"I'm not one of them, but I do think any battle is better-fought if you use weapons that give you an advantage. In your case, cutting waste, finding the money internally, or convincing owners to pay more. " - Yaak
If you have read and understood the Union's position with the company, you would know that these are the EXACT "weapons" that they are using.
We identify waste, look for cost-saving measures and the owners do pay more (more than all of the other fractional ownership companies). My biggest problem with NetJets as a company is that they use the pilots (specifically, their salaries) as a reason to increase the monthly management fees to our owners. These fees have been increased each year since 1998 to provide for the increased salaries of the pilot group . . . which never reached the pilots. The owners believe, rightly so, that we are "Well paid professional pilots." This is simply not the case.
We are "Well paid" as compaired to what? Now that is the real question. Compared to Yaak? No. Compaired to a 300hr American Eagle FO? Yes. I think I am somewhere in between these two. As a professional pilot of over 20 years of flying, I think $50,000/year is an insult.
And yes, like many others here at NetJets, we can and will go elsewhere. Just waiting to see what the company will pay - hate to jump ship then find out I left a $125,000/year job for a $35,000/year one! I am sure that with 5 years at NetJets, flying 600 hours a year we could find a good position flying charter ops, or maybe a good corporate gig - hate to be that flight instructor with my eye on a job when 2,000 NetJet pilots hit his market. And if NetJets goes down, so will Flight Options, FlexJet and Citation Shares. A combined total of about 4,000 pilots hitting the market.... time will tell.