Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

NetJets Recalls

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
BTW..Company still saying 2014 for expected start of recalls... Lots depends on Europe. Buzz over Globals and Phenoms is supposedly good. Competition still hurting us becasue they are cheaper..:rolleyes:

From recurrent last week
 
So how is that the Delta pilots are looking at a TA that gives them a 25% increase?

The same Delta guys that are working for a company that isn't getting slammed by a severe reduction in business, unlike NetJets?
 
Just selling off the scope on the cheap. They have pay rates for the crj900 and emb 175, but they look to be willing to sell that away for still less than the contract they got in 2000. Giving away the flying you should be doing for a few bucks is what it's killing the industry, but there they go again. If we sell scope at NJA in the next negotiation, I am pretty sure I will be fired before I get furloughed for fist fights with at least one who voted the scope away.
 
Yes it is, which is why the subcontracting needs to be extremely limited.
 
I rather not negotiate for a few more years. Not until we accelerate from the recession and start to grow again.

In today's climate, it's nothing but "bad news bears" if we negotiate now. The EMT is going to go after our benefits (make us start paying some if it, probably reduce coverage and push more expenses on us), and I'm sure the 401k 50% match will get attacked. Next they will want new scope and try to screw us like how the reginals killed the jobs over at the majors. Then they will change the wording for the downgrades and about 700 of us will get downgraded. And will it pass? Sure. They will promise a large increase in pay for captains and even higher increase for the super senior guys and there will be just enough votes to get this thing through.

First off, the company can't do any of that stuff simply because the contract is amenable. Our union would have to present it for a vote by the membership. I realize confidence in our union is pretty low, but having been here for over 15 years and knowing the players involved, I can give you my personal assurance that they would NEVER put out something like that for the membership to vote on UNLESS they were absolutely positive it would go down with a 98%+ "no" vote. That would send a great message to the company that they're barking up the wrong tree.

As for buying off the senior votes with big raises, really?! As one of those senior guys, I know better than to vote for a big raise while taking it in the shorts on scope, 401K, medical, vacation, etc.... Yeah, there might be a few who would accept that deal, but again, knowing quite a few senior folks I can tell you it wouldn't be many. Not nearly enough for something like that to pass.

But honestly, I don't see the company offering big raises to anybody, so I'm not too worried about them buying many folks off.

Is the company going to want concessions on pretty much everything? Of course!! But the question is, is it really something to worry about? I don't believe so. Who cares what they ask for? We'll probably be asking for the exact opposite of what they're asking for. This is called a traditional labor-management relationship. I wish we didn't have it, but we do. When was the last time you heard of ANY unionized company going into negotiations where the company walked into the room and said they'd be happy to work with the union on a good new contract? They ALWAYS walk in asking for breaks, even when things are good. And when was the last time a union walked into negotiations and initially said they'd be happy to work with the company on a crappy new contract?

They'll fight. We'll fight. Whoever has better determination will come out on top. It's nothing to lose any sleep over though. Everything the company will do is EXPECTED. The real question is, will we be able to effectively counter it?
 
First off, the company can't do any of that stuff simply because the contract is amenable. Our union would have to present it for a vote by the membership. I realize confidence in our union is pretty low, but having been here for over 15 years and knowing the players involved, I can give you my personal assurance that they would NEVER put out something like that for the membership to vote on UNLESS they were absolutely positive it would go down with a 98%+ "no" vote. That would send a great message to the company that they're barking up the wrong tree.

As for buying off the senior votes with big raises, really?! As one of those senior guys, I know better than to vote for a big raise while taking it in the shorts on scope, 401K, medical, vacation, etc.... Yeah, there might be a few who would accept that deal, but again, knowing quite a few senior folks I can tell you it wouldn't be many. Not nearly enough for something like that to pass.

But honestly, I don't see the company offering big raises to anybody, so I'm not too worried about them buying many folks off.

Is the company going to want concessions on pretty much everything? Of course!! But the question is, is it really something to worry about? I don't believe so. Who cares what they ask for? We'll probably be asking for the exact opposite of what they're asking for. This is called a traditional labor-management relationship. I wish we didn't have it, but we do. When was the last time you heard of ANY unionized company going into negotiations where the company walked into the room and said they'd be happy to work with the union on a good new contract? They ALWAYS walk in asking for breaks, even when things are good. And when was the last time a union walked into negotiations and initially said they'd be happy to work with the company on a crappy new contract?

They'll fight. We'll fight. Whoever has better determination will come out on top. It's nothing to lose any sleep over though. Everything the company will do is EXPECTED. The real question is, will we be able to effectively counter it?

Pretty much the deal!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top