Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

NetJets International Interview

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
dsptchrNJA said:
Fair enough. Let's see... as a direct result under your new leadership would you say you are happier, contented, more satisfied, than the non-union NJI/EJM? Paid as well? QOL same or better? The only difference I see between this leadership and the last is higher hopes. If those hopes materialize than you will have the right to say "I told you so". To be fair I guess we'll have to give it another year. Two... Three? If this union leadership doesn't come through are you going to be willing to start seeing the union as part of the problem?

New Leadership: I'm Happier with their leadership. Compared to NJI QOL we don't measure up. Pay compared to NJI is not as well. You know this.

If higher hopes is the only thing you see, I would say step and look again. This pilot group has rallied behind the new MEC in large part because we see results and have been included in the process.

I will never gloat and say "I told you so". I will just be relieved that it worked and the process is over.

Since this is my first union, I will reserve judgement till I've been through a whole negotiating cycle.
 
Live4flyng said:
Hey Junior, you have no idea what you are talking about.

No, junior, I'd say bertengineer has a pretty good grip.TC
 
AA717driver said:
No, junior, I'd say bertengineer has a pretty good grip.TC
Really? So you think NJA pilots are a sorry bunch of thiefs and thugs? How can NJA pilots possibly "intimidate" the pilots at NJA into "towing the union line"? It is a condition of pilot employment at NJA.

Your hardon for NJA pilots is getting a little old TC.
 
Last edited:
Live4flying--The only "hardon" I have is for people being condescending to others. Just because someone has less time than you, their opinion still matters.

I've made it clear which things I take issue with in this discussion. I've also made it clear that I wholeheartedly support NJA getting a decent contract.TC
 
AA717driver said:
Live4flying--The only "hardon" I have is for people being condescending to others. Just because someone has less time than you, their opinion still matters.

I've made it clear which things I take issue with in this discussion. I've also made it clear that I wholeheartedly support NJA getting a decent contract.TC
And I made it perfectly clear he had no idea what he was talking about when he named NJA pilots thiefs, thugs etc. You had to chime in and agree with him. I guess you should have a hardon for your own condescending attitude. Are you sure you "wholeheartedly" support NJA pilots? It is difficult for me to deduce that from your comments.
 
Last edited:
dsptchrNJA said:
You certainly have my support for a raise. There is a proposal on the table for a 23%-40% increase in pay - I support you voting yes and get this thing over with.

Have you seen this proposal? All the details? What is the National average cost of living increased since 1998 (when our last contract was ratified)? This proposal you speak so highly of is greatly flawed in many aspects - don't even think you as a dispatcher (and future management) would agree to the terms outlined there - and you get to go home to your family every night and live in a location where the cost of living is much cheaper than where I live. Cost of a home here has increased 150% since the last contract - rents are sure to follow soon. So for me, the proposal falls very short. Go tell the Management at NetJets I (not the Union MEC) said, "TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE!"
 
Schrode said:
Have you seen this proposal? All the details? What is the National average cost of living increased since 1998 (when our last contract was ratified)? This proposal you speak so highly of is greatly flawed in many aspects - don't even think you as a dispatcher (and future management) would agree to the terms outlined there - and you get to go home to your family every night and live in a location where the cost of living is much cheaper than where I live. Cost of a home here has increased 150% since the last contract - rents are sure to follow soon. So for me, the proposal falls very short. Go tell the Management at NetJets I (not the Union MEC) said, "TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE!"


Hey Schrode, I'd be careful if you're bargaining for CPI/COLA increases. I'm not going to do your homework for you, but quickly, COLA is tied to the CPI, and if you visit the CPI website, you will see that since 1998 CPI has averaged about 1.45%. The latest increase was 2.7.

Read up a bit, and you'll be quite surprised.
 
Thanks - I will read up. Just I wish we did have an annual COLA increase written into the last contract - if we did, my pay would have been 20% higher than it is right now. I am not saying I want to tie my contract to the Cost of Living increase - just that this is "ground zero" for where my increase for the future contract should be based. My point is that the proposal NetJets offered the MEC (that some think is so great) didn't even cover the cost of living increase since the last contract. Are some so blind that they cannot see simple numbers like this? How does a new contract that provides less quality of life to me than the one offered in 1998 to those pilots have any merit what-so-ever?
 
Live4flyng said:
Hey Junior, you have no idea what you are talking about.

It seems to me bertengineer has a pretty good handle on the situation. Most everybody wants you guys to get a competitive wage, but nobody wants you to do it on the backs of other pilots. Threatening to put Part 135 Charter pilots on a scab list for doing their job is pretty scummy behavior. They'd be scabs if they crossed your picket line to fly QS tails, short of that, leave them alone. The abject jealousy some of you show when criticizing NJI is pretty contemptible. It just seems to eat you guys up that NJI, without a union, was able to negotiate a better deal than you and the Teamsters could. You should leave them alone as well to enjoy the pay and QOL they worked hard to earn rather than try to steal what you couldn't earn for yourself through some kind of legal shenanigans.
 
SeaSpray said:
It seems to me bertengineer has a pretty good handle on the situation. Most everybody wants you guys to get a competitive wage, but nobody wants you to do it on the backs of other pilots. Threatening to put Part 135 Charter pilots on a scab list for doing their job is pretty scummy behavior. They'd be scabs if they crossed your picket line to fly QS tails, short of that, leave them alone. The abject jealousy some of you show when criticizing NJI is pretty contemptible. It just seems to eat you guys up that NJI, without a union, was able to negotiate a better deal than you and the Teamsters could. You should leave them alone as well to enjoy the pay and QOL they worked hard to earn rather than try to steal what you couldn't earn for yourself through some kind of legal shenanigans.
It's obvious you aren't clear on the history of EJA/NJA and the formation of EJI/NJI either. Don't believe everything you read on this website Mr.Spray. Could you please explain what NJA pilots are trying to "steal"? I'm curious about the "shenanigans" too.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top