Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Netjets vs. Alaska vs. NWA Recall?????

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Going2Baja

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Posts
1,258
Any comments requested.... Below is some info about my situation:

1) NWA furlough since 02/02

2) W. Coast family guy

3) Currently flying Pt 91 King Air w/ 4 hard days a month

4) Have 22 years till age 60

5) Won't move from So Cal.

Thanks in advance for your replies.

Baja.
 
Netjets. Fly nice aircraft until you are 65 (if you are able). Take the LAX domicile and don't look back. I have heard there is little movement at Alaska and NWA could merge or never recover (especially if oil hits $100 per barrel). Plus, 7/7 can't be beat in my opinion.
 
Did you ask that question on the Majors board as well? Probably get a completely different answer than you get here.

BTW, my vote's NJA.
 
Sounds like you live at an Alaska base so if you are wanting and willing to work for an airline I would definitely go there. If I were being hired post ratification and had to pick one of the current NJA domiciles I would not be working here. Same thing applies though, turned down a SB at Alaska a few years back because I would not relocate or commute to work there either.
 
Baja,
You aren't clear on your post. Did AK air offer you the gig or just an interview? Do you have job at NJA or interiview??

Need more info.
 
Currently working for Pt 91 Co in a KA350. Have updated with NJA and Derinda should be letting me know shortly what's up. Alaska called yesterday asking for breakdown of PIC turbine. I think things are starting to happen but I don't want to shoot myself in the foot per-say. I want my next employeer to be the last. Thanks for all of your responces!

Baja.
 
Baja,

You probably already know what I'm going to say......but I'll go ahead and say it anyway.

Even if you put a gun to my head, I wouldn't fly for any Pt. 121 passenger carrier out there. I don't care who it is......SWA included. Absolutely no stability in the market. What happens when the price of oil jumps up to $100 a barrel? Hello employees, this is management.....we need some more paycuts so that we can compete, we need to change work rules, we need to increase productivity. Do they pass the cost of doing business on to the paying passenger? Goodness no! Why do that when they can pass that cost on to the employees?

Also, QOL at the Majors (Delta, in my personal experience) has gone from "outstanding" (prior to 9-11) to "miserable" (present day). I quit Delta to go to NetJets.....does that tell you anything about how much it sucks there? I'll bet a dollar to a doughnut that the NWA that you once knew and loved (prior to your furlough) is nothing like present day NWA in terms of pay/work rules/pension/morale. Look at the NWA FAs for a morale reference point. If you went back there, I am confident that you would hate it. As for Alaska.....nice folks, with great North/South routes for a West Coast guy, but nonetheless still subject to the same market forces as any other Pt. 121 pax carrier. Not exactly stable, IMHO.

If you're looking for a career with stability, I think that I would target UPS/FedEx first, NetJets second, and everything else a distant third. I know that there are many here that would give their left testicle to fly for SWA....and maybe that would be a great fit for you if you really wanted to fly for a Pt. 121 pax carrier. If that is the case, maybe you should put SWA up there after the Cargo carriers. They are doing quite well, and have prospered when everyone else has lost their collective asses for the last 5 years. It's just not my cup of tea.

Good luck buddy......it's nice to have options, isn't it?
 
Now I don't want to stir the pot. But what happens if Buffet dies and sells off NJA to someone? I don't think that there is stability in this industry. Alaska has not filed bankrupcy and seems to be doing well. They have a good market. Schedules seem better at a 121 or I should say more flexible. Flip a coin a hope for the best.
 
I hear reserve at Alaska is now running upwards of several years. Don't know if it's true...

Baja... if I were in your shoes, I'd go for NJA and call it a career - no age 60 to worry about, LAX domicile, great equipment, excellent company with great financial backing, variety of destinations... To me, it looks like a place to park it.

Just my .02 cents. Good luck!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top