Same recollection of what, exactly? You put your faith in gossip, inststead of the written records of something you were not a witness to?
Politics at the BOD don't make it into "written records." Can you show me somewhere on paper the written proof of the politics that went on at the 2006 BOD that ended up getting Prater elected? I know what happened because I was there, but you won't see it anywhere on paper. The meeting minutes don't include the political minutiae. Meeting minutes are only required to include what actions were actually taken by the body. You may not find anywhere on paper that Dan and his buddies were quite vocal about demanding DOH if the PID was successful, but that doesn't mean that it didn't take place. Personally, I trust my sources.
The EC considered the PID request and denied it based on constitutional grounds. The EC (including the regional members) didn't feel that the PID met the requirements set forth in the C & BLs. Pretty simple, really.And even if a rediculous demand was made (which it wasn't) so what? As is, the union decided to turn away from its own Constitution and Bylaws, rejected the applicants' petition and locked them out of negotiations while working out a deal with management to outsource half of Delta's flying. Obviously your allegation had no effect anyway.
None of them have actually offered a solution. They've offered a PID that didn't meet the standards required, and when that didn't go their way, they filed a lawsuit that doesn't "solve" anything. I see no solutions, only vendettas.What is difficult to understand is why people like you, who complain about the portfolio concept, whipsaw, outsourcing, aircraft replacement and competitive bidding attack those who offer a solution.