Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

New scholarship created for whites only

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

chperplt

Registered User
Joined
Nov 25, 2001
Posts
4,121
http://www.cnn.com/2004/EDUCATION/02/15/whites.only.ap/index.html

BRISTOL, Rhode Island (AP) -- A student group at Roger Williams University is offering a new scholarship for which only white students are eligible, a move they say is designed to protest affirmative action.

The application for the $250 award requires an essay on "why you are proud of your white heritage" and a recent picture to "confirm whiteness."

"Evidence of bleaching will disqualify applicants," says the application, issued by the university's College Republicans.

Jason Mattera, 20, who is president of the College Republicans, said the group is parodying minority scholarships.

"We think that if you want to treat someone according to character and how well they achieve academically, then skin color shouldn't really be an option," he said. "Many people think that coming from a white background you're automatically privileged, you're automatically rich and your parents pay full tuition. That's just not the case."

The stunt has angered some at the university, but the administration is staying out of the fray. The school's provost said it is a student group's initiative and is not endorsed by Roger Williams.

Mattera, who is of Puerto Rican descent, is himself a recipient of a $5,000 scholarship open only to a minority group.

"No matter what my ethnicity is, I'm making a statement that scholarships should be given out based on merit and need," Mattera told the Providence Journal.

His group took out a full-page ad in last week's issue of the university's student newspaper to tout the scholarship, which was for $50 until two donors came forward to add $100 each during the weekend, Mattera said.

It's not the first brush with controversy for the group. The school temporarily froze the Republicans' money in the fall during a fight over a series of articles published in its monthly newsletter. One article alleged that a gay-rights group indoctrinates students into homosexual sex.
 
Its great because it's so politically incorrect. I love it! But seriously, they shouldn't create another racist scholarship to protest already existing ones. They should just fight to have the ones already in place removed.
 
chperplt said:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/EDUCATION/02/15/whites.only.ap/index.html

BRISTOL, Rhode Island (AP) --
"We think that if you want to treat someone according to character and how well they achieve academically, then skin color shouldn't really be an option," he said..

But that is exactly what they are doing by limiting scholorship offers to white students only. Talk about hypocrtical. This whole thing is a joke.

At least Women in Aviation is open to men, and the Organization of Black Airline Pilots is open to whites. This is nothing but a publicty stunt and a joke. Typical of stuff you find on internet message boards.
 
OMAHA, Nebraska (AP) -- Officials disciplined students who papered their nearly all-white high school with posters advocating a white student from South Africa for the school's "Distinguished African American Student Award."

Peggy Rupprecht, spokeswoman for the Westside Community Schools district, said administrators at Westside High School discovered more than a hundred of the posters throughout the school first thing Monday -- Martin Luther King Jr. Day.

"The content of the posters, they believed, was inappropriate and insensitive to some members of our school community," Rupprecht said.

Citing privacy policies, Rupprecht said she could not specify what the penalties were or how many students were disciplined. But the mother of the boy pictured on the posters said he was suspended for two days.

The award has been given the last eight years to an outstanding black student as part of the school's Martin Luther King Jr. Day celebration, she said.

The poster pictured junior Trevor Richards, 16, smiling and making a thumbs up sign. A message at the top encouraged votes for him for next year's award.

Karen Richards said her son and his friends were not trying to hurt anyone.

"My son is not a racist," she told the Omaha World-Herald. "He has black friends, friends from Bangladesh and Egypt. Color has never been an issue in our home."

"It was a very innocent thing," she said.

Two of her son's friends were disciplined along with him, she said. A fourth student was punished for circulating a petition Tuesday criticizing the practice of recognizing only black student achievement with the award, she said.

Tylena Martin, a junior, said the poster had been on the door to her homeroom class where she is the only black student. She said she felt hurt by the posters and the backlash that ensued.

According to 2002-2003 state statistics, 56 Of Westside's 1,632 students are black

-----------------------------------------------

If the wanted the award to go to a black person, they should have called it such.

This guy was more African-American than anyone else in the school.
 
Guys, it's a $250 dollar scholarship. It's symbolic and created only to get people discussing the hypocrisy of creating a scholarship that is only attainable by certain races, when that in itself is racist.

Looks like it worked.
 
"They should just fight to have the ones already in place removed." That war is being fought every day, just like the student who took it all the way to court, trying to get into a school, because acdemically he was better suited. Not sure if he won.

We have Miss Black USA, NAACP etc. etc. Youraise a stink about that, you are labelled a racist. However, imagine the furor, if we had a Miss White USA.

Sometimes, the best way to counter this, is by doing what these students are doing, showing the hypocrisy of the system. If I knew where to send the money, I surely would!
 
I am amazed at how racially discriminating these affirmative action programs are. Due to the PC environment we have all allowed and created, most people are afraid to stand up when reverse discrimination runs rampant.

What many of these groups don't seem to realize is that while most people smile and agree with affimative action on the outside, the resentment over its obvious inequity is building silently. It will eventually boil to the point where it will have to be addressed. These types of student spoofs are proof of this, and I'm sure only the beginning.

We all agree that racism is unacceptable, but it certainly will never go away until all groups let go of it.
 
Dude should resign or forfeit his scholarship $$

Sorry, even if this is a legit argument, these guys have no credibility IMHO

"Mattera, who is of Puerto Rican descent, is himself a recipient of a $5,000 scholarship open only to a minority group."

(n.b. Mattera is the president of the College Republicans, the group sponsoring the "whites only" scholarship)
 
I think some of you are missing the point of the situation... that opportunity based on race is racism, no matter who benefits. The fact that the president apparently is the recipient of a racially based scholarship adds that much more credibility to his argument.

