208starcheck
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2003
- Posts
- 232
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And the usual suspects are pi$$ing and moaning that the EBoard signed off on an LOA that provides seniority list protection for furloughed or active pilots that agree to go fly a kite in China.
And those same usual suspects would have CRUCIFIED the EBoard if they HADN'T signed off on the very same LOA for "not supporting the 495."
Basically, the usual suspects would pi$$ and moan if this EBoard found a cure for cancer and the byproduct was free gasoline....
We'll see who benefits from this LOA. Seriously doubt it will be any furloughed guys. It will be interesting to see who gets on over there...
...How did they even apply? Why haven't we all been given the same chance to apply?..
I wasn't actually commenting on the merits of the LOA.
I was commenting on the fact that the same nattering nabobs of negativity would have ripped the EBoard EITHER WAY. The fact that the usual suspects were repudiated, AGAIN, this past Monday is totally lost on them. They DEMAND "unity" and "leverage" and then do EVERYTHING they can to stir up old divisions, petty jealousy, and bitterness within the group. Kind of reminds me of the race hustlers actually.
As to the LOA itself, I think, on balance, it was a win for the pilot group, especially the furloughed pilots. I get the "philosophical objections" to negotiating ANY LOA during Section 6. But the idea that we somehow lost some "leverage" here is, I think, a reach.
Check your email.
Would be swell if NO active guys applied for China, leaving more room for furloughed guys who want to go
Any details about the China operation? When will it start up? I have a buddy who is a Netjets furloughee who could be interested...
Don't you think if a large number of active pilots left for China, that would in fact accelerate recalls?![]()