New Rest Rules tomorrow, 12/21/11

[Lear70]

Signed.

 

[zonejumper]

Signed.....

 

[PBRstreetgang]

That's because the pairings on the 737 are absolutely horrible. Hopefully SWA will fix them and make them far more efficient.

I must say, you are becoming quite the SWA acolyte!

The new rest/duty rules are based on science, not preferred layover considerations. As it should be.

Science that's rich, more global warming tripe, they took from "science" yhat allowed them to increase the daily flying, and took from vodoo, that which allowed them to keep the rest essentially the same.
You are the same stooge you were when you paid your 20K and became a Gulfstream seat warmer. Those that have never searched PCL's posts , do it is amusing...

 

[atpcliff]

Global Warming, a Spherically shaped Earth, and the Sun as the Center of our Solar System. All scientifically proven ideas that many people could not accept, due to their ideologies. To reject Science is to reject how things function in our universe.

God made our universe to function in certain ways, and no religious or political beliefs will change God's creation.

cliff
YYZ

 

[Tweaker]

The petition is at https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions/!/petition/direct-faa-mandate-all-cargo-airlines-comply-newly-established-flightcrew-member-duty-and-rest/1LB3x9Nd

Thanks!

Done, son!

My first name includes (Obama Sucks). Winning!

 

[Tweaker]

Global Warming, a Spherically shaped Earth, and the Sun as the Center of our Solar System. All scientifically proven ideas that many people could not accept, due to their ideologies. To reject Science is to reject how things function in our universe.

God made our universe to function in certain ways, and no religious or political beliefs will change God's creation.

cliff
YYZ

Ya, then why was it necessary to "massage" the "optics" and the "data" to depict global warming(1990's), cooling (1970's), and climate change (current lie)? Science biased by outcome is not science at all.

Why must scientists who have come to the conclusion that any increase in global temperatures are NOT do to human causes or are NOT entirely harmful or significant OSTRACISED, BANISHED, barred from publishing their hypotesis' by their "peer reviewers" and attempts are made to strip them of their credentials? How is this the scientific method?

You truck in bunk, man.

 

[waveflyer]

Bc those said scientists are very small in numbers and usually cash paychecks that read BP and Chevron.
How is a conflict of interest, science?

Amazing how conservatives have successfully gotten pilots, who fly planes, to disbelieve science bc it doesn't fit their agenda.

 

[Turtle21]

I must say, you are becoming quite the SWA acolyte!






Science that's rich, more global warming tripe, they took from "science" yhat allowed them to increase the daily flying, and took from vodoo, that which allowed them to keep the rest essentially the same.
You are the same stooge you were when you paid your 20K and became a Gulfstream seat warmer. Those that have never searched PCL's posts , do it is amusing...

He is in the running of for #1 ALPA sycophant but usually trails slightly behind Rez. Amusing maybe, but mostly in a pity sort of way.