For the most dense out there, these people are not starting the "white dude" scholarship to directly help a particular individual get an education, they are merely pointing out how rediculous a racially based opportunity sounds once "white" replaces African American, Hispanic, woman, Native American or any other special interest group in the title.

For the even more dense it was already mentioned: "Miss Black America" = not a raised eyebrow in sight, full publicity, winner recognized for contribution to ethnic roots (ten minute spot on Oprah Winfrey show, while guests nod their collective encouragement, kleenex on hand for the inevitable tears) etc.

"Miss White America" = utter shock and horror....
 
Last edited:
However, imagine the furor, if we had a Miss White USA.

Look on the cover of any women's magazine on any newsstand. You already have one.
 
Re: Oh, No, you did-ent!

barnyard said:
Nice try Fo for life.....

Rolling Stone

People

Sports Illustrated

Time

...And then there's Oprah and Star Jones, but no one really wants to see them on a magazine cover.

Thank you so much for that. Lets not forget BET and EBONY magazine. What would happen if there was a WET or IVORY magazine? I'll tell you what, uproar. And contrary to popular belief, affirmative action isn't reverse racism, it is the epitome of blatant 100% RACISM. When someone tells me that they are pro affirmative action, they tell me a books worth of information about themselves.
 
Along that lines that Dizel8 said, what if a White Entertainment Television channel were created as opposed to BET. I bet the NAACP would have a something to say about that. It’s kind of funny that I have mentioned this to a few people and have been braded a racist for it.
 
Q200_FO said:
Look on the cover of any women's magazine on any newsstand. You already have one.



Are you kidding? You are the Chief of the PC Police, you've just been appointed.
 
WET

Hey guys, I think your rationale of the PCness of WET compared to BET is way off. Number one BET is geared towards a Black audience, not for black actors only. There is a difference. Hispanics have their own channels as well.

When it comes down to WET, sure you can make it. I don't think there would be a backlash as some would like to believe. The reason there is no such channel is that there is no market for it. Simply put, WET already exists in the form of the big three networks now, just without the name. Are they racist, no. Geared for a White audience, yes.

Same with the magazines, and the same with several scholarships.

Private scholarships are for whomever they want them to go to. Just like there are many private clubs in the US that WILL NOT admit Blacks (Ref: Palm Beach has a lot of clubs, and only 2 will admit Blacks.) But then, that's ok.
 
Redtailer

Couldn't have said it better myself.
 
You are dead wrong about WET not stirring feathers with the NAACP and other like groups. If the network call letters were WET (white ent. television) there would be a huge outcry JUST because of the name. People would cry foul because the NAME suggests it's geared for a white audience.

CBS, ABC, NBC may be geared for a primarily white audience, but it's not in their company name as it is in BET's name. Your naive if you think WET wouldn't cause huge backlash. Better yet, you live in fantasyland with Micheal Jackson if you think it wouldn't be a huge issue, especially with the liberal media.

:confused: :confused: :confused: :eek: :rolleyes:
 
If I choose to take my money and set it aside for scholarships I have the right to give that scholarship to whomever I please. There are alot of underpriviliged white students out there who really need the help. Don't sit here and tell me that's racist.

You morons who keep flashing the word "racist" need to get a dictionary and look up the word.

Blacks get enough of my money handed to them as it is.
 
Considering the demographics of the US, it makes sense that most networks are geared towards whites. IIRC the number of african americans is 12 percent.

This from the census bureau:

White persons, percent, 2000 (a) 75.1%

Black or African American persons, percent, 2000 (a) 12.3%

American Indian and Alaska Native persons, percent, 2000 (a) 0.9%

Asian persons, percent, 2000 (a) 3.6%

Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, percent, 2000 (a) 0.1%

Persons reporting some other race, percent, 2000 (a) 5.5%

Persons reporting two or more races, percent, 2000 2.4%

Persons of Hispanic or Latino origin, percent, 2000 (b) 12.5%

White persons, not of Hispanic/Latino origin, percent, 2000 69.1%
 
Last edited:
BET:
Broken English Television..... or
Butchered English Television.
 
BET is named that way because of the type of programming they provide. They came after the major networks had been on the air for years.

Lets turn the tables for a bit. If all of the original networks had been black, then I am sure you would see a WET. No one would be angry because it would be fulfilling a niche market just as BET did.

As I said before, if there is a market for WET (Note: Not one with racist undertones, but one geared to a white audience) then there will not be an uproar. I admit the media would have a field day with it, but the backlash simply would not happen. However, since the Big 3 already dominate this market you will never see a WET. As a sidenote, no channel will ever change there name to WET due to the ramifications involved. Not a backlash, but a decline in minority viewers simply because there would be a lot less viewer interest. Marketing is everything.

Unfortunately, there is a stigma in the black community towards anything with a WHITE label because of history. Most of the time, anything with such a label promotes hatred and discrimination, and that is what is objectionable. However, if you put a product, any product, out there with a WHITE label on it and it is clearly not racist or discriminatory then it won't have a problem. Too bad that this is not the case most of the time. Conversely, in history most BLACK labels have not been associated with such meanings, hence it is more easily accepted.

Swass: If you want to start your own WHITE organization that is not racist or discriminatory and admits ANYONE from ANY RACE then I would fully support you.
 
Blacks get enough of my money handed to them as it is.

How? And don't tell me welfare dumb a$$. If Blacks are only 12% of the population how are they using all the money?
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom