that much more pay. Only problem is that the whipsaw worsens and puts more pressure on NWA mainline to lower their wages in the future. A terrible cycle and ALPA national is to Pussie to do stop it.
 
YourPilotFriend said:
Lets put it this way, NWA has an older fleet which, if you factor in inflation, has paid foor itself years ago. Now they have been collecting pure profit on these aircraft for at least 20 years or more.


The problem with this mentality is that airplanes like the DC-9 burn so much more fuel than their modern counterparts that a monthly lease payment could easily be afforded with the savings in fuel costs alone. Add in additional MX costs and denied boardings (for weight issues) and you have a real loser of an airplane. Their only saving grace is that they can be put into storage with minimal overhead costs. If flying old, worn out airplanes was economical you would see this trend across the industry.

BTW: only 21 years ago NW didn't have a single DC-9 to their name. Its hard to believe that they were all paid off as long ago as 20 years.
 
DoinTime said:
The problem with this mentality is that airplanes like the DC-9 burn so much more fuel than their modern counterparts that a monthly lease payment could easily be afforded with the savings in fuel costs alone. Add in additional MX costs and denied boardings (for weight issues) and you have a real loser of an airplane. Their only saving grace is that they can be put into storage with minimal overhead costs. If flying old, worn out airplanes was economical you would see this trend across the industry.

BTW: only 21 years ago NW didn't have a single DC-9 to their name. Its hard to believe that they were all paid off as long ago as 20 years.

NWA INC loses money, not NWA holdings. I'm not totally refering to the DC-9's but the entire fleet.
 
I always love the way pilots throw around numbers (lease rates,fuel costs and profitability), and they have no idea what they are talking about. How the hell does a pilot know whether or not regional flying has done nothing but loose money for mainline???? What a stupid statement.
 
FDJ2 said:
Not necessarily, DCI has been costing DAL money. and DAL has perhaps the largest RJ fleet in the industry. Cmr, which only provides about 5% of DAL's system lift has cost DAL over $100m in red ink last year alone.

Curious where you found this info?
 
DoinTime said:
The problem with this mentality is that airplanes like the DC-9 burn so much more fuel than their modern counterparts that a monthly lease payment could easily be afforded with the savings in fuel costs alone. Add in additional MX costs and denied boardings (for weight issues) and you have a real loser of an airplane. Their only saving grace is that they can be put into storage with minimal overhead costs. If flying old, worn out airplanes was economical you would see this trend across the industry.

Umm no.

Why do you think Champion is still flying the 727. NWA managment said you will fly the 727 until jet-a hits at least $3 gallon. Becasue the lease rate of a new aircraft would not off set the fuel savings until a predeteremind amount of $3.
 
wmudriver said:
Out of curiosity, what was the seating capacity of a DC9-10? When were those taken out of the fleet?

I think they were around 80 seats, and left within the last 2 years.
 
NWA must've opened up some damn nice RFP's to suddenly pull back from NewCo. They probably giggled each time they opened the envelope, saying "I can't believe it, they'll fly even cheaper!"....
 
fieldinsight said:
NWA must've opened up some dang nice RFP's to suddenly pull back from NewCo. They probably giggled each time they opened the envelope, saying "I can't believe it, they'll fly even cheaper!"....

The one true in this business is that someone will always go lower. That's why I find it funny when SWA guys think their airline is so great.
 
fieldinsight said:
NWA must've opened up some dang nice RFP's to suddenly pull back from NewCo. They probably giggled each time they opened the envelope, saying "I can't believe it, they'll fly even cheaper!"....

Come one people, the RFP was a sham! They already knew what they were going to do before they even announced the RFP. And I now believe that the whole NewCo proposal was nothing but a sham also. Nothing but a bargaining tactic to severely reduce expectations. The next step will be to try a compromise of only a certain number of 76-seaters to be outsourced. In my opinion, they will probably get the NWA MEC and pilots to agree to that if the rest of the concessions aren't too draconian. This has been nothing but one big sham from the beginning. No one knows how to play with labor like NWA management.
 
Yes they have there fiddle all tunned up. I can hear the music now.......its so beautiful and in the distance......la la la sell out and allow more whip sawing and we might let you keep your little pension falalalal newco we love you what a fun little fake idea falalalalal. Nwa pilot are so dumb
 
Max Powers said:
Yes they have there fiddle all tunned up. I can hear the music now.......its so beautiful and in the distance......la la la sell out and allow more whip sawing and we might let you keep your little pension falalalal newco we love you what a fun little fake idea falalalalal. Nwa pilot are so dumb

They can probably spell "tuned" and "their" though which makes them smarter than you.
 
Max Powers said:
Yes they have there fiddle all tunned up. I can hear the music now.......its so beautiful and in the distance......la la la sell out and allow more whip sawing and we might let you keep your little pension falalalal newco we love you what a fun little fake idea falalalalal. Nwa pilot are so dumb

Pinnacle Airlines is hiring First Officers! Fluency in English is preferred, but not required.
 
I don't think the NWA pilots are dumb at all. I'm glad they saw Newco for what it was. Just a way to pump it up and dump it. I was worried that they would go for the carrot. Well done guys. Keep the hard questions coming on cross examination.
 
YourPilotFriend said:
To the OP I don't care if you get 76 seat airplanes, but if you set foot in that thing at less pay than it should be, you should be shot.

You might want to relay this to the 757 FO who, while I was jumpseating to DTW, told me that we should take our pay cuts at Mesaba because "We (NWA) took our lumps at the mainline, now it's your turn."
 
Please

Butters said:
Pinnacle Airlines is hiring First Officers! Fluency in English is preferred, but not required.


Mesaba must have stopped hiring because they couldn't find anymore First Officers with gigantic egos and, "I'm better than everyone else" attitudes!

Get off your high horse and join us in the fight.
 
kmox29 said:
You might want to relay this to the 757 FO who, while I was jumpseating to DTW, told me that we should take our pay cuts at Mesaba because "We (NWA) took our lumps at the mainline, now it's your turn."

I'll bet that was a quiet flight after that brilliant comment....
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom