msculley6905
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2006
- Posts
- 81
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I keep hearing that the pilot group was wanting to extend the current contract a few years ago and it's management's fault for opening it up. My only question is, why is the contract subpar now, but not then?
Nearly eight years into the current CBA without COLA and you need to ask that question? Unwavering demands for concessions in spite of record profits and you need to ask that question?
The BIG mistake I see in the strategies of both sides is that BOTH management and the union are doing a fine job of alienating the owners. I do not see that as a good result for either side. I do know that the owners will land quite fine and have good, safe private jet aviation alternatives.
In 2006-2007 RTS and the NJA marketing machine had owners convinced that NJA was the only game in town and owners, as a group, had immense loyalty to RTS/NJA. Now most of that loyalty is gone and there exists serious and good competition to NJA (the market is to be viewed as private jet aviation not just fractional ownership).
Nearly eight years into the current CBA without COLA and you need to ask that question? Unwavering demands for concessions in spite of record profits and you need to ask that question?
Ps good on the father to show his daughter what standing up for what you believe in is right.
I'm obviously not a pilot, so forgive my ignorance, but COLA weren't in the last contract? And if not, why is that the company's fault?
What concessions other than helthcare are they asking? Everything we're told is that payscales (different than total compensation, i know) has not been asked to decrease. Not trolling, just truly wondering.