New U.S. based LCC starting soon

[FLB717]

Gentleman

PISTOLS AT DAWN,..... 10 PACES

 

[General Lee]

Jake or AFcitrus,

I am glad that you have pride in your airline. That is good-- we all should have pride in who we work for. The part I don't think is correct is Delta trying to put Airtran "out of service." I don't think you've proven that. There are government laws protecting airlines from that. No one actually tries to put another airline out of business---usually it is the airline itself that does that---through a crash or shoddy maintenence. If one airline only lowers fares out of one hub and not the others----the government is all over that. Sure, Airtran has proven to be a major thorn in Delta's a$$, but we have tried to stick to our plans and even created a LCC to try to combat the others. We know your costs are lower, and we are in the process of lowering ours. But, our airlines are not exactly alike---you are a LCC, and we have INTL flights, transcons, and large hub and spoke operations with many more RJ's. You can never really compare our two---more likely would be Airtran versus Song when it is up and running fully in another year. After our restructuring and Song's growth, we then shall see how the both of our airlines are doing.

Bye Bye---General Lee

 

[DC10]

Associated Press
Brandon Wants in on U.S. Airline Business
Wednesday July 16, 8:36 pm ET
Virgin Group's Branson Hopes to Enter Low-Cost Airline Business in United States


LONDON (AP) -- Virgin Group chief Sir Richard Branson said Wednesday he hopes to enter the low-cost airline business in the United States.
Branson, whose Virgin Atlantic Airways flies trans-Atlantic, said he hoped to take a 49 percent financial share in a new low-cost carrier with a 15- to 20-plane fleet in the first half of 2004. It would not operate under the Virgin brand, he said.



Notice the last sentence. Without the Virgin brand, the new 'American Virgin' will simply be a new LCC with 49% of the investment coming from Branson.

Branson has had a lot of success with Virgin Atlantic, but let's look at his other endeavors. Virgin Blue (Australia) is extremely successful, but remember that the concept of a low fare airline did not exist in Australia before he came along. I think that anybody could have been successful starting that airline at that time. Ansett had recently gone into liquidation, leaving Qantas with a monopoly on Australian domestic trunk routes. Virgin entered the scene and started charging 10% of Qantas' fares.

Virgin Express (flying 737-300s and -700s from a Brussels hub) has been on the verge of bankruptcy since Virgin took control almost 10 years ago. Admittedly, things have started to improve in recent months but it's hardly a fine case study of a well managed low fare airline.

Finally, if you read pprune.com as I do, you will notice that Virgin Atlantic pilots seem to be among the lowest paid and most disgruntled in the industry. I don't think I have ever read a positive post from a Virgin pilot on that board.

Not quite so rosy when you see the whole picture.

 

[AA717driver]

DC10

If you go to pprune.org on the D & G forums(Australian forums), you will find the Virgin Blue pilots as enthusiastic as the JB people here. I think Branson learned his lesson on Virgin Express--that is, never buy someone else's problems.

VB pays about what JB. I don't know why V Atlantic pays so poorly(I heard they offer a lot of perks but I don't know).

VB is a fun place to work and their formula is working in Aus.

As for too much competition in the LCC market, I think the whole market has changed and the big 5 may be heading down the same road as PA, EA , TW and BN--no one would have forseen that in the mid-70's. TC

 

[General Lee]

AA717,

The reason Virgin Blue does so well is the lack of competition in Australia. That was a smart move on Branson's part because the only giant was Qantas, and they were over charging. Virgin Express in Brussels is doing very poorly. They have a lot of competition, and they only serve 12 cities now from Brussels, which is a lot less than they had 2 years ago. Virgin Atlantic is a very low paying carrier also. The only good thing about their trips are the nice resorts they stay at. So, if branson tries to throw his LCC airline into America---he will have to contend with:
1. Southwest 2. Jetblue 3. America West 4. Airtran 5. Song 6. Spirit 7. Frontier 8. Alaska 9. ATA 10. USair 11. Delta 12. United and it's LCC 13. American 14. Continental 15. Northwest and all of the RJ's out there that do not exist in Australia. Get the point?
It AINT gonna be easy---and the bible belt people will think it is a sin to fly on a "Virgin."

Bye Bye--General Lee

 

[rjcap]

That was a smart move on Branson's part because the only giant was Qantas, and they were over charging.

What, Delta, AA, and United don't gouge their customers?

Its a frickin crime what the major airlines charge their customers for what is at best average service. Considering that more and more mainline flight listings are now being flown by RJ affiliates it is even more insulting that pax are recieving lower and lower quality of service while paying mainline ticket prices purchased from a mainline carrier.

I will be the first to admit that ASA's customer service is abysmal. In many cases it is getting worse especially in Atlanta. If this is how our customers are treated on a daily basis they will flock to the newer carriers like Branson.

 

[Heavy Set]

What, are you kidding? I'll gladly pay an additional $500 for a dried-out, tire-like piece of beef with smelly greens and a 5-year old piece of fudge cake. Plus, the ice "smells" better on UAL or AMR - it probably started in the toilet - I'd easily pay a premium for better smelling ice....

 

[RJPilott]

dam.. and i thought the regional thread was loaded with a bunch of windbags. Holy cow...

In case you havent noticed people... Branson is in bed with ACA. ACA is getting 757's by 2004.....lol

Gen Lee... awesome car... awesome show... awesome chick.. but dude.. you have entirely WAY to much time on your hands... try porn websites.. works for me...

 

[typhoonpilot]

DC10 beat me to the punch. While Sir Richard's proposed airline in the United States will be well financed and start off with a bang it is in no way a guarantee that it will be as good as Southwest has been and JetBlue appears to be. The thing that sets those two apart from the other U.S. LCCs is the way they treat their employees. The airline might be successful, but will it really be a good place to work ?

The are numerous pilots leaving Virgin after 7 plus years due to the low pay and low morale. In the class behind me at my new airline was a Virgin Atlantic 747 classic captain who was furloughed out of seniority after 9-11. In my class there was a 7 year A340-600 First Officer. I've also run into numerous one and two year pilots that either bailed or were furloughed.

One pilot left Emirates to go to work for Virgin Blue back home in Oz and apparently regrets the decision. They work their butts off there and the pay isn't great. The reason that some like it is that they were all out of work Ansett employees who are just thankful to have a job. That said, Sir Richard did buy them an island to holiday on

I'm reading a book right now on Chinese history. It describes how Chiang Kai Shek was nothing more than a well backed Shanghai criminal who enriched himself and his cronies at the expense of the Chinese people. The story we learn growing up in America is far different thanks to a well planned and executed public relations campaign. I suspect Sir Richard Branson's story isn't as rosy as we are led to believe.

Few things are ever they way they seem, still, a job is a job and lots of people are looking for one right now.


Typhoonpilot

 

[iluvetops]

typhoonpilot

he was not furloughed out of seniority, he RESIGNED from Virgin.